Research | Open | Published:
Karyotypic analysis and FISH mapping of microsatellite motifs reveal highly differentiated XX/XY sex chromosomes in the pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella, Pygopodidae, Squamata)
Molecular Cytogeneticsvolume 6, Article number: 60 (2013)
The infraorder Gekkota is intriguing because it contains multiple chromosomal and environmental sex determination systems that vary even among closely related taxa. Here, we compare male and females karyotypes of the pink-tailed worm-lizard (Aprasia parapulchella), a small legless lizard belonging to the endemic Australian family Pygopodidae.
We applied comparative genomic hybridization to reveal an XX/XY sex chromosome system in which the Y chromosome is highly differentiated from the X in both gross morphology and DNA sequence. In addition, FISH mapping has revealed that two microsatellite repeat motifs, (AGAT)n and (AC)n, have been amplified multiple times on the Y chromosome.
XY karyotypes are found in other pygopodids (Delma inornata and Lialis burtonis), suggesting that the common ancestor of Pygopodidae also had XY sex chromosomes. However, the morphology and size of the Y chromosomes are different among the three species, suggesting that the processes underlying the evolution of sex chromosomes in the Pygopodidae involved chromosome rearrangements and accumulation and amplification of repeats.
Sex determination in reptiles shows astonishing diversity in comparison with other amniotes. It includes temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) in many turtles, all crocodiles, the tuatara and many lizards, a wide variety of female heterogamety and male heterogamety sex chromosomal forms including species with multiple sex chromosomes, and species in which temperature and sex chromosomes combine influence to determine sex [1–5]. Nowhere is this evolutionary lability more evident than that among the Gekkota, the oldest radiation of squamates. This infraorder includes species with XX/XY and ZZ/ZW modes of sex determination and TSD, with different sex determination forms even within the same family (Figure 1).
The Pygopodidae, endemic to Australia and New Guinea , is Gondwanan in origin and sits together with Australian geckos from the families Carphodactylidae and Diplodactylidae, within the infraorder Gekkota [6, 9]. The three Australian Gekkota families diverged around 70 million years ago (Figure 1A). Species within Pygopodidae are known as flap-footed lizards or legless lizard because they have no forelimbs but retain vestigial hind limbs in the form of small scaly flaps . The Family comprises seven genera – Aprasia, Delma, Lialis, Ophidiocephalus, Paradelma, Pletholax and Pygopus. Lineages represented today by Delma and then Lialis are the first genera to diverge from a common ancestor (Figure 1B) [8, 9].
Pygopodids have chromosomes ranging in number from 2n = 34 in Lialis burtonis to 36 in Delma inornata and 38 in D. fraseri, Ophidiocephalus spp. and Pygopus spp.. Only two species, Delma inornata and Lialis burtonis, have the direction of heterogamety determined, and both have male heterogamety [13, 14]. However, there are some important differences between the two species. D. inornata has XX/XY sex chromosomes in which the submetacentric Y chromosome is much larger than acrocentric X chromosome , whereas L. burtonis has an X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y sex chromosome system with the Y chromosome being intermediate in size between the X1 and X2 chromosomes . Based on the presence of male heterogamety in these two species, pygopodids are generally regarded to have male heterogamety , but this generalization is premature given that these two species represent only 2 out of seven pygopodid genera. Most chromosomal studies of this family have been equivocal on the sex chromosomes, so it is not yet clear that male heterogamety is the universal or even typical state.
The Pink-tailed worm-lizard, Aprasia parapulchella, is a small pygopodid [8, 10, 15] largely confined in distribution to the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and a few remaining outlying populations in the New South Wales and Victoria . At present, A. parapulchella is threatened with extinction through habitat loss caused by conversion to farmland or urban development. In a previous study  using 25 microsatellite loci, two loci, APP6 (Accession no. JQ713339 containing the microsatellite motifs CATT and GT) and APP40 (JQ713352 containing the microsatellite motif AGAT), showed sex specific polymorphisms. Each of the two loci was heterozygous in only 4 of 40 males (10%) but heterozygous in 33 of 69 females (50%) and 23 of 69 females (33.3.%), respectively. These two loci are likely to be linked to the sex chromosomes in this species.
In this study, we examined karyotype of A. parapulchella and identified the sex chromosome of this species using comparative genomic hybridization. In addition, we also mapped three microsatellite motifs – AGAT, AATG (reverse complement of CATT) and AC (reverse complement of GT) – to chromosomes using FISH and inferred the process of sex chromosome differentiation in this species.
DAPI-staining of the karyotypes identified the diploid number of chromosomes for A. parapulchella to be 2n = 42 (Figure 2A, B). The chromosomes showed gradual variations in size so that there was no clear division into macro and microchromosomes, which is atypical for reptiles. Comparison of the karyotypes between males and females showed a heteromorphic pair in males (Figure 2A, B), indicating that this species has XY sex chromosomes. It was difficult to distinguish X and Y chromosomes from autosomes based on size and morphology alone, but they are mid-sized and small-sized chromosomes, respectively.
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
CGH images showed a bright hybridization signal on one of the small chromosomes in metaphase spreads in males but not in females (Figure 2C, D). This is further evidence that A. parapulchella has a XX/XY sex chromosomes, that the Y chromosome is smaller than the X. The X chromosome is not distinguishable from the autosomes by CGH.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of microsatellite motifs
Three microsatellite motifs, (AATG)8, (AGAT)8, and (AC)15, were mapped by FISH on to the chromosomes of both sexes. The (AATG)8 probe showed no specific signal in either male or female metaphases (data not shown) whereas (AGAT)8 showed intense hybridization signal at the centromeric region of one small size chromosome in the male metaphase (Figure 3A), but not in the female metaphase (Figure 3B). This suggests that the AGAT microsatellite repeat has been amplified on the centromeric region of the Y chromosome in this species but not on the X. A bright and large hybridization signal from the (AC)15 motif was observed on a small chromosome in male metaphase but not in female metaphase (Figure 3C, D) whilst also being observed on one pair of small chromosomes and one pair of large chromosomes in both sexes (Figure 3C, D). We infer from this that the AC microsatellite repeat is also amplified on the Y chromosome and not on the X, with shared repeats in two other pairs of chromosomes.
Our analysis has demonstrated that the chromosome number of A. parapulchella is 2n = 42, the largest among all pygopodids thus far examined. The most common karyotype found among species of Diplodactylidae and Carphodactylidae is 38 acrocentric chromosomes , shared by pygopodid species of Delma, Ophidiocephalus and Pygopus, suggests that the chromosome number in the common ancestor of the Pygopodidae was also 38. It therefore appears likely that the chromosome number has increased in the lineage of A. parapulchella possibly through chromosome inversions and subsequent fissions.
The intense CGH signal on a single chromosome with the male genomic DNA reveals a Y chromosome that is highly differentiated from the X chromosome not only in morphology but also in DNA content. The Y chromosome of this species has therefore probably degenerated and accumulated large quantities of male specific DNA, much of which is likely to be repetitive [18, 19]. Two microsatellite motifs, (AC)15 and (AGAT)8, were mapped with intense fluorescent signals on to the Y chromosome also suggest accumulation and amplification of repetitive sequences. The lengths of the microsatellite repeats in the two microsatellite loci, APP6 and APP40, are 16 bp and 40 bp (JQ713339, JQ713352) and FISH analysis can not localize accurately such short length of DNA fragments. Therefore, our FISH mapping did not identify exact location of the two loci. However, the results clearly indicate that the two microsatellite repeats are in high copy number on the Y chromosome, and that the two microsatellite repeats, (AGAT)n and (AC)n, form the main components of the centromeric region and the long arm of the Y chromosome, respectively. It is commonly thought that suppression of recombination between the sex chromosomes favors the accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences such as retrotransposons, ribosomal DNAs and microsatellite repeats on the non-recombining regions increasing the level of differentiation between sex chromosomes . Such accumulation of repeats on sex chromosomes has been reported in many species of animals and plants (for example [21–30]), and, this process would also appear to have occurred in A. parapulchella.
The three pygopodids for which sex chromosomes have now been identified – Aprasia parapulchella, Delma inornata, and Lialis burtonis – exhibit male heterogamety. Given that these species come from three major clades within the Pygopodidae, including those representing basal lineages, it is likely that the common ancestor also had male heterogamety (Figure 4). The X chromosomes of A. parapulchella and D. inornata are morphologically similar, but their Y chromosomes differ in size and morphology. The Y chromosome in A. parapulchella is much smaller than the X chromosome, while the Y chromosome in D. inornata is submetacentric and much larger than the acrocentric X chromosome. Thus, differentiation of the Y chromosome has probably evolved independently in the Aprasia and Delma lineages. Moreover, the X1 of L. burtonis is larger than the X2 but similar in size and morphology to the X chromosomes of the other two species [13, 14]. This suggests that the X1 of L. burtonis retains the original X chromosome inherited from the common ancestor of the Pygopodidae. If so, then the X2 of L. burtonis will have evolved from one of the smaller autosomes in the common ancestor, and a chromosome fusion is likely to have occurred between that autosome and the Y chromosome in the lineage of L. burtonis (Figure 4). Further study of the chromosome homology between the X2 and the part of Y chromosome will be required to confirm or refute this proposition that such fusion has occurred. It has been suggested that the large submetacentric Y chromosome of D. inornata formed by addition of a chromosome arm , but this too requires experimental verification.
Taken together, our data build the case for an ancestral XY sex chromosome system in pygopodids. It is clear that like many other gekkonids, sex chromosomes in the pygopodids have a complex evolutionary history, with all three species examined so far differing from each other in key characteristics, such as sex chromosome sizes and morphologies. Although data are available from the limited number of species, it is likely that degeneration of Y chromosome have occurred in the common ancestor of A. parapulchella and L. burtonis and chromosome rearrangements such as fusion also played critical role in sex chromosome evolution in D. inornata and L. burtonis. Further experiments such as cross species chromosome painting using sex chromosomes, comparative mapping of sex chromosome-linked genes and repetitive sequences in several pygopodids and representative species from other gecko families are necessary to infer the sex chromosome evolution in Pygopodidae more precisely.
Tail tips cut from two male and two female Pink-tailed worm-lizards (Aprasia parapulchella) were collected from sites in the ACT for cell culture. Animal collection, handling, sampling and all other relevant procedures were performed following the guidelines of the Australian Capital Territory Animal Welfare Act 1992 (Section 40), and conducted under Permit LT2012587 (ACT Government) and CEAE 11/12 (the Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation at the University of Canberra). Two males and two females were used in the experiments.
Metaphase chromosome spreads were prepared from fibroblast cell lines of tail tissues following protocol described in Ezaz et al. . Briefly, minced tail tissues were implanted in a T25 culture flask containing AmnioMax medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and were allowed to propagate under the condition of 28°C and 5% CO2. Once the fibroblast cells had grown to about 80% confluency, they were split into T75 flasks and subsequently split up to at least four passages before the chromosomes were harvested. Colcemid (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was added to the culture flask at 75 ng/ml as the final concentration prior to harvesting. Following harvesting, cultured cells were fixed in 3:1 methanol:acetic acid and the cell suspension dropped onto glass slides, air-dried and stored at −80°C.
DNA extraction and probes synthesis
Total genomic DNA was extracted from cultured fibroblasts using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) and following the manufacturer’s protocol. The oligonucleotides labeled with Cy3 of three microsatellite motifs, (AGAT)8, (AATG)8 and (AC)15, were purchased from GeneWorks (Hindmarsh, SA, Australia).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with microsatellite motifs
FISH and CGH were conducted according to our previous study  with slight modification as follows. 500 ng of oligonucleotides of microsatellite motifs were mixed with 15 μl hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 2xSSC, 40 mmol/L sodium phosphate pH7.0 and 1x Denhardt’s solution). The hybridization mixture was placed on a chromosome slide and sealed with a coverslip and rubber cement. The probe DNA and chromosome DNA were denatured by heating the slide on a heat plate at 68.5°C for 5 min. The slides were hybridized overnight in a humid chamber at 37°C. The slides were then washed by the following series; 0.4xSSC, 0.3% IGEPAL (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) at room temperature for 2 min followed by 2xSSC, 0.1% IGEPAL at room temperature for 1 min. The slides were dehydrated by ethanol series and air-dried and then counterstained using 20 μg/ml DAPI, 2xSSC and mounted with anti-fade medium, Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA). FISH images were captured using a Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD (charge-coupled device) camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). ISIS software or AxioVision (Zeiss) was used for microphotography and analyzing images.
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
Genomic DNA was labelled by nick translation incorporating SpectrumGreen-dUTP (Abbott, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) for males and SpectrumOrange-dUTP (Abbott) for females. The labelled male and female DNA was coprecipitated with 20 μg glycogen as carrier, and dissolved in 15 μl hybridization buffer. The hybridization and washes were carried out as above with slight modification. Specifically, hybridization was carried out for 3 days and the slides were washed by 0.4xSSC, 0.3% IGEPAL at 55°C for 2 min and then 2xSSC, 0.1% IGEPAL at room temperature for 1 min.
Temperature-dependent sex determination
Comparative genomic hybridization
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Saline sodium citrate
Genotypic sex determination.
Ezaz T, Stiglec R, Veyrunes F, Graves JAM: Relationships between vertebrate ZW and XY sex chromosome systems. Curr Biol 2006, 16: R736-R743. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.021
Ezaz T, Sarre SD, O’Meally , Graves JAM, Georges A: Sex chromosome evolution in lizards: independent origins and rapid transitions. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009, 127: 249–260. 10.1159/000300507
Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre SD, Guarino F, Ezaz T, Graves JA: Temperature sex reversal implies sex gene dosage in a reptile. Science 2007, 316: 411. 10.1126/science.1135925
Radder RS, Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre SD, Shine R: Genetic evidence for co-occurrence of chromosomal and thermal sex-determining systems in a lizard. Biol Lett 2008, 4: 176–178. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0583
Sarre SD, Ezaz T, Georges A: Transitions between sex-determining systems in reptiles and amphibians. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2011, 12: 391–406. 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101518
Vidal N, Hedges SB: Lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians (Squamata). In The Timetree of Life. Edited by: Hedges SB, Kumar S. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:383–389.
Gamble T: A review of sex determining mechanisms in geckos (Gekkota: Squamata). Sex Dev 2010, 4: 88–103. 10.1159/000289578
Jennings WB, Pianka ER, Donnellan S: Systematics of the lizard family pygopodidae with implications for the diversification of Australian temperate biotas. Syst Biol 2003, 52: 757–780.
Oliver PM, Sanders KL: Molecular evidence for Gondwanan origins of multiple lineages within a diverse Australasian gecko radiation. J Biogeogr 2009, 36: 2044–2055. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02149.x
Kluge AG: A taxonomic revision of the lizard family Pygopodidae. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 1974, 147: 1–221.
Wilson S, Swan G: A complete guide to reptiles Australia. 3rd edition. Chatswood, Australia: New Holland Publisher Australia; 2010.
Olmo E, Signorino GG: Chromorep: A reptile chromosomes database. [http://chromorep.univpm.it/]
Gorman GC, Gress F: Sex chromosomes of a pygopodid lizard, Lialis burtonis . Experientia 1970, 26: 206–207. 10.1007/BF01895586
King M: Chromosomal and immunogenetic data: A new perspective on the origin of Australia’s reptiles. In Cytogenetics of Amphibians and Reptiles. Edited by: Olmo E. Basel: Birkhäuser; 1990:153–180.
Kluge AG: Phylogenetic relationships in the lizard family pygopodidae: an evaluation of theory, methods and data. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 1976, 152: 1–72.
Knopp T, Sarre SD: Identification of microsatellite markers for the pink-tailed worm-lizard, Aprasia parapulchella (kluge): an endangered pygopodid. Conservation Genetics and Resource 2012, 4: 733–735. 10.1007/s12686-012-9633-6
King M: Chromosomal evolution in the Diplodactylinae (gekkonidae: reptilia). I. Evolutionary relationships and patterns of change. Aust J Zool 1987, 35: 507–531. 10.1071/ZO9870507
Rice WR: The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 1987, 41: 911–914. 10.2307/2408899
Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D: The degeneration of Y chromosomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000, 355: 1563–1572. 10.1098/rstb.2000.0717
Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G: Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 2005, 95: 118–128. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800697
Nanda I, Feichtinger W, Schmid M, Schröder JH, Zischler H, Epplen JT: Simple repetitive sequences are associated with differentiation of the sex chromosomes in the guppy fish. J Mol Evo 1990, 30: 456–462. 10.1007/BF02101117
Kraemer C, Schmidt ER: The sex determining region of Chironomus thummi is associated with highly repetitive DNA and transposable elements. Chromosoma 1993, 102: 553–562. 10.1007/BF00368348
Erlandsson R, Wilson JF, Pääbo S: Sex chromosomal transposable element accumulation and male-driven substitutional evolution in humans. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17: 804–812. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026359
Harvey SC, Boonphakdee C, Campos-Ramos R, Ezaz MT, Griffin DK, Bromage NR Penman DJ: Analysis of repetitive DNA sequences in the sex chromosomes of Oreochromis niloticus . Cytogenet Genome Res 2003, 101: 314–319. 10.1159/000074355
Liu Z, Moore PH, Ma H, Ackerman CM, Ragiba M, Yu Q, Pearl HM, Kim MS, Charlton JW, Stiles JI, Zee FT, Paterson AH, Ming R: A primitive Y chromosome in papaya marks incipient sex chromosome evolution. Nature 2004, 427: 348–352. 10.1038/nature02228
Hobza R, Lengerova M, Svoboda J, Kubekova H, Kejnovsky E, Vyskot B: An accumulation of tandem DNA repeats on the Y chromosome in Silene latifolia during early stages of sex chromosome evolution. Chromosoma 2006, 115: 376–382. 10.1007/s00412-006-0065-5
Kawai A, Nishida-Umehara C, Ishijima J, Tsuda Y, Ota H, Matsuda Y: Different origins of bird and reptile sex chromosomes inferred from comparative mapping of chicken Z-linked genes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 117: 92–102. 10.1159/000103169
O’Meally D, Patel HR, Stiglec R, Sarre SD, Georges A, Graves JAM, Ezaz T: Non-homologous sex chromosomes of birds and snakes share repetitive sequences. Chromosome Res 2010, 18: 787–800. 10.1007/s10577-010-9152-9
Cioffi MB, Camacho JPM, Bertollo LAC: Repetitive DNAs and differentiation of sex chromosomes in neotropical fishes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011, 132: 188–194. 10.1159/000321571
Pokorná M, Kratochvíl L, Kejnovský E: Microsatellite distribution on sex chromosomes at different stages of heteromorphism and heterochromatinization in two lizard species (Squamata: Eublepharidae: Coleonyx elegans and Lacertidae: Eremias velox ). BMC Genet 2011, 12: 90. 10.1186/1471-2156-12-90
Ezaz T, O’Meally D, Quinn AE, Sarre SD, Georges A, Graves JAM: A simple non-invasive protocol to establish primary cell lines from tail and toe explants for cytogenetic studies in Australian dragon lizards (Squamata: Agamidae). Cytotechnology 2008, 58: 135–139. 10.1007/s10616-009-9182-3
Ezaz T, Quinn AE, Miura I, Sarre SD, Georges A, Graves JAM: The dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps has ZZ/ZW micro-sex chromosomes. Chromosome Res 2005, 13: 763–776. 10.1007/s10577-005-1010-9
We would like to thank David Wong for providing tail clips for cell culture. We also thank Jenny Graves for numerous discussions. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (ARC DP110102262) awarded to TE, SS, AG, Jenny Graves and Yoichi Matsuda. TE was also supported by an Australian Research Council future fellowship (FT110100733).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The authors have made the following declarations about their contributions. TE and KM conceived, designed and directed the experiments. KM performed the experiments. KM wrote the first draft and all coauthors contributed in reviewing the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.