Open Access

Functional consequences of copy number variants in miscarriage

  • Jiadi Wen1, 2,
  • Courtney W Hanna2, 3,
  • Sally Martell2,
  • Peter CK Leung2, 4,
  • Suzanne ME Lewis3,
  • Wendy P Robinson2, 3,
  • Mary D Stephenson5 and
  • Evica Rajcan-Separovic1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cytogenetics20158:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0109-8

Received: 13 December 2014

Accepted: 9 January 2015

Published: 31 January 2015

Abstract

Background

The presence of unique copy number variations (CNVs) in miscarriages suggests that their integral genes have a role in maintaining early pregnancy. In our previous work, we identified 19 unique CNVs in ~40% of studied euploid miscarriages, which were predominantly familial in origin. In our current work, we assessed their relevance to miscarriage by expression analysis of 14 genes integral to CNVs in available miscarriage chorionic villi. As familial CNVs could cause miscarriage due to imprinting effect, we investigated the allelic expression of one of the genes (TIMP2) previously suggested to be maternally expressed in placenta and involved in placental remodelling and embryo development.

Results

Six out of fourteen genes had detectable expression in villi and for three genes the RNA and protein expression was altered due to maternal CNVs. These genes were integral to duplication on Xp22.2 (TRAPPC2 and OFD1) or disrupted by a duplication mapping to 17q25.3 (TIMP2). RNA and protein expression was increased for TRAPPC2 and OFD1 and reduced for TIMP2 in carrier miscarriages. The three genes have roles in processes important for pregnancy development such as extracellular matrix homeostasis (TIMP2 and TRAPPC2) and cilia function (OFD1). TIMP2 allelic expression was not affected by the CNV in miscarriages in comparison to control elective terminations.

Conclusion

We propose that functional studies of CNVs could help determine if and how the miscarriage CNVs affect the expression of integral genes. In case of parental CNVs, assessment of the function of their integral genes in parental reproductive tissues should be also considered in the future, especially if they affect processes relevant for pregnancy development and support.

Keywords

Miscarriage Copy number variation TIMP2 OFD1 TRAPPC2 Gene expression

Background

Genetic factors, such as single gene defects and chromosomal abnormalities, are a common cause of miscarriage [1-3]. Their identification is important for informed reproductive decisions and counselling and is the key goal of reproductive genetics [4,5]. The detection of chromosomal abnormalities has been recently revolutionized with the development of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) which facilitates the detection of large scale and subtle chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications (DNA copy number variants or CNVs). CMA is based on the assessment of DNA directly obtained from tissues and thus minimizes the negative impact of tissue culture artefacts and failure associated with traditional cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages.

Due to its many benefits, including improved resolution and diagnostic yield, CMA is now considered a first line test for subjects with postnatal developmental delay and congenital abnormalities [6,7]. It identifies clinically relevant CNVs in 10-15% of chromosomally normal cases, with the majority of CNVs undetectable by routine karyotyping. In contrast, array studies of miscarriages are still rare, and no more than 3000 cases worldwide were reported [3]. Most of the miscarriage cases (2392) were described in the recent publication by Levy et al. [8], which reported putatively causative CNVs in 1.6% of chromosomally normal cases. These CNVs were defined as >5 Mb or overlapping with critical regions causing or predisposing to viable microdeletion/duplication syndromes.

Interestingly, the majority of CNVs identified so far in miscarriages with a normal karyotype were familial in origin. CNVs inherited from normal parents are generally considered less likely to be causative of an abnormal phenotype, however, they can be pathogenic if they i) uncover a mutation within the intact allele of the developmental gene in the conceptus, ii) contain genes with variable expressivity or penetrance iii) involve imprinting (parent of origin dependent) genes. In addition, parental CNVs could still lead to miscarriage if they affect genes required for normal parental reproductive function, including, for example, genes required for placenta function, maternal preparation for and maintenance of pregnancy and genomic stability of the sperm. These processes are essential for successful pregnancy outcome [9], but may not necessarily impair parents’ overall health status and can demonstrate pathogenic characteristics only at the time of pregnancy. Recently, Nagirnaja et al. [10], suggested that a CNV from 5p13.3 chromosomal region is enriched in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in comparison to fertile controls and could represent a risk factor for pregnancy complications, as it contains genes predominantly expressed in placenta.

We have recently performed CMA analysis of miscarriages from couples with RPL and sporadic miscarriages with embryoscopy findings [11,12]. Unique CNVs not reported in Database of Genomic Variants were noted in ~40% of miscarriages and were predominantly parental in origin, making their interpretation more challenging. In order to further investigate the potential role of these CNVs in miscarriage we performed functional analysis (RNA and protein expression) of genes integral to miscarriage CNVs, using chorionic villi from miscarriages from 6 families with RPL, reported in our previous work. Our study shows changes in RNA/protein expression for 3/14 tested genes from maternal CNVs, which could be of relevance for miscarriage due to their role in processes important for growth of the conceptus and/or maternal preparation for and support of pregnancy. Functional studies of miscarriage CNVs could therefore help identify miscarriage candidate genes, but should be accompanied with functional studies of CNVs in reproductive tissues of carrier parents.

Results

Expression of genes integral to CNVs in miscarriage cell cultures

Three genes, OFD1, TRAPPC2 and TIMP2 out of 14 selected for expression analysis had altered mRNA and protein expression in cultured miscarriage chorionic villi cells (Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2). For NDUFAF2, CHSY3 and PRMT3 (Table 1) the expression in control pregnancies and miscarriages with CNVs was comparable. The remaining genes assayed had either very low or no expression in cultured chorionic villi from controls (PARK, LIPC, CTNNA3, EGFL6, GPM6B, RAB9A, POU6F2 and C7orf10) and were not assessed in miscarriages.
Table 1

CNV gene analysis

Samples

Miscarriage

Locus

Breakpoint

CNV size (kb)

Type of CNV and origin

Gene picked for expression (type of CNV abnormality)

mRNA expression in control elective terminations/miscarriage that carries the CNV

Protein expression

Miscarriages from reference Rajcan-Separovic et al. [12]

03-3A

6q26

162126633-162271770

145

loss-pat

PARK2 (loss involves part of exon and intron)

N/not attempted

 

05-3A

5q12.1

60407026-60464658

58

loss-pat

NDUFAF2 (loss involves exon 3)

yes/no difference between CNV carriers and controls

 

06-3A,B,C and D (not in 3E)

17q25.3

74381287-74466887

86

gain-mat

TIMP2 (gain involves exon1,2)

yes/decrease in CNV carriers

decreased

06-3E

15q22.1

56487120-56562873

76

loss-pat

LIPC (loss of exon1)

N/not attempted

 

07-3A

10q21.3

67992425-68064617

72

loss-mat

CTNNA3 (loss involves exon11)

N/not attempted

 

09-3B (not in 3A)

Xp22.2

13415099-13745233

33

gain-mat

EGFL6 (complete gain)

N/not attempted

 

GPM6B (almost complete gain)

N/not attempted

 

OFD1 (complete gain)

yes/increase in CNV carrier

increased in CNV carrier

RAB9A (complete gain)

N/not attempted

 

TRAPPC2 (complete gain)

yes/increase in CNV carrier

increased in CNV carrier

10-3A

5q23.3

129388119-129441487

53

loss-pat

CHSY3 (CSS3) (loss involes intron)

yes/no difference between CNV carrier and controls

 

11p15.1

20442396-20559837

117

Gain-pat

PRMT3 (gain involves exon9-11)

yes/no difference between CNV carrier and controls

 

7p14.1

39470588-39647671

177

Gain-mat

POU6F2 (gain involves last exon)

N/not attempted

 

C7orf10 (complete gain)

N/not attempted

 

N = expression in control villi tissue low or not detectable, the expression in miscarriage therefore not attempted.

Figure 1

mRNA and protein expression of OFD1 and TRAPPC2 in primary culture of human chorionic villi. ET 15, 17, 18 and 20 indicate control samples from the cell cultures of elective terminations (n = 4). 09-3A and B indicate miscarriages from female 09–1. mRNA (i) and protein (ii) values for (A) OFD1 and (B) TRAPPC2 expression were normalized to the corresponding ß-actin mRNA levels. The results derived from at least three repeats of each sample and the mean level of each sample is represented in the scatter graph. The difference between the four control samples (as a group) and the two CNV carrier miscarriages, as two groups, has been evaluated by Student t-test (*, p < 0.05).

Figure 2

mRNA and protein expression of TIMP2 in primary culture of human chorionic villi. ET15, 17, 18 and 20 indicate control cell cultures from elective terminations (n = 4). 06-3A, C, D and E indicate miscarriages of the female 06–1 (n = 4). (A) mRNA and (B) protein values for TIMP2 expression were normalized to the corresponding ß-actin mRNA levels. The results derived from at least three repeats of each sample and the mean level of each sample is represented in the scatter graph. The difference between the four control samples and the three CNV carrier miscarriages, as two groups, has been evaluated by student t-test (*, p < 0.05).

OFD1 and TRAPPC2 are integral to a CNV on Xp22.2 (duplication with breakpoints from 13415099–13745233) identified by Agilent 105 k array (Figure One in Rajcan-Separovic et al. [12]) in female 09–1 who had 6 miscarriages (current paper, Additional file 1: Table S1). Two of her 6 miscarriages had array analysis: male miscarriage 09-3A had a normal array result, while female miscarriage 09-3B inherited the maternal Xp22.2 CNV. These two miscarriages were available for functional analysis. Increased RNA and protein expression for OFD1 and TRAPPC2 was detected in 09-3B (Figure 1), while the remainder of the genes from the Xp22.2 CNV (EGFL6, GPM6B, and RAB9A) had low or undetectable expression in control ET cell cultures and were not evaluated in 09-3B (Table 1). Random chromosome X inactivation was identified in 09-3B, while the mother’s chromosome X inactivation status was uninformative [12].

The CNV disrupting the TIMP2 gene mapped to 17q25.3 (duplication with breakpoints from 74,381,287 -74,466,887) and was detected in female 6–1 and in 4/5 available miscarriages, as reported previously (Figure Two in Rajcan-Separovic et al. [12]). Cell cultures from chorionic villi were available from four miscarriages (06-3A, C, D which contained the CNV and 06-3E which did not). The three miscarriages with the TIMP2 CNV (06-3A, C and D) showed a ~50% decrease in mRNA and protein expression in comparison to four control elective terminations (ET 15, 17, 18 and 20). A ~2-fold increase of TIMP2 mRNA and protein was noted in the fourth miscarriage (06-3E), which did not carry the TIMP2 CNV (Figure 2).

TIMP2 Allelic expression analysis

Based on previous reports suggesting preferential maternal expression of TIMP2 in placenta [13], we tested the parent-of-origin specific expression of TIMP2 in control ET and in miscarriages from female 06–1 to determine if the CNV affected the TIMP2 allelic expression. Monoallelic expression of the maternal allele was detected in 2 of 3 informative miscarriages (06-3C with and 06-3E without the CNV, Figure 3) while a close to biallelic expression (~60%) was noted in the third miscarriage (06-3D) which was trisomic for chromosome 16 and contained the TIMP2 CNV. Monoallelic expression of the maternal allele was also noted in two of the seven informative ET samples heterozygous for the polymorphic rs2277698 G/A SNP in exon 3 (out of 35 genotyped). The cells from the remaining 5 control and informative ETs had biparental expression.
Figure 3

Allelic expression of TIMP2 gene. (A) schematic diagram of the structure of the TIMP2 gene region, including its 5 exons (grey bars) and transcription start site (TSS). Important genomic features, including the copy number variation (CNV) identified in the recurrent miscarriage family, and a polymorphic coding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) used to assess TIMP2 allelic expression have been labelled. (B) Percentage gene expression of the major allele for rs2277698 in exon 3 of TIMP2 gene in informative chorionic villi from 1st trimester elective terminations (ET) and miscarriages from recurrent miscarriage family 06. Miscarriage 06-3C and 06-3D had the CNV while miscarriage 06-3E did not.

Discussion

In this study we explored further the miscarriage CNVs we identified in our previous work by testing the expression levels of their integral genes in available miscarriage tissues with CNVs. Three genes integral to maternal CNVs had altered expression in miscarriages consistent with genomic alternation caused by the CNV.

TRAPPC2 and OFD1 had increased RNA and protein expression in miscarriage 9-3B with a gain of Xp22.2. TRAPPC2 has a role in procollagen transportation [14] while OFD1 regulates cilia function [15]. Collagens are the main components of extracellular matrix (ECM) and provide structural support for the tissues, but also play important roles in cell growth, differentiation, adhesion, and migration [16,17]. The dysfunction of OFD1, through abnormal ciliogenesis, results in defects in sonic hedgehog (Shh) and canonical Wnt signaling pathways [15,18-20] which are linked to abnormal implantation and embryonic development [21-23]. Although the mis-expression of TRAPPC2 and OFD1 could potentially explain miscarriage 9-3B, the Xp22.2 CNV was not present in miscarriage 09-3A, and therefore cannot be associated with all the pregnancy losses of female 09–1. Instead, the unifying cause of her miscarriages could be the effect of the CNV on maternal OFD1 and TRAPPC2 gene expression, particularly because of the reports of abnormal uterine collagen content resulting in pregnancy loss [24,25]. It would be of interest the explore the expression of these genes in the decidua of female 9–1. Unfortunately this tissue was not available for analysis.

TIMP2 is the third gene that showed altered expression in miscarriages and is known to inhibit matrix metaloproteases (MMPs), which degrade extra cellular matrix (ECM), and have a critical role in tissue remodelling and angiogenesis in placenta/endometrium [26-29]. Expression of TIMP2 was reduced in miscarriages with the CNV, possibly because the CNV (duplication) disrupts the 5′ end of the gene and causes structural alternations in the genomic region of TIMP2. It has been previously observed that the genomic position of regulatory elements in the TIMP2 promoter (AP-1) affects the gene expression [30]. However, the CNV appears not to be the sole cause of recurrent miscarriage in this family as TIMP2 expression was also altered (increased) in the miscarriage without the CNV. It is conceivable that, due to the CNV, the expression of TIMP2 is also abnormal (reduced) in the endometrium/decidua of female 6–1 and could impair pregnancy development. This is of interest considering that decidual TIMP2 has a role in regulating trophoblast invasion by modulating trophoblast MMP and TIMP2 expression [31], and in particular inhibiting trophoblast TIMP2 expression. In keeping with the possibility of the effect of the maternal and/or pregnancy CNV on TIMP2 function are the pathology findings for six out of ten miscarriages from female 6–1 which demonstrated morphologic abnormalities of the maternal vasculature (intimal hyperplasia of maternal vessels) and/or placenta (perivillous fibrin deposits) [12] (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Familial CNVs are frequently hypothesised to cause an adverse outcome of the pregnancy if they contain or disrupt imprinting genes. Previous reports suggested that TIMP2 is an imprinted gene with preferential maternal expression in placenta. This was based on observations of reduced expression in placenta from complete moles [13], and overexpression of the maternal copy in a mouse model of RPL [32]. We were therefore interested in finding out if the maternal CNV, disrupting the TIMP2 gene, affects its allelic expression in miscarriages that carry the CNV. Our parent of origin expression analysis demonstrated biallelic expression in most cases including one miscarriage with the CNV. However, it appears that the regulation of TIMP2 allelic expression is complex, as it was preferentially maternal in 2/3 miscarriages and 2/7 ETs. It is possible that the allelic expression of this gene is affected by the degree of clonality after placental cell culture, the ratio of methylation of CpG islands (Chernov, et al. [33]), or additional genetic polymorphisms affecting gene expression on one or the other copy. Comprehensive analysis of epigenetic marks at the TIMP2 gene promoter region(s) in relation to expression is needed to elucidate whether this gene is indeed imprinted and which modifications are important for regulation of gene expression.

Conclusion

Overall, our findings underscore the need for additional functional characterization of miscarriage CNVs to develop an understanding of the effect of their integral genes on pregnancy development. These studies can be challenging due to lack of miscarriage cell cultures or RNA/protein for functional studies in miscarriages and lack of parental reproductive tissues in cases with parental CNVs. Collection of reproductive tissues (e.g. maternal decidua) for functional analysis would be desirable in future miscarriage CNV analysis. As more miscarriage associated CNVs and genes are identified, their individual and collective role in miscarriage will become more apparent.

Methods

Subjects

Control pregnancy and miscarriage tissues

Control chorionic villus samples were obtained from first trimester elective terminations (ET) of pregnancy for social reasons by dilation and curettage (6–12 weeks of gestation). The control ET had no evidence of aneuploidy as determined by multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) [34]. Four ET tissues were used for tissue culture, as previously described [35]. Thirty five uncultured ET tissues were assessed for allelic expression analysis of TIMP2 gene (see below).

Chorionic villus cell cultures of 10 miscarriages from 6 families (03,05,06,07,09 and 10 as described in Table 1 in the current paper and in Rajcan-Separovic et al. [12]) were available for RNA and protein expression analysis.Culture conditions were as for the ET tissues [35].

Maternal contamination has been ruled out in all ET and miscarriage cultures by examining microsatellite markers, using standard protocols [12,36]. The use of parental blood samples, control and miscarriage tissues was approved by the Committee for Ethical Review of Research involving Human Subjects, University of British Columbia and Institutional Review Board of the University of Chicago. All subjects gave written informed consent for these studies.

Expression analysis

RNA, DNA and protein extraction

Total RNA, DNA and protein were extracted from the chorionic villus (CV) cell cultures simultaneously using commercially available kits (AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini kit, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and concentration of total RNA, DNA and protein present in each of these extracts were quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA).

For allelic expression analysis, RNA and DNA were extracted from ET tissue stored in RNA later. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was used to obtain fetal genotype and informative (heterozygous) samples were used for the allelic expression analysis.

cDNA synthesis

Aliquots of the total RNA extracts (~500 ng) prepared from the CV cell cultures were subsequently reverse-transcribed into cDNA using GeneAmp Gold RNA PCR Core Kit (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia). High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia) was used to generate cDNA from 35 ET tissues for TIMP2 allelic expression analysis.

Real-time quantitative (q)PCR

RNA expression analysis was performed in cultured chorionic villi from miscarriages with CNVs and four ETs. Fourteen genes integral to the miscarriage CNVs were selected, and bioinformatics tools and publicly available human genome databases (Ensemble Genome Browser, UCSC) are used to select appropriate primers. The genes for expression analysis were selected based on the availability of cells/RNA/protein from miscarriages that contained their copy number change and included: PARK2, NDUFAF2, TIMP2, LIPC, CTNNA3, EGFL6, GPM6B, OFD1, RAB9A, TRAPPC2, CHSY3, PRMT3, POU6F2, and C7orf10 (Table 1). The nucleotide sequences for primers specific for the 14 genes or the housekeeping gene β-actin were designed using Primer Express software (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). Primer sequences for tested regions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2. The first-strand cDNA generated from the chorionic villi cells served as a template for qRT-PCR using the ABI PRISM 7300 Sequence Detection System (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) equipped with a 96-well optical reaction plate for primers specific for 14 selected genes and the housekeeping gene, β-actin. Real-time qPCR was performed as previously described [37].

Western blot analysis

We detected changes in RNA expression for 3 genes in miscarriages: OFD1 and TRAPPC2 from Xp22 CNV (present in female 09–1 and one out of two miscarriages) and TIMP2 from 17q25 CNV (present in female 6–1 and 4/5 miscarriages). Protein expression analysis for these genes was performed using polyclonal antibodies directed against human OFD1 (Abcam, No. ab97861, ON, Canada), TRAPPC2 (generous gift from Dr De Matteis, Italy) and TIMP2 (NovusBiologicals, No. NB100-92000, Littleton, US). To standardize the amounts of protein loaded into each lane, the blots were reprobed with a monoclonal antibody directed against human β-actin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, US). The ECL Western Blotting system was used to detect the amount of each antibody bound to antigen and the resultant photographic films were analyzed by UV densitometry (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, USA). The absorbance values obtained for OFD1, TRAPPC2 or TIMP2 were then normalized relative to the corresponding β-actin absorbance value. The average of OFD1, TRAPPC2 and TIMP2 protein expression were obtained from 3 independent replicates for each miscarriage and ET control samples.

Allelic expression analysis of TIMP2 gene

We assessed the effect of the CNV on allelic expression in miscarriages from female 6–1 rather than methylation since the TIMP2 promoter is unmethylated in cervix and blood [38], human term placenta (unpublished data) and mouse placenta throughout pregnancy [39]. Three heterozygous SNPs were identified within the exons of the TIMP2 gene using UCSC Genome Browser: rs7503726 and rs2277698 in the 5′UTR and rs2277698 within exon 3. Genotyping assays were designed for all three SNPs, using the PSQ Assay Design Software; with successful targeted amplification for only the rs2277698 G/A SNP in exon 3 (heterozygosity = 0.241 ± 0.250) (Additional file 1: Table S3). Genotyping was done on the Pyromark MD machine using the PyroGold SQA reagent kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), using gDNA from placenta to obtain fetal genotypes. Genotyping was performed on DNA from 35 ET samples and 5 miscarriages from female 6–1 with RPL, 4/5 carried the TIMP2 CNV. 7/35 ET and 3/5 tested miscarriages were informative (heterozygous). Parental origin of the rs2277698 alleles in ET and miscarriage samples was determined by assessing maternal genotypes in DNA extracted from the placental decidua or blood. The sequencing primer used for the gDNA assay (Additional file 1: Table S3), was then used to assess whether there was allelic bias in expression of TIMP2 in the cDNA, after cDNA-specific amplification. The relative percentage of expressed alleles was obtained using the allelic quantification setting on the Pyromark MD software, and averaging of two independent replicates for each sample.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were performed using the VassarStats: Statistical Computation Web Site (Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, USA), R Statistical Software 2.12.0 (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Auckland, New Zealand) or GraphPad Prism 4 computer software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Student’s t-test was used to determine significant differences in transcript levels between the four miscarriages from family 6 with available cultures (3 that carry the TIMP2 CNV and one without it) and four control ETs. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Significance between the variances of the two groups was determined using F- test.

The absorbance values obtained from the real-time qPCR products and the photograph generated by Western blotting were subjected to statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism 4 computer software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Statistical significance between the absorbance values were assessed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA), with p < 0.05 considered significant. Comparison of the means between patients and controls were determined using Dunnett’s test. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. from at least three independent experiments.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by CIHR (grant MOP 106467) and MSFHR Career Scholar salary award to ERS. We appreciate the generous gift of the TRAPPC2 antibody from Dr De Matteis (Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Via Pietro Castellino 111, Naples 80131, Italy).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia
(2)
Child & Family Research Institute
(3)
Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia
(4)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia
(5)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago

References

  1. Warren JE, Silver RM. Genetics of pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(1):84–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Group ECW. Genetic aspects of female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):293–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(12):1951–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stembalska A, Slezak R, Pesz K, Gil J, Sasiadek M. Prenatal diagnosis–principles of diagnostic procedures and genetic counseling. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2007;45 Suppl 1:S11–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stephenson M, Kutteh W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(1):132–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(5):749–64.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang JU, Koo SH. Evolving applications of microarray technology in postnatal diagnosis (review). Int J Mol Med. 2012;30(2):223–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Levy B, Sigurjonsson S, Pettersen B, Maisenbacher MK, Hall MP, Demko Z, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):202–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsen EC, Christiansen OB, Kolte AM, Macklon N. New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Med. 2013;11:154.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagirnaja L, Palta P, Kasak L, Rull K, Christiansen OB, Nielsen HS, et al. Structural genomic variation as risk factor for idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(8):972–82.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rajcan-Separovic E, Qiao Y, Tyson C, Harvard C, Fawcett C, Kalousek D, et al. Genomic changes detected by array CGH in human embryos with developmental defects. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(2):125–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rajcan-Separovic E, Diego-Alvarez D, Robinson WP, Tyson C, Qiao Y, Harvard C, et al. Identification of copy number variants in miscarriages from couples with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(11):2913–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Okamoto T, Niu R, Yamada S, Osawa M. Reduced expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 in gestational trophoblastic diseases. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8(4):392–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Venditti R, Scanu T, Santoro M, Di Tullio G, Spaar A, Gaibisso R, et al. Sedlin controls the ER export of procollagen by regulating the Sar1 cycle. Science. 2012;337(6102):1668–72.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrante MI, Zullo A, Barra A, Bimonte S, Messaddeq N, Studer M, et al. Oral-facial-digital type I protein is required for primary cilia formation and left-right axis specification. Nat Genet. 2006;38(1):112–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aplin AC, Fogel E, Zorzi P, Nicosia RF. The aortic ring model of angiogenesis. Methods Enzymol. 2008;443:119–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heino J. The collagen family members as cell adhesion proteins. Bioessays. 2007;29(10):1001–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunkapiller J, Singla V, Seol A, Reiter JF. The ciliogenic protein oral-facial-digital 1 regulates the neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20(5):831–41.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cortellino S, Wang C, Wang B, Bassi MR, Caretti E, Champeval D, et al. Defective ciliogenesis, embryonic lethality and severe impairment of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway caused by inactivation of the mouse complex A intraflagellar transport gene Ift122/Wdr10, partially overlapping with the DNA repair gene Med1/Mbd4. Dev Biol. 2009;325(1):225–37.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrante MI, Romio L, Castro S, Collins JE, Goulding DA, Stemple DL, et al. Convergent extension movements and ciliary function are mediated by ofd1, a zebrafish orthologue of the human oral-facial-digital type 1 syndrome gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(2):289–303.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harman RM, Cowan RG, Ren Y, Quirk SM. Reduced signaling through the hedgehog pathway in the uterine stroma causes deferred implantation and embryonic loss. Reproduction. 2011;141(5):665–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen Q, Zhang Y, Lu J, Wang Q, Wang S, Cao Y, et al. Embryo-uterine cross-talk during implantation: the role of Wnt signaling. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(4):215–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohamed OA, Dufort D, Clarke HJ. Expression and estradiol regulation of Wnt genes in the mouse blastocyst identify a candidate pathway for embryo-maternal signaling at implantation. Biol Reprod. 2004;71(2):417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Diao H, Aplin JD, Xiao S, Chun J, Li Z, Chen S, et al. Altered spatiotemporal expression of collagen types I, III, IV, and VI in Lpar3-deficient peri-implantation mouse uterus. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(2):255–65.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, Nakano R. Decreased type IV collagen expression by human decidual tissues in spontaneous abortion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(8):2925–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy G. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Genome Biol. 2011;12(11):233.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Curry Jr TE, Osteen KG. The matrix metalloproteinase system: changes, regulation, and impact throughout the ovarian and uterine reproductive cycle. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(4):428–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang H, Wen Y, Mooney S, Li H, Behr B, Polan ML. Matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase expression in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2003;80 Suppl 2:736–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Brew K, Nagase H. The tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): an ancient family with structural and functional diversity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1803(1):55–71.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammani K, Blakis A, Morsette D, Bowcock AM, Schmutte C, Henriet P, et al. Structure and characterization of the human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(41):25498–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Godbole G, Suman P, Gupta SK, Modi D. Decidualized endometrial stromal cell derived factors promote trophoblast invasion. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(4):1278–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dixon ME, Chien EK, Osol G, Callas PW, Bonney EA. Failure of decidual arteriolar remodeling in the CBA/J x DBA/2 murine model of recurrent pregnancy loss is linked to increased expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(1):113–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chernov AV, Sounni NE, Remacle AG, Strongin AY. Epigenetic control of the invasion-promoting MT1-MMP/MMP-2/TIMP-2 axis in cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(19):12727–34.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Diego-Alvarez D, Ramos-Corrales C, Garcia-Hoyos M, Bustamante-Aragones A, Cantalapiedra D, Diaz-Recasens J, et al. Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):958–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham CH, Lysiak JJ, McCrae KR, Lala PK. Localization of transforming growth factor-beta at the human fetal-maternal interface: role in trophoblast growth and differentiation. Biol Reprod. 1992;46(4):561–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tyson C, Harvard C, Locker R, Friedman JM, Langlois S, Lewis ME, et al. Submicroscopic deletions and duplications in individuals with intellectual disability detected by array-CGH. Am J Med Genet. 2005;139(3):173–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wen J, Lopes F, Soares G, Farrell SA, Nelson C, Qiao Y, et al. Phenotypic and functional consequences of haploinsufficiency of genes from exocyst and retinoic acid pathway due to a recurrent microdeletion of 2p13.2. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:100.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ivanova T, Vinokurova S, Petrenko A, Eshilev E, Solovyova N, Kisseljov F, et al. Frequent hypermethylation of 5' flanking region of TIMP-2 gene in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(6):882–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim HR, Han RX, Diao YF, Park CS, Jin DI. Epigenetic characterization of the PBEF and TIMP-2 genes in the developing placentae of normal mice. BMB Rep. 2011;44(8):535–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement