Open Access

Chromosome number and ploidy level of balm (Melissa officinalis)

Molecular Cytogenetics20158:61

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0166-z

Received: 14 July 2015

Accepted: 28 July 2015

Published: 7 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is of increasing importance resulting in rising growth area. Improved knowledge on the genome structure, number of chromosomes in connection with the taxonomical structure of balm is indispensable for improved new varieties.

Results

A collection of 40 balm accessions (M. officinalis) was characterized by flow cytometry and FISH (18/25S and 5S rDNA) to determine the chromosome number and ploidy level. Three different types were found: diploid genotypes with 2n = 2× = 32 chromosomes; tetraploid 2n = 4× = 64 chromosomes and triploid 2n = 3× = 48 chromosomes. A haploid base number of × = 16 chromosomes is likely. First time described triploid accessions are sterile but cytologically and morphologically stable for many years. Triploids express better winter hardiness and regeneration after harvesting cuts as well as bigger leaves and internodes.

Conclusions

A basic chromosome number of x = 16 is reported for the first time for the species M. officinalis.

Abstract

Die wachsende Bedeutung von Zitronenmelisse (Melissa officinalis L.) führt zur Ausdehnung des hierfür erforderlichen Anbauumfanges. Ein verbesserter Kenntnisstand der Genomstruktur, der Chromosomenzahl und der hiermit in Zusammenhang stehenden taxonomischen Struktur der Melisse sind unerlässliche Voraussetzungen für verbesserte, neue Sorten.

Eine Kollektion von 40 Melisseherkünften (M. officinalis) wurde durchflusszytometrisch und durch FISH (18/25S and 5S rDNA) untersucht, um den Ploidiegrad und die Chromosomenzahl zu ermitteln. Drei unterschiedliche Typen wurden konnten bestimmt werden: diploide Genotypen mit 2n = 2× = 32 Chromosomen; tetraploide mit 2n = 4× = 64 Chromosomen und triploide mit 2n = 3× = 48 Chromosomen. Die haploide Chromosomenzahl ist mit x = 16 anzunehmen. Die erstmalig beschriebenen triploiden Herkünfte sind steril aber zytologisch und morphologisch über viele Jahre stabil. Sie zeigen eine bessere Winterhärte und einen schnelleren Wiederaufwuchs nach Ernteschnitten, wie auch größere Blätter und Internodien.

Die Basischromosomenzahl von x = 16 wird erstmalig für die Art M. officinalis beschrieben.

Background

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is an old crop and is used for phytopharmaceuticals, as an aromatic plant and in traditional folk medicine. A wide spectrum of secondary metabolites exists in lemon balm. For the medicinal use, the active ingredients essential oil with lemon fragrance and rosmarinic acid are necessary [6, 2, 3, 13].

M. officinalis belongs to the family Labiatae (syn. Lamiaceae). This crop plant is grown worldwide but its origin is not well-defined, however the Mediterranean Region or western Asia is considered as the area of origin [9]. The subspecies M. officinalis L. ssp. officinalis and ssp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcangeli are distinguishable especially by the shape of calyx and density of different types of hairs [5, 20]. The middle tooth of the three upper lip teeth of fruiting calyx is broadly triangular for ssp. officinalis whereas it is inconspicuous, truncate or emarginated for ssp. altissima. Pignatti [17] classified ssp. altissima as species M. romana.

The chromosome base number in Labiatae ranges from x = 5 to 11, but also x = 13, 15, 17 and 19 occur [10]. For higher numbers, polyploidy is assumed followed by structural rearrangements. Chromosome numbers of 32 and 64 were reported for M. officinalis ssp. officinalis and ssp. altissima, respectively [20]. Ssp. altissima has been suggested as an ancestor of the cultivated diploid ssp. officinalis despite being tetraploid [9]. Davis [5] separated the ssp. inodora (Bornm.) Bornm. based on the long patent hairs on stems and fairly distinct, triangular middle tooth of upper calyx lip and mentioned intermediates between all three subspecies. Pignatti [17] described beside M. officinalis L. (2n = 32) the species M. romana Miller as synonymous with ssp. altissima because of the absence of any offspring (2n = 64). Darlington and Wylie [4] presented the haploid chromosome number for M. officinalis with x = 8.

Lemon balm is of increasing importance, resulting in rising growth area and investigations for improved new varieties. Better winter hardiness, higher content of essential oil and higher yield of M. folium (lemon balm leaves) are of special interest in these programmes. Adaptation of technologies for acceleration of the breeding process using doubled haploid lines has been initiated. Therefore, the knowledge on the genome structure and number of chromosomes in connection with the taxonomical structure of M. officinalis is indispensable. In order to determine the ploidy level of 40 accessions and the chromosome number of the haploid M. officinalis genome, we employed flow cytometry and FISH using rDNA-specific probes. Beside di- and tetraploid accessions, first time triploid accessions (2n = 3× = 48) have been identified for M. officinalis.

Results and discussion

Genome size determination by flow cytometry of M. officinalis revealed for 23 accessions a diploid, four accessions a triploid and 13 accessions a tetraploid ploidy level (Table 1).
Table 1

Determined ploidy level of balm accessions (Melissa officinalis) from Leibniz institute for plant genetics and crop plant research at Gatersleben, Germany (IPK) and bavarian state institute for agriculture at Freising, Germany (LfL) based on flow cytometry

Accession No.

COLa

Taxonomical group of Melissa officinalis L.b

Originb

Ploidy level

BLBP 5

LfL

M. officinalis L.

southern France

diploid

BLBP 8

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Spain

diploid

BLBP 19

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Germany

diploid

BLBP 27

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Germany

diploid

BLBP 33

LfL

M. officinalis L.

botanical garden Halle, Germany

diploid

BLBP 48

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Germany

diploid

BLBP 49

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Unknown

diploid

BLBP 50

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Unknown

diploid

BLBP 78

LfL

M. officinalis L.

France

triploid

BLBP 87

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Georgia, landrace

diploid

BLBP 88

LfL

M. officinalis L.

botanical garden Liege, France

triploid

BLBP 111

LfL

M. officinalis L.

Hungary

triploid

BLBP 113

LfL

M. officinalis L.

France

triploid

MELI 1

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Unknown

diploid

MELI 2

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Unknown

diploid

MELI 4

IPK

M. officinalis L.

East Germany

diploid

MELI 5

IPK

M. officinalis L. ‘Erfurter Aufrechte’

East Germany

diploid

MELI 6

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Germany

diploid

MELI 7

IPK

M. officinalis L. ‘Citra’

Unknown

tetraploid

MELI 8

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Georgia

diploid

MELI 10

IPK

M. officinalis L.

France

diploid

MELI 11

IPK

M. officinalis L. ‘ital. Melissa, Cedronella’

Italy

diploid

MELI 12

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 13

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Georgia

diploid

MELI 14

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcang.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 15

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcang.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 16

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. officinalis

Unknown

diploid

MELI 17

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Greece

tetraploid

MELI 18

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibith. & Sm.) Arcang.

Unknown

tetraploid

MELI 19

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 20

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 21

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcang.

Albania

tetraploid

MELI 22

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Turkey

tetraploid

MELI 23

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcang.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 24

IPK

M. officinalis L. subsp. altissima (Sibth. & Sm.) Arcang.

Italy

tetraploid

MELI 25

IPK

M. officinalis L. ‘Zitronenmelisse’

Unknown

diploid

MELI 26

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Armenia

diploid

MELI 27

IPK

M. sp.

Italy

diploid

MELI 28

IPK

M. officinalis L.

Italy

tetraploid

D9597

IPK

M. sp. ‘Zitronenmelisse’

Unknown

diploid

aCOL: collection

btaxonomical classification according to information of collection holders

To confirm the ploidy predictions, chromosome numbers were determined and multicolour FISH was performed with 18/25S- and 5S rDNA-specific probes (Table 2). In M. officinalis 5S and 18/25S rDNA were localized on different chromosomes. Unlike this result in some other genera e.g. Helianthus, Brassica and Alstroemeria [18, 19, 1] localization of 5S and 18/25S rDNA on the same chromosome was found. Analysis of six selected accessions revealed for the putative diploid genotypes a chromosome number of 32 and two chromosome pairs exhibiting either 18/25S rDNA- or 5S rDNA-specific signals (Fig. 1a, b). Putative triploid accessions contained 48 chromosomes and revealed six distinct hybridization signals: three 18/25S rDNA and three 5S rDNA (Fig. 1c, d). The last category exhibited 64 chromosomes and eight signals: four 18/25S rDNA and four 5S rDNA sites (Fig. 1e, f).
Table 2

Level of ploidy, number of chromosomes and signals resulting from FISH with 18/25S rDNA and 5S rDNA probes in accessions of balm (Melissa officinalis)

Accession

Number of chromosomes

Signals of 18/25S rDNA

Signals of 5S rDNA

Ploidy

BLBP 48

32

2

2

diploid

MELI 1

32

2

2

diploid

BLBP 78

48

3

3

triploid

BLBP 113

48

3

3

triploid

MELI 14

64

4

4

tetraploid

MELI 22

64

4

4

tetraploid

Fig. 1

a-f: Mitotic metaphase chromosomes of balm (Melissa officinalis) after FISH with 18/25S rRNA and 5S rRNA-specific probes. Above (a, c, e): FISH, red 18/25S rDNA, green 5S rDNA, arrows mark weak signals, below (b, d, f): DAPI stained chromosomes; a: diploid MELI 1, 2n = 2x = 32; c: triploid BLBP 78, 2n = 3x = 48, e: tetraploid MELI 22, 2n = 4x = 64. The size bars equals 5 μm

In accessions showing six or eight hybridization signals, the intensity of rDNA signals varied. Metaphases of accessions showing six signals displayed one strong and two weak 18/25S rDNA signals (Fig. 1c). The same was true for 5S rRNA sites. Metaphases of genotypes showing eight rDNA signals for each marker, one chromosome pair displayed a strong and one pair a weak hybridization signal (Fig. 1e). Hence accessions with 32 chromosomes and one pair of 18/25S rDNA and 5S rDNA signals are diploid (2n = 2× = 32). Accessions with 48 chromosomes and three rDNA signals are triploid (2n = 3× = 48), and accessions with 64 chromosomes and two pair of rDNA signals are tetraploid (2n = 4× = 48). Therefore, a chromosome basic number of x = 16 in the genus Melissa is likely. In contrast, Darlington and Wylie [4] postulated a basic chromosome number of x = 8 and a somatic number of 2n = 32, without giving any information about investigated subspecies. Later on, Tutin et al. and Pignatti [20, 17] reported a chromosome number of 2n = 32 for M. officinalis ssp. officinalis. M. officinalis ssp. altissima and M. romana has 2n = 64 chromosomes [17, 20]. The reports of Heidari et al. [11] and Murin [15] of 2n = 32 chromosomes and Löve [14] of 2n = 64 chromosomes for M. officinalis provide no information about the analysed subspecies.

Two scenarios regarding the origin of triploid balm can be postulated: an unreduced gamete of a diploid plant formed triploid offspring after fertilization with a haploid gamete. Alternatively, a tetraploid parent hybridized with diploid parent and formed triploid offspring. The different signal intensity of either 5S or 18/25S rDNA sites in triploid balm could be explained by the different copy number of parental rDNA repeats.

Phenotype characterization of triploid balm

The plant phenotype of the four triploid accessions was characterized. Stems of the specimen BLBP 78, BLBP 88, BLBP 111 and BLBP 113 reached 120 to 140 cm (ssp. officinalis 50 to 80 cm, [17]) with tendency of laying down and entangling. The size of leaves (7.6 cm length, standard deviation s 0.59 and 5.4 cm width, s 0.56) was bigger than diploid ssp. officinalis type leaves (6.9 cm length, standard deviation s 0.51 and 4.5 cm width, s 0.42). The internodes are longer (9.4 cm, standard deviation s 0.99) in comparison with diploid ssp. officinalis (6.5 cm, s 0.78) accessions (Table 3). Triploid accessions had very good cold resistance and regenerated faster after winter and harvesting cuts (results not shown). The colour of leaves was bluish to greyish green in comparison to green leaves of ssp. officinalis (Fig. 2). Young leaves of triploid accessions have indumenta similar to ssp. altissima (Fig. 2) whereas according to Tutin et al. [20], leaves of diploid ssp. officinalis are glabrescent or sparsely hairy above, glandular-puberulent and more or less sparsely hairy beneath. Adult leaves of triploid accessions are more similar to ssp. officinalis. Stems of triploid accessions are greyish- or whitish-tomentose beneath with similarity to ssp. altissima. The triploid accessions are not lemon-scented. They had a soap-like, nauseating scent. These plants had an inconspicuous formation of flowers but do not produce any seed, neither under conditions of isolation nor by open pollination, likely due to meiotic problems. These first time described triploid accessions were propagated by cuttings and are cytologically and morphologically stable for at least six years.
Table 3

Length and width of second leaf and length of second internode from base of stem for balm (Melissa officinalis) of different ploidy level

ploidy

leaf length [cm]

leaf width [cm]

internodes [cm]

nb

level

Min

mean

max

sa

min

mean

max

sa

min

mean

max

sa

 

diploid

6.2

6.9

7.5

0.51

4.0

4.5

5.1

0.42

5.8

6.5

8.3

0.78

9

triploid

6.9

7.6

8.1

0.59

4.7

5.4

6.0

0.56

8.4

9.4

10.5

0.99

4

sa standard deviation

nb number of accessions; For each accession at least ten plants were measured

Fig. 2

leaf colour and density of pubescence in balm (Melissa officinalis); a: diploid, b: triploid and c: tetraploid. The size bars equals 1 cm

Conclusions

The basic chromosome number of x = 16 is reported for the first time for the species M. officinalis and for family Labiatae.

This is the first characterization of triploids in M. officinalis. These triploid accessions are sterile but cytologically and morphologically stable. The length and width of the leaves and the length of internodes exceeded the comparable data for diploid accessions but are not significant for all characters.

For exact origin analysis of triploids as well as the characterization of allotetraploid or autotetraploid character of tetraploids analysis of meiotic chromosome pairing is necessary. Chromosome specific molecular markers would open the chance to ascertain the level of similarity of homoeologous groups of chromosomes. This is a prerequisite for better characterization of phylogenetic distance of M. officinalis ssp. altissima in comparison to ssp. officinalis.

Material and methods

Plant materials

A set of 40 accessions of M. officinalis have been characterized, of which 27 and 13 were provided from the Federal ex-situ Collection of Agricultural and Horticultural Plants of the Leibniz Institute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research at Gatersleben, Germany (IPK) and the Bavarian State Institute for Agriculture at Freising, Germany (LfL) respectively. LfL collection contained old varieties and breeding material from middle and western Europe, the IPK collection includes mainly landraces and wild types from eastern and middle Europe (Table 1). All IPK accessions were grown from seeds whereas all LfL accessions were propagated by cuttings starting with a single plant. Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was used as genome size marker in flow cytometry.

Evaluation of ploidy level by flow cytometry

Measuring of relative DNA amount of nuclei occurred by flow cytometry (Facs calibur, Becton Dickinson, BD) with a red fluorescence laser as basis for detection of ploidy level. For each probe, leaf material was chopped with razor blades in 500 μl nuclei extraction buffer (CyStain PI absolute P, Sysmex) and stained with the corresponding staining buffer, containing 5 % polyvinylpyrrolidone 25 (Serva) and 0.6 % propidium iodide (Serva). Immediately after staining, the nuclei suspension was filtered using a 5 ml polystyrene round-button tube with a cell-strainer cap (BD). For reference, radish was measured in separate sample after five samples of balm.

Chromosome preparation

M. officinalis seeds were germinated and the cell division synchronized with 1.25 mM hydroxyurea for 17 h. For vegetative multiplied accessions (LfL), root tips from potted plants were used. In contrast to Pan et al. [16], the recovery time after hydroxyurea treatment was 24 h at 6 °C. Root tips were fixed in ethanol-acetic acid (3:1, 24 h) and stored in 70 % ethanol at −20 °C. After washing with aqua dest. root tips were digested with an enzyme mixture (4 % cellulase, ‘Onozuka R-10’, Serva and 1 % pectlyase Y-23 (Seishin Pharmaceutical)) in 75 mM KCl and 7.5 mM Na-EDTA, (pH 4.0 for 36 min. at 37 °C, [12]). Softened root tips were squashed in 45 % acetic acid. After removal of the coverslip by freezing (−84 °C) the slides were air dried overnight at 24 °C and stored at −20 °C.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

The 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA loci were detected with a 220 bp-long 25S repeat-specific probe labelled with biotin-16-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim) during polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the genomic DNA of Allium ampeloprasum with primers designed according to the sequence published by Yokota et al. [21]. For the localization of 5S rRNA genes, a 117 bp fragment obtained after PCR amplification from the same genomic DNA with specific primers coding for this region [8] was used. The labelling of this amplified probe was performed with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim). The hybridization mixture contained 80 ng of each DNA probe (5S and 25S rDNA) and 10 μg of salmon-sperm DNA in 20 μl of hybridization buffer (50 % deioinized formamide, 10 % dextran sulphate, 2 x SSC) per slide [19].

The FISH procedure was performed according to Fuchs and Schubert [7] with the following modifications: prior to hybridization, slides were incubated in 50 ng/μl of DNase-free RNase in 2 x SSC for 1 h at 37 °C, washed three times in 2 x SSC for 5 min and treated with 0.5 ng/μl of proteinase K for 10 min at 37 °C, followed by three times washing in 2 x SSC for 15 min. The slides were then postfixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 10 min, washed three times in 2 x SSC for 15 min, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (70, 80 and 96 %) at −20 °C, and air-dried. The hybridization mixture (probe) was denaturated (80 °C, 7 min), incubated on ice (about 5 min), dropped onto slides, covered with coverslips, and sealed with rubber cement. Probes and chromosomes were denaturated together on a heated desk (7 min, 80 °C). The slides were then incubated overnight at 37 °C in a humidity chamber. After hybridization and removing the coverslips, the slides were washed in 2 x SSC at 37 °C three times for 5 min each, followed by three 5 min stringent washes in 0.3 x SSC at 60 °C and then blocked for 30 min at 37 °C with a solution of 4 x SSC, 3 % BSA and 0.1 % Tween 20. The biotinylated probe was detected with 10 ng/μl of streptavidin-Cy3 (Dianova) and amplified with two steps of 10 ng/μl of biotinylated anti-streptavidin (Vector) and 10 ng/μl strepavidin-Cy3. Together with the first amplification step of the biotin labelled probe, the detection of the digoxigenin labelled probe with 9 ng/μl of anti-digoxigenin-fluorescein (Roche) was done and then amplified with 8 ng/μl anti-sheep-fluorescein (Dianova). Chromosomes were counterstained and embedded in 15 μl of DAPI-VECTASHIELD antifade solution (Vector Laboratories). Images were captured for each fluorescence dye separately with a cooled CCD camera system Axiocam (Zeiss) on a microscope Axioimager Z1 (Zeiss) with the following filter combinations: 02 (DAPI), 10 (FITC) and 20 (Cy3). Pseudocoloration and mergence of images were done with software of the Isis program (Metasystems).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr U. Lohwasser, Leibniz Institute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research at Gatersleben, Germany and Dr H. Heuberger, Bavarian State Institute for Agriculture at Freising, Germany for providing balm accessions. We are thankful to Dr W.D. Blüthner, Erfurt, Germany for critical discussions and Mrs. K. Maier for technical assistance. The project was funded by Fachagentur für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe FNR: 22019708 (08NR197) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture (BMEL).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops of the Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants

References

  1. Baeza C, Schrader O, Budahn H. Characterization of geographically isolated accessions in five Alstroemeria L. species (Chile) using FISH of tandemly repeated DNA sequences and RAPD analysis. Pl Syst Evol. 2007;269:1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bomme U, Honermeier B, Hoppe B, Kittler J, Lohwasser U, Marthe F. Melisse (Melissa officinalis L.) (Balm (Melissa officinalis L.)). In: Hoppe B, editor. Handbuch des Arznei- und Gewürzpflanzenbaus (Handbook of medicinal and aromatic plants), vol. 5. Bernburg: Saluplanta; 2013. p. 151–73.Google Scholar
  3. DAB. Deutsches Arzneibuch. Stuttgart: Deutscher Apothekerverlag; 2012. p. 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Darlington CD, Wylie AP. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1955. p. 328.Google Scholar
  5. Davis PH. Flora of turkey and the east Aegean islands, Vol. 7. Edinburg: University Press; 1982. p. 262–4.Google Scholar
  6. European Union. Ph. Eur. 8. Pharmacopoea Europaea, 8th Ed., Stuttgart: Deutscher Apothekerverlag; 2014. p. 1799–1802..Google Scholar
  7. Fuchs J, Schubert I. Localization of seed protein genes on metaphase chromosomes of Vicia faba via fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosom Res. 1995;3:94–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gottlob-McHugh SG, Levesque M, Mackenzie K, Olson M, Yarosh O, Johnson DA. Organization of the 5S ribosomal-RNA genes in the soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill and conservation of the 5S rDNA repeat structure in higher plants. Genome. 1990;33:486–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanelt P, Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2001. p. 1995-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Harley RM, Atkins S, Budantsev AL, Cantino PD, Conn BJ, Grayer R, et al. Labiatae. In: Kubitzki K, editor. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. VII Kadereit JW, Flowering plants dicotyledons lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2004. p. 176–7.Google Scholar
  11. Heidari P, Mehrabi AA. Nasrolah Nezhad Ghomi AA. Cytogenetic diversity of Iranian balm (Melissa officinalis) landraces and genetic relationship within and between them using ITS markers. Biharean Biologist. 2013;7(2):94–8.Google Scholar
  12. Kakeda K, Fukui K, Yamagata H. Heterochromatic differentiation in barley chromosomes revealed by C- and N-banding techniques. Theor Appl Genet. 1991;81:144–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Krüger H, Schütze W, Lohwasser U, Marthe F. Qualität bei Melisse – gestern und heute: Hydroxyzimtsäurederivate versus Rosmarinsäure, vergleichende Untersuchungen an einer Melissenkollektion (Melissa officinalis L.) (Quality of melissa-yesterday and today: hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives versus rosmarinic acid, comparative investigations of a Melissa collection (Melissa officinalis L.)). Z Arznei- Gewürzpfla. 2010;15(1):31–2.Google Scholar
  14. Löve A. IOBP chromosome number reports LXXVIII. Taxon. 1983;32:138–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Murin A. Karyotaxonomy of some medicinal and aromatic plants. Thaiszia. 1997;7:75–88.Google Scholar
  16. Pan WH, Houben A, Schlegel R. Highly effective cell synchronization in plant roots by hydroxyurea and amiprophos-methyl or colchicine. Genome. 1993;36:387–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pignatti S. Flora d’Italia (Flora of Italy), vol. 2. Bologna: Edagricole; 1982. p. 475.Google Scholar
  18. Schrader O, Ahne R, Fuchs J, Schubert I. Karyotype analysis of Helianthus annuus using Giemsa banding and fluorescence in situ Hybridization. Chromosom Res. 1997;5:451–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Schrader O, Budahn H, Ahne R. Detection of 5S and 25S rRNA genes in Sinapis alba, Raphanus sativus and Brassica napus by double fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100:665–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, et al. Flora europaea. Vol. 3, Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. Cambridge: University Press; 1972. p. 162–3.Google Scholar
  21. Yokota Y, Kawata T, Iida Y, Kato A, Tanifuji S. Nucleotide-sequences of the 5.8S ribosomal-RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer regions in carrot and broad bean. J Mol Evol. 1989;29:294–301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kittler et al. 2015