Skip to main content

Comparative deletion mapping at 1p31.3-p32.2 implies NFIA responsible for intellectual disability coupled with macrocephaly and the presence of several other genes for syndromic intellectual disability



While chromosome 1 is the largest chromosome in the human genome, less than two dozen cases of interstitial microdeletions in the short arm have been documented. More than half of the 1p microdeletion cases were reported in the pre-microarray era and as a result, the proximal and distal boundaries containing the exact number of genes involved in the microdeletions have not been clearly defined.


We revisited a previous case of a 10-year old female patient with a 1p32.1p32.3 microdeletion displaying syndromic intellectual disability. We performed microarray analysis as well as qPCR to define the proximal and distal deletion breakpoints and revised the karyotype from 1p32.1p32.3 to 1p31.3p32.2. The deleted chromosomal region contains at least 35 genes including NFIA. Comparative deletion mapping shows that this region can be dissected into five chromosomal segments containing at least six candidate genes (DAB1, HOOK1, NFIA, DOCK7, DNAJC6, and PDE4B) most likely responsible for syndromic intellectual disability, which was corroborated by their reduced transcript levels in RT-qPCR. Importantly, one patient with an intragenic microdeletion within NFIA and an additional patient with a balanced translocation disrupting NFIA display intellectual disability coupled with macrocephaly.


We propose NFIA is responsible for intellectual disability coupled with macrocephaly, and microdeletions at 1p31.3p32.2 constitute a contiguous gene syndrome with several genes contributing to syndromic intellectual disability.


Interstitial microdeletions of the short arm of chromosome 1 are rare and to date at least 19 cases have been reported [117] (Table 1). It is thought that many genes, which are critical for early development, reside within the short arm of chromosome 1 [4]. These heterozygous deletions, in some cases, might have resulted in the eventual death of the affected individuals [3, 7, 9, 11]. Patients with 1p interstitial microdeletions display a number of clinical features including intellectual disability, craniofacial anomalies, seizures, tooth abnormalities, urinary tract anomalies, and skeletal, cardiac as well as limb defects [3, 4, 7, 12, 16, 17].

Table 1 Patients with 1p interstitial microdeletions

Revisiting CNV (copy number variation) cases reported during the pre-microarray era is uncommon, because the patients are deceased or lost to follow-up. Re-evaluation of earlier cases using microarray analysis, however, provides more accurate information on the candidate genes contained within the CNV regions. Furthermore, it also allows monitoring of any changes in the patient’s clinical features over time [18]. More than a decade ago, an apparent interstitial microdeletion at 1p32.1p32.3 was reported in a 10-year old girl with delayed psychomotor development and facial dysmorphism. This de novo structural chromosomal rearrangement was detected by karyotype analysis alone followed by fluorescent in situ hybrization (FISH) without defining the exact size and location of the microdeletion [10]. Here we revisited this proband to revise the karyotype and to define the size of this microdeletion by molecular analysis. From molecular dissection of our case with six published cases of microdeletions, a balanced translocation, and seven unpublished DECIPHER cases [23], we propose that there are at least six chromosomal segments within this region, and each segment harbors at least one candidate gene for intellectual disability. We also determined the transcript levels of six candidate genes (DAB1, HOOK1, NFIA, DOCK7, DNAJC6 and PDE4B) for syndromic intellectual disability.


Case presentation

The proband (DGDP005) is a 23-year-old female with a history of developmental delay and intellectual disability. In infancy, developmental milestones were delayed and she exhibited impaired motor skills (Table 2). The patient displayed craniofacial anomalies including macrocephaly (Fig. 1a, b, d-g), frontal bossing (Fig. 1b) and low-set ears (Fig. 1d). She was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), ocular hypertension (OHT), and developmental encephalopathy with cognitive impairment (Table 2).

Table 2 Timescale of DGDP005’s medical evaluations as well as her clinical features
Fig. 1

Phenotypic features of DGDP005. a Facial and head appearance including macrocephaly and upper body picture at 4 years (b) Lateral facial feature of 4 years of age showing frontal bossing (c) Full body picture as a 7 years old (d) upper body and head appearance presenting with macrocephaly at 12 (e) 13 (f) 16 and (g) 18 years of age

At age 10, her grades were Bs and Cs, but school challenges warranted special education. She also had difficulty falling asleep and she took nightly melatonin. She was diagnosed with ADHD, hypertonia, and possible sensory integration difficulties (further details on her phenotype up to age10 can be found in Zinner and Batanian (2003) [10]).

At 14 years of age, she took the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales-Fifth edition (SB5). She had difficulty staying on a task requiring redirection. Her general cognitive ability was estimated to be in the low average range with a full scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) score of 83 (95 % confidence interval 79–87), suggesting intellectual disability. She received a score of 79 in the nonverbal reasoning abilities, which is in the borderline range, and higher than only 8 % of her peers. In verbal reasoning abilities, she scored 88, which is in the low average, and just above ~12 % of her peers. Her ability to solve verbal and nonverbal problems using inductive or deductive reasoning was average. Her overall thinking and reasoning was worse than ~87 % of children of her age. She scored in the low average range for general information gathering, attention span, and concentration. Her ability to see patterns, relationships, and spatial orientations among diverse pieces of visual display, as well as her ability with numbers and numerical problem solving with word problems or with picture relationships were borderline.

At age 16, she was found to display OHT and ADHD, language disability in written language expression as well as in math calculation and math reasoning. She passed the vision test scoring 20/10 and 20/20 for the right and left eye respectively. Her hearing was adequate for the classroom functioning. She showed significant difficulties in fine motor functions with soft neurological signs. Overall, the assessment showed that she continued to be a student with intellectual disability and ADHD.

When she was 18, the patient was re-evaluated by the child neurology services. She was diagnosed with developmental encephalopathy with cognitive impairment, OCD and ADHD. She was treated with fluoxetine and Adderall for OCD and ADHD, respectively. Some of her facial dysmorphisms became more evident at age 18, such as her prominent forehead, narrow nose, and thin lips (Fig. 1). She still displayed low-set ears (Fig. 1d). At the age of 22, she was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with subarachnoid as well as intraventricular hemorrhage with layering in the posterior fossa. She was also diagnosed with a right anterior communicating artery aneurysm and continued to show developmental delay, OCD and ADHD.

Cell culture

Lymphocytes were isolated from the patient’s blood samples by density gradient centrifugation as we have done previously [19]. Lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) was generated from the patient’s blood in order to determine the transcript levels of genes of interests.

Genomic DNA extraction and microarray

Genomic DNA was extracted from the patient’s blood samples using a standard phenol-chloroform protocol with minor modifications. The human genome 244 K array (Agilent technologies, G4411B) was used to detect copy number variation as described previously in Miller et al. (2012) [20].

Real-Time genomic qPCR and RT-qPCR

Primers targeting regions encompassing the proximal and distal deletion breakpoints were designed for qPCR. Primer pairs were first evaluated by determining the primer efficiency using a serial dilution of genomic DNA as template.

Primers were also designed against exonic regions of genes of interests for RT-qPCR. Total RNA was isolated from cell lines established from patient DGDP005 using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the RevertAid First cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All Real-Time qPCR reactions were carried out using 2 μl of sample, 10 ml of Fast Essential DNA Green Master (Roche) and 2.5 μM primers in a total reaction volume of 20 μl.



Microarray performed on genomic DNA derived from patient DGDP005 revealed a 9.45 Mb microdeletion at 1p31.3p32.2 (chr1: 57,633,718- 67,087,056, GRCh38/hg38). The deleted chromosomal region contains at least 35 genes, including NFIA (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Comparative deletion mapping of patients with CNVs at 1p31.3p32.2. The genes located within this interval are displayed. Microdeletions are represented by solid red bars while microduplications are displayed in blue. Patients with CNVs from the DECIPHER database (Firth et al., 2009) are denoted by ‘DCP’ followed by the reference number. The sizes of the deleted regions in Rao 2014, Lu 2007 (DGAP174), Koehler 2010, Kehrer 2015, Campbell 2002 (DGAP205-1), Ji 2014 and seven DECIPHER cases relative to our patient (DGDP005) are displayed. Four CNVs (DCPP274057, DCP260253, DCP288170, Rao 2014) have only NFIA disrupted implying that it is causative gene in all four patients. Patient DCP285169 with a 419 kb duplication including the second half of NFIA presents with language delay, impaired social interactions, and delayed motor development. But he also has an additional 2.07 Mb microdeletion at 15q13. The microdeletion in patient DCP300407 does not include NFIA, yet the patient displays cognitive impairment, suggesting the likely contribution of HOOK1. Two microdeletions (Ji 2014 and Campbell 2002) extend beyond the 1p32.2 and 1p31.3 interval. Vertical lines in blue represent the proximal and distal boundaries of the microdeletion in DGDP005. Two orange lines are refined candidate gene region overlapping eight microdeletions including DCP300407. Two vertical black lines depict narrowed candidate region among 5 small CNVs [4 DCP cases and patient of Rao et al. (2014)]. Asterisk denotes candidate genes in this region

Comparative deletion mapping

We compared all clinical features displayed by DGDP005 with five previously reported microdeletion cases namely, Campbell et al. (2002) [9], Koehler et al. (2010) [12], Ji et al. (2014) [14], Lu et al. (2007) [17], Rao et al. (2014) [21], Kehrer et al. (2015) [22] at 1p31.1p32.2 overlapping our microdeletion at 1p31.3p32.2, as well as one translocation case involving the NFIA gene in Lu et al. (2007) [17] (Table 3). We also compared the microdeletion in DGDP005 to seven cases from the DECIPHER database [24] (Fig. 2, Table 1). The refined candidate gene region represented by DCP300407 and proximal breakpoint of DCP276512 was depicted in two orange lines (Fig. 2), while two vertical black lines depict narrowed candidate region among 5 small CNVs including 4 DCP cases and a microdeletion of Rao et al. (2014) [21]. We examined the functions of all genes involved in the microdeletion by reviewing the literature to highlight candidate genes that could contribute to phenotypes observed in DGDP005 (Table 4). Patient DGAP174 of Lu et al. (2007) was not included in determining genotype-phenotype relationships (Table 3), because of an accompanying chromosomal translocation t(1;3) (p31.1; q25.1) [17].

Table 3 Clinical features of DGDP005 along with five additional microdeletion cases and a balanced translocation t(1;20)(p31.3;q13.31)dn disrupting the NFIA gene
Table 4 Functions of candidate genes possibly contributing to clinical phenotypes observed in patient DGDP005

Real-Time qPCR

We performed qPCR to refine the flanking coordinates of the deletion breakpoints. qPCR assays using primers designed from the DAB1 gene revealed that the distal deletion breakpoint is located between DAB1 exon 1 and its 5′-UTR. The SLC35D1 gene was found to be completely deleted as predicted by microarray (Figs. 2 and 3). The proximal deletion breakpoint was found to reside in the intergenic region between gene SLC35D1 and uncharacterized gene C1orf141 (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 3

Refining the deletion breakpoints in DGDP005 by qPCR. The 5′-UTR of the DAB1 gene is deleted while its first exon is intact indicating that the distal deletion breakpoint lies between DAB1 exon 1 and the 5′-UTR. The NFIA gene and SLC35D1 are both completely deleted in our patient. Two separate loci located in the proximal and distal intergenic region between SLC35D1 and C1orf141 were also assayed by qPCR. The distal intergenic region residing closer to SLC35D1 was found to be contained in the microdeletion, while the proximal intergenic region was intact. A value close to 1 indicates that the locus is not deleted, while a value near 0.5 shows deletion on another allele


Expression analysis of six genes of interest by RT-qPCR revealed that the transcript levels of NFIA, DAB1 and DNAJC6 were markedly reduced in the patient relative to a healthy white female control (Fig. 4). Transcripts derived from HOOK1 and DOCK7 were reduced approximately by half, while PDE4B transcripts decreased moderately (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Transcript levels of six candidate genes involved in CNVs were determined by RT-qPCR. The level of transcripts of DAB1, NFIA and DNAJC6 were markedly reduced in DGDP005 relative to the healthy white female control. Transcripts derived from HOOK1 and DOCK7 were reduced approximately by half, while PDE4B transcripts decreased moderately


The female patient (DGDP005) examined in this study was first reported as a 10-year old girl possessing a rare 1p32.1p32.3 microdeletion [10]. Characterization of the microdeletion in the patient by microarray allowed the refinement of the microdeletion from 1p32.1p32.3 to 1p31.3p32.2. The health condition of DGDP005 has been monitored regularly since the first few months of her life. Psychomotor delay and craniofacial anomalies were apparent since infancy [10]. During the follow-up, she has continued to display developmental delay and as a result, special education has been implemented in her curriculum. Craniofacial anomalies such as macrocephaly and frontal bossing became more pronounced over time, suggesting the involvement of culprit gene(s) in continuous skull development since infancy [10]. Additional features such as OCD and intraventricular hemorrhage were also observed after the age of ten, emphasizing the importance of follow-up.

We have now determined the size of the deletion in DGDP005 by microarray and refined the locations of the flanking deletion breakpoints by qPCR (Figs. 2 and 3). The deleted region is at least 9.45 Mb encompassing more than 35 annotated genes including NFIA [17]. Only four smaller-sized heterozygous microdeletions (Rao 2014, Lu 2007, Koehler 2010 and Kehrer 2015) have been reported so far within this interval (Fig. 2). The patient of Koehler et al. (2010) [12] had a 1p31.3p32.2 microdeletion while another patient DGAP174 of Lu et al. (2007) had a deletion at 1p31.3p32.1 with additional translocation, 46,XY, t(1;3)(p31.1;q25.1) [17]. The patient of Rao et al. (2014) had a small microdeletion spanning exons 4–9 within NFIA [21]. The distal part of the microdeletion of Kehrer overlaps with the proximal part of DGDP005 and the more refined candidate region is represented by DCP300407. Two larger microdeletions of two half siblings (DGAP205-1 and DGAP205-1S) (Table 3) reported in Campbell et al. (2002) and a patient described in Ji et al. (2014) encompassing the whole chromosomal region deleted in DGDP005, have also previously been published [9, 14] (Fig. 2).

Haploinsufficiency of the NFIA gene is expected to cause an abnormal corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly or hydrocephalus, developmental delay, tethered spinal cord, Chiari I malformation, seizures, urinary tract defects, and craniofacial anomalies [17, 21]. Furthermore, disruption of nfia in mouse results in severe developmental defects including agenesis of corpus callosum, severe communicating hydrocephalus, female subfertility, and male sterility [24]. Five CNV cases (DCDP274057, DCP260253, DCP285169, DCP288170, Rao 2014) only had NFIA disrupted (Fig. 2). Among these five DECIPHER cases, DCP288170 with an intragenic deletion within NFIA, displayed intellectual disability. Although, this phenotype was not emphasized in Lu et al. (2007) [17], DGAP104 with a balanced translocation of t(1;20)(p31.3;q13.31) disrupting NFIA at 1p31.3 breakpoint (Table 3) also displayed intellectual disability (global IQ score of 52). Patient DCP274057 presents with global developmental delay while DCP285169 displays expressive and receptive language delay. The patient reported in Rao et al. (2014) with a deletion involving exons 4–9 of NFIA was only 8 years-old, and had not yet been evaluated intellectual disability [21]. The aforementioned patients clearly suggest that disruption of NFIA is likely to cause intellectual disability, or cognitive deficits. Indeed, the NFIA transcript levels were markedly reduced in DGDP005 (Fig. 4) suggesting that NFIA may be contributing to syndromic intellectual disability.

Notably, four microdeletion patients namely Campbell et al., 2002 [9], Koehler et al., 2010 [12], Ji et al., 2014 [14] and DGDP005 had in common macrocephaly (Table 3). Importantly, a balanced translocation patient DGAP104, in whom NFIA is disrupted at 1p31.3 [17] also had macrocephaly. Furthermore, the patient reported in Rao et al. (2014) [21] with a smaller microdeletion within NFIA also had macrocephaly (Fig. 2 and Tables 1 and 3). Collectively, these findings underscore that the haploinsufficiency of NFIA is sufficient to cause intellectual disability and macrocephaly, two of the core phenotypic features of del (1)(p31.3p32.2) microdeletion syndrome.

While comparing the clinical features of our patient with the two half-siblings [9] who have a larger microdeletion including NFIA, we found that DGDP005 does not manifest ventriculomegaly, tethered spinal cord, Chiari I malformation, or urinary tract defects. Similarly, the patient having a smaller microdeletion encompassing NFIA [12] displayed only three of the clinical features as a result of NFIA deletion, namely abnormal corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly and developmental delay. Incomplete penetrance may partly explain why all phenotypes expected from NIFA disruption are not manifested in the patients with an NFIA deletion (Table 3 and Fig. 2) [25]. We have not included DGAP174 [17] in the comparison because he had a de novo translocation t(1;3) (p31.1; q25.1)dn in addition to a 2.2 Mb interstitial deletion at 1p31.3-p32.1 (Table 3).

Reviewing phenotypes displayed by patients with microdeletions at 1p31.3-1p32.2 enabled identification of at least 17 clinical features seen across all patients (Table 3). Because of the putative chromosomal segments with corresponding candidate genes for cognitive impairment within this region, it is obvious that not all phenotypes observed can be attributed to NFIA alone. It is likely that genes including NFIA in this region are haploinsufficient thereby contributing to the 17 clinical features observed across all patients (Table 3) [17]. It supports the idea that the 1p31.3p32.2 microdeletion may constitute a “chromosome syndrome” postulated in Zinner and Batanian (2003) [10], which meant to be contiguous gene deletion syndrome [26]. Recently, Ji et al. (2014) [14] also postulated the possible involvement of genes other than NFIA. We have reviewed the functions of all genes within the 1p31.3p32.2 microdeletion in DGDP005. Molecular dissection of this region suggests the presence of at least five chromosomal segments, with six candidate genes for intellectual disability. Each segment contains DAB1, HOOK1, NFIA, DOCK7, and DNAJC6 as well as PDE4B, respectively. We propose six candidate genes (DAB1, HOOK1, DOCK7, DNAJC6, PDE4B, and NFIA) for the clinical features such as intellectual disability and OCD observed in DGDP005, because each of these genes is involved directly or indirectly in neurological disorders (Table 4).

While HOOK1 interacts with CLN3, the causative gene for the autosomal recessive Batten disease characterized by visual impairment, gait anomalies, seizures, dementia and sometimes mental deterioration [2730], DNAJC6 has been shown to be implicated in Parkinson disease [31]. It is noteworthy that Batten disease is also characterized by progressive neurodegeneration and impaired motor skills [32] like Parkinson disease [33, 34]. Furthermore, patient DCP300407 with only HOOK1, CYP2J2 and C1orf87 deleted (Fig. 2) displays cognitive impairment [24]. Additionally, PDE4B is implicated in schizophrenia [35], whereas DAB1 truncated in our patient is required for synaptic function as well as associative learning in mice [36], and has been shown to be associated with autism [37].

Recently, mutation in DOCK7 has been found to be associated with epileptic encephalopathies, dysmorphic features and intellectual disability [38]. Interestingly, DGDP005 displays some of the phenotypes expected from DOCK7 mutation indicating that DOCK7 may also contribute to intellectual disability and craniofacial anomalies in our patient. As is the case for DOCK7, cognitive impairment is an overlapping clinical feature also produced by disruption in NFIA. This further supports the hypothesis that deletion at 1p31.3p32.2 constitutes a contiguous gene deletion syndrome. As expected, the transcript levels of DOCK7 and HOOK1 was reduced approximately by half. The level of transcripts of DAB1, DNAJC6 and PDE4B were also reduced in our patient relative to a healthy white female control (Fig. 4). The significant reduction of transcripts of NFIA and two additional genes (DAB1 and DNAJC6) suggests an allele-specific expression pattern (Fig. 4). This may be due to a loss of the allele actively transcribed in the microdeletion. It is unclear whether the causative effect of each candidate gene is stoichiometrically contributing to the manifestation of the phenotype or an effect of one gene is masked by the effect of other gene when more than one candidate gene is deleted in a microdeletion. If some of the candidate genes participate in overlapping molecular pathways leading to cognitive impairment, the effect of one gene may be masked by another.


Revisiting patient DGDP005 has allowed us to refine the flanking proximal and distal breakpoints, enabling us to compare the clinical phenotypes of DGDP005 to reported cases and unpublished DECIPHER cases. Comparative deletion mapping showed that there are at least six candidate genes including, NFIA, HOOK1, DOCK7, DAB1, DNAJC6, and PDE4B, that could contribute to the syndromic or non-syndromic intellectual disability. Most importantly, the genomic and clinical delineation result implies NFIA responsible for intellectual disability coupled with macrocephaly. Smaller-sized microdeletions across this interval and rare point mutations in the genes should reveal a better understanding of the pathological role of individual gene residing within this region. Additionally, expression studies including haploinsufficiency of aforementioned candidate genes in this interval will provide more insights both on the number of candidate genes and their impact on this contiguous gene syndrome.


This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Augusta University and written informed consent was obtained from the mother of DGDP005 for the publication of this report and accompanying images.



quantitative polymerase chain reaction














copy number variation


fluorescent in situ hybridization


reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction


attention deficit hyperactivity disorder


attention deficit disorder


obsessive compulsive disorder


ocular hypertension


Stanford binet intelligence scales-fifth edition


full-scale intelligence quotient






Homo sapiens chromosome 1 open reading frame 141


  1. 1.

    Bene M, Duca-Marinescu A, Ioan D, Maximilian C. De novo interstitial deletion del(1)(p21p32). J Med Genet. 1979;16:323–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Petersen MB, Warburg M. Interstitial deletion 1p in a 30 year old woman. J Med Genet. 1987;24:229–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lai MM, Robards MF, Berry AC, Fear CN, Hart C. Two cases of interstitial deletion 1p. J Med Genet. 1991;28:128–30.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yoshino M, Watanabe Y, Harada N, Abe K. De novo interstitial deletion of 1p (pter----p34.1::p32.3----qter). J Med Genet. 1991;28:539–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Biegel JA, White PS, Marshall HN, Fujimori M, Zackai EH, Scher CD, Brodeur GM, Emanuel BS. Constitutional 1p36 deletion in a child with neuroblastoma. Am J Hum Genet. 1993;52:176–82.

  6. 6.

    Barton JS, O'Loughlin J, Howell RT, L'E OR. Developmental delay and dysmorphic features associated with a previously undescribed deletion on chromosome 1. J Med Genet. 1995;32:636–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stockton DW, Ross HL, Bacino CA, Altman CA, Shaffer LG, Lupski JR. Severe clinical phenotype due to an interstitial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1: a brief review. Am J Med Genet. 1997;71:189–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martinez JE, Tuck-Muller CM, Gasparrini W, Li S, Wertelecki W. 1p microdeletion in sibs with minimal phenotypic manifestations. Am J Med Genet. 1999;82:107–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Campbell CG, Wang H, Hunter GW. Interstitial microdeletion of chromosome 1p in two siblings. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111:289–94.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zinner SH, Batanian JR. Second reported patient with del(1)(p32.1p32.3) and similar clinical features suggesting a recognizable chromosomal syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;122A:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Neumann LM, Polster T, Spantzel T, Bartsch O. Unexpected death of a 12 year old boy with monosomy 1p36. Genet Couns. 2004;15:19–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Koehler U, Holinski-Feder E, Ertl-Wagner B, Kunz J, von Moers A, von Voss H, Schell-Apacik C. A novel 1p31.3p32.2 deletion involving the NFIA gene detected by array CGH in a patient with macrocephaly and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:463–8.

  13. 13.

    Xu F, Cheng DH, Di YF, Tan K, Li LY, Lu GX, Tan YQ. Identification of a cryptic 1p36.3 microdeletion in a patient with Prader-Willi-like syndrome features. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2010;27:524–9.

  14. 14.

    Ji J, Salamon N, Quintero-Rivera F. Microdeletion of 1p32-p31 involving NFIA in a patient with hypoplastic corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, seizures and urinary tract defects. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:267–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nyboe D, Kreiborg S, Kirchhoff M, Hove HB. Familial craniosynostosis associated with a microdeletion involving the NFIA gene. Clin Dysmorphol. 2015;24:109–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Isidor B, Le Cunff M, Boceno M, Boisseau P, Thomas C, Rival JM, David A, Le Caignec C. Complex constitutional subtelomeric 1p36.3 deletion/duplication in a mentally retarded child with neonatal neuroblastoma. Eur J Med Genet. 2008;51:679–84.

  17. 17.

    Lu W, Quintero-Rivera F, Fan Y, Alkuraya FS, Donovan DJ, Xi Q, Turbe-Doan A, Li QG, Campbell CG, Shanske AL, Sherr EH, Ahmad A, Peters R, Rilliet B, Parvex P, Bassuk AG, Harris DJ, Ferguson H, Kelly C, Walsh CA, Gronostajski RM, Devriendt K, Higgins A, Ligon AH, Quade BJ, Morton CC, Gusella JF, Maas R. L. NFIA haploinsufficiency is associated with a CNS malformation syndrome and urinary tract defects. PLoS Genet. 2007;3, e80.

  18. 18.

    Jun KR, Ullmann R, Khan S, Layman LC, Kim HG. Interstitial microduplication at 2p11.2 in a patient with syndromic intellectual disability: 30-year follow-up. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nishimoto HK, Ha K, Jones JR, Dwivedi A, Cho HM, Layman LC, Kim HG. The historical Coffin-Lowry syndrome family revisited: identification of two novel mutations of RPS6KA3 in three male patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:2172–9.

  20. 20.

    Miller DT, Shen Y, Wu BL. Oligonucleotide microarrays for clinical diagnosis of copy number variation and zygosity status.Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008;58:8.12.1– 8.12.17.

  21. 21.

    Rao A, O'Donnell S, Bain N, Meldrum C, Shorter D, Goel H. An intragenic deletion of the NFIA gene in a patient with a hypoplastic corpus callosum, craniofacial abnormalities and urinary tract defects. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kehrer M, Schaferhoff K, Bonin M, Jauch A, Bevot A, Tzschach A. Interstitial 1p32.1p32.3 deletion in a patient with multiple congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167:2406–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    das Neves L, Duchala CS, Tolentino-Silva F, Haxhiu MA, Colmenares C, Macklin WB, Campbell CE, Butz KG, Gronostajski RM. Disruption of the murine nuclear factor I-A gene (Nfia) results in perinatal lethality, hydrocephalus, and agenesis of the corpus callosum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:11946–51.

  24. 24.

    Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP, Clayton S, Corpas M, Rajan D, Van Vooren S, Moreau Y, Pettett RM, Carter NP. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:524–33.

  25. 25.

    Cooper DN, Krawczak M, Polychronakos C, Tyler-Smith C, Kehrer-Sawatzki H. Where genotype is not predictive of phenotype: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of reduced penetrance in human inherited disease. Hum Genet. 2013;132:1077–130.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schmickel RD. Contiguous gene syndromes: a component of recognizable syndromes. J Pediatr. 1986;109:231–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Spalton DJ, Taylor DS, Sanders MD. Juvenile Batten's disease: an ophthalmological assessment of 26 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64:726–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Santavuori P. Neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses in childhood. Brain Dev. 1988;10:80–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Luiro K, Yliannala K, Ahtiainen L, Maunu H, Jarvela I, Kyttala A, Jalanko A. Interconnections of CLN3, Hook1 and Rab proteins link Batten disease to defects in the endocytic pathway. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:3017–27.

  30. 30.

    Mole SE, Williams RE, Goebel HH. Correlations between genotype, ultrastructural morphology and clinical phenotype in the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Neurogenetics. 2005;6:107–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Koroglu C, Baysal L, Cetinkaya M, Karasoy H, Tolun A. DNAJC6 is responsible for juvenile parkinsonism with phenotypic variability. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;19:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cotman SL, Staropoli JF. The juvenile Batten disease protein, CLN3, and its role in regulating anterograde and retrograde post-Golgi trafficking. Clin Lipidol. 2012;7:79–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Klein C, Schlossmacher MG. The genetics of Parkinson disease: Implications for neurological care. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:136–46.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Beitz JM. Parkinson's disease: a review. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2014;6:65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Millar JK, Pickard BS, Mackie S, James R, Christie S, Buchanan SR, Malloy MP, Chubb JE, Huston E, Baillie GS, Thomson PA, Hill EV, Brandon NJ, Rain JC, Camargo LM, Whiting PJ, Houslay MD, Blackwood DH, Muir WJ, Porteous DJ. DISC1 and PDE4B are interacting genetic factors in schizophrenia that regulate cAMP signaling. Science. 2005;310:1187–91.

  36. 36.

    Trotter J, Lee GH, Kazdoba TM, Crowell B, Domogauer J, Mahoney HM, Franco SJ, Muller U, Weeber EJ, D'Arcangelo G. Dab1 is required for synaptic plasticity and associative learning. J Neurosci. 2013;33:15652–68.

  37. 37.

    Li J, Liu J, Zhao L, Ma Y, Jia M, Lu T, Ruan Y, Li Q, Yue W, Zhang D, Wang L. Association study between genes in Reelin signaling pathway and autism identifies DAB1 as a susceptibility gene in a Chinese Han population. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;44:226–32.

  38. 38.

    Perrault I, Hamdan FF, Rio M, Capo-Chichi JM, Boddaert N, Decarie JC, Maranda B, Nabbout R, Sylvain M, Lortie A, Roux PP, Rossignol E, Gerard X, Barcia G, Berquin P, Munnich A, Rouleau GA, Kaplan J, Rozet JM, Michaud JL. Mutations in DOCK7 in individuals with epileptic encephalopathy and cortical blindness. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:891–7.

Download references


We would like to thank the patient who kindly consented to participate in our study. We wish to thank Lynn Chorich and Megan Sullivan. We also extend our thanks to Paul Browne. The present study makes use of data generated by the DECIPHER community. A full list of centres who contributed to the generation of the data is available from and via email from Funding for the DECIPHER project was provided by the Wellcome Trust. This study was undertaken following the guidelines established by the Institutional Review Board at AU.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung-Goo Kim.

Additional information

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JL generated data and wrote the manuscript. HGK conceived the project, analyzed and interpreted the data of comparative deletion mapping, and wrote the manuscript. Microarray was performed by YS. LL, MD, IKK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labonne, J.D.J., Shen, Y., Kong, I. et al. Comparative deletion mapping at 1p31.3-p32.2 implies NFIA responsible for intellectual disability coupled with macrocephaly and the presence of several other genes for syndromic intellectual disability. Mol Cytogenet 9, 24 (2016).

Download citation


  • 1p microdeletion
  • Intellectual disability
  • Delayed psychomotor development
  • Craniofacial anomalies
  • DAB1
  • HOOK1
  • NFIA
  • DOCK7
  • DNAJC6
  • PDE4B