Open Access

A novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene identified by next-generation sequencing in chronic myeloid leukemia

  • Xiaodong Lyu1, 2,
  • Jingke Yang3,
  • Xianwei Wang2,
  • Jieying Hu2,
  • Bing Liu2,
  • Yu Zhao2,
  • Zhen Guo2,
  • Bingshan Liu1,
  • Ruihua Fan2 and
  • Yongping Song3Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cytogenetics20169:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0257-5

Received: 20 January 2016

Accepted: 9 June 2016

Published: 27 June 2016

Abstract

Background

BCR-ABL1 fusion proteins contain constitutively active tyrosine kinases that are potential candidates for targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, uncharacterized BCR-ABL1 fusion genes can be missed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)-based routine screening methods, causing adverse effect on drug selection and treatment outcome.

Case presentation

In this study, we demonstrated that the next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be employed to overcome this obstacle. Through NGS, we identified a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene with breakpoints in the BCR intron 14 and the ABL1 intron 2, respectively, in a rare case of CML. Its mRNA with an e14a3 junction was then detected using customized RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. Subsequently, the patient received targeted medicine imatinib initially at 400 mg/day, and later 300 mg/day due to intolerance reactions. With this personalized treatment, the patient’s condition was significantly improved. Interestingly, this novel fusion gene encodes a fusion protein containing a compromised SH3 domain, which is usually intact in the majority of CML cases, suggesting that dysfunctional SH3 domain may be associated with altered drug response and unique clinicopathological manifestations observed in this patient.

Conclusion

We identified a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene using NGS in a rare case of CML while routine laboratory procedures were challenged, demonstrating the power of NGS as a diagnostic tool for detecting novel genetic mutations. Moreover, our new finding regarding the novel fusion variant will provide useful insights to improve the spectrum of the genomic abnormalities recognizable by routine molecular screening.

Keywords

BCR-ABL1 Next-generation sequencing Chronic myeloid leukemia SH3 domain Tyrosine kinase Imatinib

Background

Philadelphia translocation, the recurrent genomic rearrangement between chromosome 22q11 and 9q34, is a cytogenetic hallmark of Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [1]. It usually arises between genes BCR and ABL1 in the intron regions, resulting in the formation of BCR-ABL1 fusion genes and accordingly in the expression of chimeric gene transcripts with a juxtaposition of e13-a2, e14-a2, e19-a2, or e1-a2 [1]. These well characterized mRNA molecules, existed in three principal forms (p210, p190, and p230), have been screened routinely by multiplex quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays for diagnostic purpose in CML patients. However, these screening procedures have limitations as they were designed for detecting those previously characterized BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts [214]. A false negative result may occur if a novel fusion mRNA does not contain sequences recognizable by primers within commercial or laboratory-developed screening kits, conferring a negative impact in treatment selection and therapeutic outcome.

To overcome these challenges, new technologies are in debt to be developed. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful tool for detecting genomic abnormalities that are both known and previously uncharacterized [15, 16]. Due to improved efficiency and affordability, both whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in NGS platforms have become increasingly popular as alternative methods for detecting unknown and complex pathogenic mutations in cancer and other diseases [17, 18]. Additionally, targeted NGS applications have also been developed for known mutations, further facilitating NGS as a diagnostic tool for daily practice [18].

A CML case was presented in the current study. While both cytogenetic analysis and Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) suggested a Philadelphia translocation, Fluorescence one-step multiplex qRT-PCR, a routinely used screening method, failed to identify any BCR-ABL1 transcripts. To resolve the discrepancy, we performed genomic sequencing using a WGS in a NGS platform and identified a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene variant. The related transcript was then detected using RT-PCR with customized primers followed by Sanger sequencing. Our result should provide novel insights in BCR-ABL1 diagnosis and facilitate the utilization of NGS as an alternative or daily diagnostic tool in leukemia.

Methods

Detection of BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangement

Fluorescence one-step RT-PCR was performed as described previously [19]. In brief, total RNA was extracted from bone marrow aspiration samples with RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) according to vendor’s instruction and then treated with DNase I (DNA-free; Applied Biosystems-Ambion, TX, USA) to remove any DNA contamination. The one-step RT-PCR was then performed using Leukemia Related Fusion Gene Detection Kit for BCR-ABL p210, p190, or p230 (Yuanqi Bio-Pharmaceutical, Shanghai, China). For each reaction, 3 μl total RNA was mixed with 20 μl multiplex RT-PCR Buffer and 2 μl multiplex Enzyme mix in a total volume of 25 μl. The RT-PCR was conducted at 42 °C for 30 min, 94 °C for 5 min, and followed by 40 cycles 94 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min on a 7300 Real Time PCR System (ABI, USA).

FISH analysis detecting BCR-ABL fusion

We conducted FISH analysis on patient’s bone marrow aspiration sample using BCR-ABL FISH Probe kit (GP Medical, Beijing, China) per vender’s instruction. Two DNA probes targeting the 5′ end of BCR and the 3′ end of ABL1 were labeled with green and red fluorescent dye, respectively. In a normal nucleus, the probe-targeted sequences were located on different chromosomes as indicated as separated green and red signals. However, when fusion occurs in a tumor cell, a yellowish signal should be observed due to the fusion of BCR and ABL1 genes, resulting in the colocalization of the green and red fluorescent signals.

Whole genome sequencing in a next-generation sequencing platform

Genomic DNA (gDNA) library for next-generation sequencing was prepared using TruSeq Nano DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The gDNAs were shared into fragments using Covaris and ligated at both ends with indexed paired-end adaptors (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The adapter-ligated gDNAS were purified and then used as templates in a ligation-mediated PCR for 8 cycles. The PCR amplicons were quantitated using Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) after removing primers, and then diluted into solutions at 0.75 ng/ul. The magnitude of enrichment were subsequently estimated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Paired-end DNA sequencing was performed on a HiSeq X (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Illumina bcl2fastq software version 2.15 was used for base calling analysis.

Case presentation

Patient

A 24-year-old male patient presented to the hospital with significant bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy in February 2015. Multiple large necrotic lymph nodes was increased in size from 1 × 1.5 cm to 5 × 3 cm within 10 days. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) detected additional bilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. The patient also showed symptoms including constant low fever, red and swollen gums, and splenomegaly. The patient was diagnosed as CML upon the completion of blood and bone marrow examininations. The full blood count indicated leukocytosis with elevated level of white blood cells (WBCs, 222 × 109/L), neutrophils (95.3 × 109/L), platelet (938 × 109/L), and normal level of hemoglobin (116 g/L). Periphery blood smear analysis suggested granulocytosis with the presence of circulating myeloblasts (6 %) and immature granulocytes at various stages (Table 1). Bone marrow aspiration analysis indicated hypercellularity with prominent eosinophilia, basophilia, and elevated level of myeloblasts (5.4 %) and promyelocytes (8 %) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). A decreased level of lymphocytes with normal morphology was also observed. The myeloid/erythroid (M:E) ratio was significantly increased in both periphery blood and bone marrow (Table 1).
Table 1

Analysis of periphery blood smear and bone marrow aspiration

Cell type

Blood smear

Bone marrow aspiration

Cell count (%)

Reference (Mean ± sem)

Cell count (%)

Myeloblast

6.0

0.64 ± 0.33

5.4

Promyelocyte

4.0

1.57 ± 0.60

8.0

Neutrophil

   

 N. myelocyte

11.0

6.49 ± 2.04

18.2

 N. metamyelocyte

8.5

7.90 ± 1.97

7.6

 N. band

14.5

23.72 ± 3.50

14.6

 Neutrophil

14.0

9.44 ± 2.92

13.8

Eosinophil

13.0

0.86 ± 0.61

11.0

Basophil

5.5

0.30 ± 0.05

1.8

Lymphocyte

16.0

22.78 ± 7.04

9.4

Monocyte

7.5

3.00 ± 0.88

4.2

M:E ratio

153:0

3.00 ± 1.00

215:1

Fig. 1

Image of bone marrow aspiration (400x) showing hypercellularity with elevated level of myeloblasts, eosinophils, and basophils

Detection of BACR-ABL1 fusion gene with the NGS

Bone marrow karyotype showed a phenotype of 46,XY,t (9;22) (q34;q11) [10/10] (Fig. 2). FISH analysis suggested a possible fusion between the BCR and ABL1 genes. However, fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) failed to detect any previously characterized BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts p210 (e13-a2 and e14-a2), p190 (e1-a2), and p230 (e19-a2). To clarify whether a BCR-ABL1 fusion occurred in this patient, we conducted whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis on a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. We detected a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene with novel breakpoints in the BCR intron 14 and the ABL1 intron 2, respectively (Fig. 3a). Based on this finding, we predicted that the fusion junction in the novel BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript was flanked by sequences from the BCR exon 14 (e14) and ABL1 exon 3 (a3), which were used as templates for designing customized PCR primers. Through using these primers, we conducted RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and identified the corresponding BCR-ABL1 hybrid mRNA with an e14a3 junction (Fig. 3b). Through NGS, we also detected nonsynonymous single nucleotide variant (SNV) in several well-known leukemic genes, including FLT3 (c.A20G:p.D7G), KIT (c.A1621C:p.M541L), PAX5 (c.C878T:p.T293), and TP53 (c.C215G:p.P72R). However, it is not clear whether these mutations play any important roles in leukemogenesis due to either no or limited reports associated with each of these mutations in cancer.
Fig. 2

Cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow aspiration showing a karyotype 46,xy,t (9;22) (q34;q11). A gene translocation occurred between chromosomes 9 and 22 resulting Philadelphia chromosomes at the sites as indicated with arrows

Fig. 3

A novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene and its transcript in a CML case. a Diagram showing the breaking point (or fusion junction) and flanking sequences from BCR Intron 14 and ABL1 intron 2, which were identified using WGS in a NGS platform. b BCR-ABL1 cDNA sequence around the fusion junction and related chromatogram are shown. The junction is indicated with an arrow. The origins of cDNA sequences were also indicated

Treatment

Diagnosed with CML, the patient was initially treated with hydroxyurea to improve blood count. Additional medicines, including antibiotics and anti-infection drugs, were also prescribed to relief fever, gum swelling and redness, and other complications. After detecting the novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, imatinib was used at 400 mg/day as a targeted treatment. However, despite an improved blood count, the patient showed intolerant reactions, including raised fever, sore throat, right-side maxillofacial swelling, etc., after 40 days’ treatment. The dosage of imatinib was then reduced to 300 mg/day. The full blood count was significantly improved with a WBC count at a relatively stable level (3 to 10 × 109/L). The patient was then released with continued imatinib usage at 300 mg/day and with periodic follow-up examinations.

Discussion

In this study, we reported that a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene was identified by NGS technology, but not by a routinely-used, RT-qPCR-based method in a rare case of CML. Its mRNA transcript was subsequently detected using RT-qPCR with customized primers. Our result suggested that the NGS-based application can be employed as a diagnostic tool in those difficult cases with novel or complex genomic abnormalities.

CML, a malignant myeloproliferative disorder, originates from a hematopoietic stem cell that carries a Philadelphia chromosome, characterized by a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, or t (9,22). This translocation generates a fusion gene with the juxtaposition of the BCR gene fragment at the 5′ end and the ABL1 gene fragment at the 3′end [20]. An in-frame BCR-ABL1 fusion gene is likely oncogenic, which can be transcribed into BCR-ABL1 fusion mRNA and translated into BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. As discovered by genomic and cDNA sequencing in CML patients, the breakpoint in the ABL1 gene is usually detected in a region between exon 1a and exon 2 [21]. In rare occasions, the breakpoints were detected in intron region downstream to the exon 2, resulting in a smaller fusion gene skipping exon 2 [22]. In the BCR gene, the breakpoints are most frequently detected in introns between exons 13 and 14 or exons 14 and 15 within a region recognized as the major breakpoint cluster region (M-bcr) covering exons 12–16 (e12-e16, or historically known as b1-b5) [1]. The encoding proteins were termed based on their molecular weight as p210BCR-ABL1 fusion proteins with junctions described as e13a2 or e14a2. In rare cases, the breakpoints were found in the minor bcr (m-bcr) between the two alternative exons e2′ and e2 [23] or μ-bcr between exons 19 and 20 [2426]. Their encoding proteins were described as p190BCR-ABL1 and p230BCR-ABL1.

In this study, we reported a CML patient with constant low fever, swollen gums, bilaterally cervical lymphadenopathy, and splenomegaly. Interestingly, this patient showed otherwise normal physical and mental conditions. Upon blood and bone marrow tests, this patient was diagnosed as CML. Further cytogenetic analysis confirmed the existence of Philadelphia chromosome. However, routine fluorescent RT-qPCR screening cannot detect any form of BCR-ABL1 fusion mRNAs that were previously characterized and detected in the majority of CML cases. To resolve the discrepancy, we performed WGS on an Illumina HiSeq X and identified a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Although the breakpoint in the BCR gene is located in intron between exons 13 and 14 within the M-bcr region, the breakpoint in the ABL1 is novel, located in intron 2, a region downstream to the exon 2. The resulting fusion gene is presumably transcribed into a smaller fusion mRNA with an e14a3 junction, skipping the entire exon 2 (174 nucleotides). This novel transcript was initially undetectable by routine RT-qPCR-based diagnostic screening as this type of fusion transcripts have only been reported in rare cases and have not been the subjects for detection using RT-PCR-based routine BCR-ABL1 screening [22]. This rare fusion variant was only reported in 4 leukemia cases, including one case of CML [27] and three cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [2830], Unlike our study, none of these studies performed genomic sequencing to show the existence of this fusion gene on the genomic level. After NGS application, this novel fusion mRNA (cDNA) was eventually identified using RT-PCR with a pair of customized primers targeting the BCR exon 14 (e14) and ABL1 exon 3 (a3), respectively, and followed by Sanger sequencing of PCR amplicons. Similar to our study, a recent publication has shown that an e14a3 transcript was detected by a customized PCR using primers targeting the BCR exon e13 and the ABL1 exon a3, but not by the PCR using conventional primer sets [28]. Thus, if a BCR-ABL1 negative result was obtained by conventional screening, care should be taken to avoid misdiagnosis, which may cause an adverse impact on therapeutic outcome. The correct diagnosis will allow physicians to make right decisions whether a targeted therapy (imatinib in this case) or other treatment plans should be used for better outcome achievement.

ABL1 protein is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase containing a tyrosine kinase domain. The fusion with the BCR gene creates a fusion protein with an constitutively active ABL1 tyrosine kinases, which are believe to be causative in CML [31]. The majority of BCR-ABL1 proteins contain juxtaposed SH3-SH2 domains, which are located upstream to the tyrosine kinase domain and regulate kinase activity through their interactions with other proteins [32]. It has been shown that the interaction between BCR-ABL1 SH3 and RAD51 proline-rich regions caused RAD51 phosphorylation, resulting in secondary chromosomal aberrations that contribute to disease progression and relapse in CML [33]. In contrast, small protein apoptin, a tumor-selective killer [34], is a negative regulator of BCR-ABL1 kinase via its ability to interact with BCR-ABL1 SH3 domain [35]. Moreover, it has also been suggested that sensitivity to the ABL TKIs is altered by either SH3-SH2 mutations or the interaction between ABL1 SH3-SH2 and other proteins such as RIN1 [36, 37]. SH3 domain is encoded by ABL1 exons 2 and 3. In our case, the whole exon 2 sequence including 51 nucleotides used for encoding the part of the ABL1 SH3 domain, were excluded in this novel BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Thus, this fusion gene is predicted to encode a fusion protein with a compromised SH3 domain. It is not clear whether this SH3 domain truncation is associated with some of the less common clinical presentations and drug response including intolerance to the normal dose of imatinib. Further studies are warranted to clarify these questions.

Through NGS, we also detected nonsynonymous mutations in leukemic genes TP53, FLT3, KIT, and PAX5, which were co-existed with BCR-ABL1 fusion. This result suggested that this CML is highly heterogeneous. TP53, the most frequently mutated gene in cancer, has often been detected with mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), ALL, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), predicting poor prognosis [3840]. Both FLT3 and KIT mutations have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in AML [41, 42], while mutation in the gene PAX5 are considered as signature mutations in precursor B-ALL [43, 44]. Although all these genes are frequently mutated in leukemia, the particular FLT3 and PAX5 mutations identified in this CML patient have never been reported before in any type of cancer, while the TP53 and KIT mutations were only described in prostate cancer and melanoma [45, 46]. It should be noted that these novel mutations would be less likely to be detected by routine PCR-based molecular screening due to their novelty. Meanwhile, it remains to be determine whether these mutations are recurrent and play any pathological role in CML.

Conclusions

Through NGS application, we have identified a novel BCR-ABL1 fusion (with an e14a3 junction) that is undetectable by routine qRT-PCR-based laboratory procedures in a rare case of CML. Due to the correct diagnosis, the physicians prescribed targeted therapy using imatinib to this patient, leading to a better treatment outcome. Our NGS result also suggested that this fusion gene encodes a protein containing a truncated SH3 domain, which may contribute to the unique clinical presentation and altered drug response in this patient. Moreover, novel nonsynonymous mutations in the TP53, FLT3, KIT, and PAX5 genes, are co-existed with BCR-ABL1 fusion, indicating the high heterogeneity in this disease. Therefore, this study has demonstrated the value of NGS as a powerful diagnostic tool for identifying novel and complex genetic mutations.

Abbreviations

CML, Chronic myeloid leukemia; FISH, Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization; NGS, Next-generation sequencing; TKI, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; WES, Whole exome sequencing; WGS, Whole genome sequencing

Declarations

Funding

This work was partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant 81470287.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. More details are available on request.

Authors’ contributions

XL, JY and YS designed the study and wrote the manuscript. XW, JH, BL, YZ, ZG, BL, and RF performed the experiments and data analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University
(2)
Central Laboratory, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital
(3)
Department of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital

References

  1. Melo JV. The diversity of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and their relationship to leukemia phenotype. Blood. 1996;88:2375–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sorel N, Mayeur-Rousse C, Deverriere S, Roy L, Brottier-Mancini E, Guilhot F, et al. Comprehensive characterization of a novel intronic pseudo-exon inserted within an e14/a2 BCR-ABL rearrangement in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12(4):520–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. van der Velden VHJ, Beverloo HB, Hoogeveen PG, Zwaan CM. A novel BCR-ABL fusion transcript (e18a2) in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2007;21(4):833–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Callet-Bauchu E, Salles G, Gazzo S, Dalle S, Berger F, Hayette S. Identification of a novel e8/a4 BCR/ABL fusion transcript in a case of a transformed Sézary syndrome. Haematologica. 2007;92(9):1277–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tchirkov A, Couderc JL, Périssel B, Goumy C, Regnier A, Uhrhammer N, et al. Major molecular response to imatinib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia expressing a novel form of e8a2 BCR-ABL transcript. Leukemia. 2006;20(1):167–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Demehri S, Paschka P, Schultheis B, Lange T, Koizumi T, Sugimoto T, et al. e8a2 BCR-ABL: More frequent than other atypical BCR-ABL variants? Leukemia. 2005;19(4):681–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mdel Moreno P, Cortinas MN, Bonomi R, Cardeza A, Mdel Uriarte R. A novel BCR-ABL fusion transcript (e15a2) in 2 patients with atypical chronic myeloproliferative syndrome. Blood. 2001;97(11):3668–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hughes TP. A novel BCR-ABL transcript (e8a2) with the insertion of an inverted sequence of ABL intron 1b in a patient with Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2000;109(3):635–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirota M, Hidaka E, Ueno I, Ishikawa M, Asano N, Yamauchi K, et al. Novel BCR-ABL transcript containing an intronic sequence insert in a patient with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2000;110(4):867–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Martinelli G, Terragna C, Amabile M, Montefusco V, Testoni N, Ottaviani E, et al. Alu and translisin recognition site sequences flanking translocation sites in a novel type of chimeric bcr-abl transcript suggest a possible general mechanism for bcr-abl breakpoints. Haematologica. 2000;85(1):40–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Leibundgut EO, Jotterand M, Rigamonti V, Parlier V, Muhlematter D, Tobler A, et al. A novel BCR-ABL transcript e2a2 in a chronic myelogenous leukaemia patient with a duplicated Ph-chromosome and monosomy 7. Br J Haematol. 1999;106(4):1041–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne JL, Carter GI, Davies JM, Haynes AP, Russell NH, Cross NCP. A novel BCR-ABL fusion gene (e2/1a) in a patient with Philadelphia-positive chronic myelogenous leukaemia and an aggressive clinical course. Br J Haematol. 1998;103(3):791–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frederick L, Beardell F, Viswanatha DS. Novel BCR-ABL1 fusion identified by targeted next-generation sequencing in a patient with an atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(8):1784–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Roman J, Parziale A, Gottardi E, De Micheli D, Cilloni D, Tiribelli M, et al. Novel type of BCR-ABL transcript in a chronic myelogenous leukaemia patient relapsed after bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2000;111(2):644–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakagawa H, Wardell CP, Furuta M, Taniguchi H, Fujimoto A. Cancer whole-genome sequencing: present and future. Oncogene. 2015;34(49):5943–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(11):745–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies — the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(1):31–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McCutcheon JN, Giaccone G. Next-Generation Sequencing: Targeting Targeted Therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(16):3584–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo Y, Ma J, Lyu X, Liu H, Wei B, Zhao J, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer with EML4-ALK translocation in Chinese male never-smokers is characterized with early-onset. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):834.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Apperley JF. Chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1447–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Melo JV, Gordon DE, Cross NC, Goldman JM. The ABL-BCR fusion gene is expressed in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1993;81(1):158–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Melo JV. BCR-ABL gene variants. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1997;10(2):203–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chissoe SL, Bodenteich A, Wang YF, Wang YP, Burian D, Clifton SW, et al. Sequence and analysis of the human ABL gene, the BCR gene, and regions involved in the Philadelphia chromosomal translocation. Genomics. 1995;27(1):67–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pane F, Frigeri F, Sindona M, Luciano L, Ferrara F, Cimino R, et al. Neutrophilic-chronic myeloid leukemia: a distinct disease with a specific molecular marker (BCR/ABL with C3/A2 junction). Blood. 1996;88(7):2410–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Saglio G, Guerrasio A, Rosso C, Zaccaria A, Tassinari A, Serra A, et al. New type of Bcr/Abl junction in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 1990;76(9):1819–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wada H, Mizutani S, Nishimura J, Usuki Y, Kohsaki M, Komai M, et al. Establishment and molecular characterization of a novel leukemic cell line with Philadelphia chromosome expressing p230 BCR/ABL fusion protein. Cancer Res. 1995;55(14):3192–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jinawath N, Norris-Kirby A, Smith BD, Gocke CD, Batista DA, Griffin CA, et al. A rare e14a3 (b3a3) BCR-ABL fusion transcript in chronic myeloid leukemia: diagnostic challenges in clinical laboratory practice. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(4):359–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurita D, Hatta Y, Hojo A, Kura Y, Sawada U, Kanda Y, et al. Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a rare b3a3 type BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript. Cancer Genet. 2016;209(4):161–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim J, Park TS, Lyu CJ, Song J, Lee KA, Kim SJ, et al. BCR/ABL rearrangement with b3a3 fusion transcript in a case of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009;189(2):132–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Inukai T, Sugita K, Suzuki T, Ijima K, Goi K, Tezuka T, et al. A novel 203 kD aberrant BCR-ABL product in a girl with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1993;85(4):823–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinilla-Ibarz J, Sweet K, Emole J, Fradley M. Long-term BCR-ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(12):6355–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Colicelli J. ABL tyrosine kinases: evolution of function, regulation, and specificity. Sci Signal. 2010;3(139):re6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Slupianek A, Dasgupta Y, Ren SY, Gurdek E, Donlin M, Nieborowska-Skorska M, et al. Targeting RAD51 phosphotyrosine-315 to prevent unfaithful recombination repair in BCR-ABL1 leukemia. Blood. 2011;118(4):1062–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Los M, Panigrahi S, Rashedi I, Mandal S, Stetefeld J, Essmann F, et al. Apoptin, a tumor-selective killer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793(8):1335–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jangamreddy JR, Panigrahi S, Lotfi K, Yadav M, Maddika S, Tripathi AK, et al. Mapping of apoptin-interaction with BCR-ABL1, and development of apoptin-based targeted therapy. Oncotarget. 2014;5(16):7198–211.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherbenou DW, Hantschel O, Kaupe I, Willis S, Bumm T, Turaga LP, et al. BCR-ABL SH3-SH2 domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on imatinib. Blood. 2010;116(17):3278–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Thai M, Ting PY, McLaughlin J, Cheng D, Muschen M, Witte ON, et al. ABL fusion oncogene transformation and inhibitor sensitivity are mediated by the cellular regulator RIN1. Leukemia. 2011;25(2):290–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hof J, Krentz S, van Schewick C, Korner G, Shalapour S, Rhein P, et al. Mutations and deletions of the TP53 gene predict nonresponse to treatment and poor outcome in first relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3185–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zenz T, Eichhorst B, Busch R, Denzel T, Habe S, Winkler D, et al. TP53 mutation and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4473–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stirewalt DL, Kopecky KJ, Meshinchi S, Appelbaum FR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, et al. FLT3, RAS, and TP53 mutations in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2001;97(11):3589–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Network TCGAR. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(22):2059–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kihara R, Nagata Y, Kiyoi H, Kato T, Yamamoto E, Suzuki K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of genetic alterations and their prognostic impacts in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(8):1586–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shah S, Schrader KA, Waanders E, Timms AE, Vijai J, Miething C, et al. A recurrent germline PAX5 mutation confers susceptibility to pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1226–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2007;446(7137):758–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Salgado CM, Basu D, Nikiforova M, Hamilton RL, Gehris R, Jakacki R, et al. Amplification of mutated NRAS leading to congenital melanoma in neurocutaneous melanocytosis. Melanoma Res. 2015;25(5):453–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lo Iacono M, Buttigliero C, Monica V, Bollito E, Garrou D, Cappia S, et al. Retrospective study testing next generation sequencing of selected cancer-associated genes in resected prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(12):14394–404.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016