Open Access

Analysis of chromosome 22q11 copy number variations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect

  • Jingjing Zhang1,
  • Dingyuan Ma1,
  • Yan Wang1,
  • Li Cao2,
  • Yun Wu2,
  • Fengchang Qiao1,
  • An Liu1,
  • Li Li1,
  • Ying Lin1,
  • Gang Liu1,
  • Cuiyun Liu1,
  • Ping Hu1Email author and
  • Zhengfeng Xu1Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cytogenetics20158:100

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0209-5

Received: 24 July 2015

Accepted: 18 December 2015

Published: 29 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Congenital heart defects (CHD) represent one of the most common birth defects. This study aimed to evaluate the value of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a tool to detect the copy number variations (CNVs) of 22q11 in fetuses with CHD.

Results

A large cohort of 225 fetuses with CHD was screened by fetal echocardiography. Once common chromosome abnormalities in 30 fetuses were screened out by conventional G-banding analysis, the CNVs of chromosome 22q11 in the remaining 195 fetuses were determined by MLPA for prenatal genetic counseling. In 195 CHD fetuses with normal karyotype, 11 cases had pathological CNVs, including 22q11.2 deletion (seven cases), the deletion of 22q11 cat eye syndrome (CES) region (one case), 22q11.2 duplication (one case), 22q13.3 deletion (one case) and 17p13.3 deletion (one case). In total, our findings from MLPA screening represented 4.9 % in our cohort. Among these, three cases were inherited CNVs, and eight cases were de novo. These CNVs were further verified by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array analysis, and their chromosomal location was refined.

Conclusion

This study indicated that MLPA could serve as an effective test for routine prenatal diagnosis of 22q11 in fetuses with CHD.

Keywords

Congenital heart defects22q11 deletion syndromePrenatal diagnosisMLPA

Background

Congenital heart defects (CHD) usually refer to the abnormalities in the heart’s structure or function that arise before birth [1]. It represents the most frequent birth defects and the leading cause of death from a congenital structural abnormality worldwide, causing more than 220,000 deaths globally every year [2]. In China, epidemiological studies have suggested a noticeable increase in trend of CHD mortality with the overall mortality rate increasing from 141 in 2003 to 229 in 2010 per 10,000,000 person-years [3].

The pathogenesis of CHD is largely unknown; however, current studies have indicated a multiple interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Specifically, associations between CHD and chromosomal abnormalities have been well recognized, which accounts for about 16 ~ 56 % of CHD [4]. Moreover, copy number variants (CNVs) have also been identified as a significant factor in CHD development and the most common example is the 22q11 deletion syndrome, which is estimated to affect approximately 1/4000 to 1/6000 in live births [5, 6]. In China, fetal echocardiography is performed after the second trimester ultrasound screening. It is well known that abnormal ultrasound finding is one of most common indications for amniocentesis or other invasive examination [7, 8]. Therefore, the amniocentesis or cordocentesis is suggested to diagnose chromosomal abnormalities and CNVs for fetuses with CHD.

Conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with commercial probes (TUPLE1 or N25) has been developed for the prenatal diagnosis of 22q11 chromosome deletion by many prenatal services. Mademont-soler et al. [9] compared FISH and MLPA techniques for detection of 22q11 chromosome deletion. The results showed that the use of MLPA had not increased the number of diagnosis of 22q11 deletion, and the author suggested that MLPA should not replace FISH as a conventional technology for prenatal diagnosis of 22q11 chromosome deletion. However, many reports have pointed out the advantage of MLPA in the postnatal study [1012]. To date, there is little data about using MLPA in a large cohort prenatal study. In our report, we present a large cohort of 225 CHD fetuses to evaluate the application value of MLPA in prenatal detection of CNVs in 22q11.

Results

Conventional G-banding analysis detected all 225 fetuses, and then MLPA screening was performed in the remaining fetuses with normal karyotype. In total, chromosomal abnormalities represented 30 cases (13.3 %) in our cohort (Table 1), including 11 fetuses with trisomy 18, 14 fetuses with trisomy 21, one fetus with 45, XO, two fetuses with chromosomal polyploidy, one fetus with 46, XY, add(1) (p36) and one fetus with balanced translocation (46, XY, t(1;2) (p32;q35)) respectively. Of 30 cases with chromosomal abnormalities, 19 cases had isolated CHD and 11 cases had multiple congenital anomalies.
Table 1

Summary of aneuploidy and CNVs detected from 225 fetuses with CHD

Types of CHD

Number of fetuses

Number of fetuses with aneuploidy

 

Number of fetuses with CNVs

Total

22q11.2 deletion

The deletion of 22q CES region

22q11.2 duplication

22q13.3 deletion

17p13.3 deletion

Conotruncal defect

85

8

6

1

1

1

1

18

Septal defect

104

17

1

0

0

0

0

18

Left-heart defect

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Right-heart defect

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other heart defect

28

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

Total

225

30 (13.3 %)

7 (3.1 %)

1 (0.4 %)

1 (0.4 %)

1 (0.4 %)

1 (0.4 %)

41 (17.8 %)

CHD congenital heart defects, CNVs copy number variants, CES cat eye syndrome

For remaining 195 CHD fetuses with normal karyotype, MLPA analysis revealed that 11 cases had CNVs (Table 1). All the 11 cases had isolated CHD, including ten conotruncal defects and one septal defect (Table 1). Fetuses 1–6 showed typical 22q11.2 deletions located from LCR-A to LCR-D regions, fetus seven showed 22q11.2 deletions located from LCR-A to LCR-B regions, and fetus eight showed the deletion based on the 22q11 cat eye syndrome region while Fetus 9–11 showed 22q11.2 duplication, 22q13.3 deletion, and 17p13.3 deletion, respectively (Fig. 1) (Table 2). Succedent SNP-array analysis verified all of the positive results from MLPA and the concordance rate is 100 % (Table 2). For fetus 8, SNP-array analysis revealed a 980 kb heterozygous deletion mapping to position 17,067,005-18,047,231 on chromosome 22q11 (Fig. 2). Further study indicated that each CNV of fetuses 7–9 were inherited from one’s asymptomatic mother or father, while the others were de novo.
Fig. 1

MLPA analysis of chromosome 22q11 in fetuses 1–11. Probe names are shown on the x-axis. Their chromosomal location is displayed in the upper panel. Columns corresponding to normalized electropherogram peak areas were calculated using Coffalyser software. a. Typical 22q11.2 deletions located from LCR-A to LCR-D regions in fetus 1–6. b. 22q11.2 deletions located from LCR-A to LCR-B regions in fetus 7. c. The deletion located in the 22q11 cat-eye-syndrome region in fetus 8. d. 22q11.2 duplication in fetus 9. e. 22q13.3 deletion in fetus 10. f. 17p13.3 deletion in fetus 11

Table 2

MLPA and SNP-array results of 11 fetuses with CHD

Case

Age

Weeks of gestation

Cardiac ultrasound findings

MLPA results

SNP-array results

Type of mutation

Band

State

Probes

Positon

Size

1

29

25

IAA,VSD

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18877787 ~ 21798907

2.92 M

de novo

2

24

24

TGA, VSD

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18877787 ~ 21462353

2.58 M

de novo

3

37

25

TA,VSD

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18877787 ~ 21462353

2.58 M

de novo

4

23

27

TA,VSD

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18895227 ~ 21462353

2.56 M

de novo

5

29

24

TOF

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18877787 ~ 21462353

2.58 M

de novo

6

29

23

VSD

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18895227 ~ 21462353

2.56 M

de novo

7

28

23

TOF, PA

22q11.2

Del.

CLTCL1 ~ DGCR8

18895227 ~ 20306993

1.4 M

inherited

8

26

23

DORV, VSD, PA

22q11.122q11.2

Del

IL17RA,SLC25A18

17067005 ~ 18047231

980 k

inherited

9

31

24

AH,VSD

22q11.2

Dup.

CLTCL1 ~ LZTR1

18623108 ~ 21462353

2.8 M

inherited

10

29

24

IAA,VSD, ASD

22q13.3

Del.

ARSA, SHANK3

49045728 ~ 51169045

2.1 M

de novo

11

26

22

DORV, VSD, PA

17p13.3

Del.

RH3AL,GEMIN4, YWHAE

18901 ~ 2633324

2.61 M

de novo

VSD ventricular septal defect, IAA interrupted aortic arch, TGA transposition of conducting arteries, TA truncus arteriosus, TOF trilogy of fallot, PA pulmonary atresia, AH aortic hypoplasia, ASD atrial septum defect, DORV double outlet right ventricle

Fig. 2

SNP-array analysis of chromosome 22q11 in fetus 8. The analysis revealed a 980 kb heterozygous deletion mapping to position 17,067,005-18,047,231 on chromosome 22q11. Some known genes within the region are indicated in the down panel

Discussion

In this study, a large cohort of 225 fetuses with CHD was detected by traditional karyotyping and MLPA to identify the chromosome abnormality and CNVs on chromosome 22q11. The results demonstrated 30 fetuses (13.3 %) had a chromosomal abnormality, and 11 fetuses (4.9 %) had CNVs. All positive findings from MLPA were in agreement with those from SNP-array.

Our study used the MLPA P250 DiGeorge kit to identify the CNVs on different chromosomes and found that 3.1 % of CHD cases (7/225) had deletions on 22q11 (Table 1). Several studies have also reported the frequency of 22q11 CNVs in CHD fetuses and the data ranged from 1.6 ~ 11.5 % [4, 13]. Our data was similar to that reported by Moore et al. [14] (17/540, 3.1 %). Of the seven cases with 22q11 deletions, six cases had conotruncal defects. Our results showed high detection rate of 22q11 CNVs in cases with a conotruncal defect (7.1 %, 6/85), which was close to the findings by Galindo et al. [15] (8.7 %) and Bretelle et al. [16] (4.7 %). All these results indicated that the conotruncal defect was mostly associated with 22q11 CNVs [15].

In addition to 22q11, MLPA P250 DiGeorge kit also contains the probes targeting other regions including 22q13, 10p14, 8p23, 9q34, 17p13.3 and 4q34. Thus, we also found the deletions in both 22q13.3 and 17p13.3 (Table 2). The 22q13.3 deletion syndrome was also defined as a Phelan-McDermid syndrome and mainly manifested as global developmental delay, hypotonia, delayed or absent speech, and autistic behavior [17, 18]. Only one study [19] reported one CHD fetus with 22q13.3 deletion by prenatal diagnosis, supporting the findings of our study. The 17p13.3 deletion syndrome is also known as Miller-Dieker Lissencephaly Syndrome. The syndrome is characterized by nervous system anomalies, facial abnormalities, IUGR, mental retardation and other malformation including cardiac defects. To date, at least 29 prenatal cases with the 17p13.3 deletion syndrome have been reported. Among them, only four cases presented with CHD [20]. In our study, the case 11 with 17p13.3 deletion showed cardiac defects including DORV, VSD and PA. These results suggested that MLPA technology could comprehensively and rapidly detect pathogenic CNVs in several different chromosomes regions.

Previous studies found that about 6 ~ 28 % of prenatal 22q11 deletions were inherited from one parent [21]. Two cases with pathological CNVs were inherited from one parent in our study (Table 1). The SNP-array analysis indicated that the position of the fetus was identical with that of the parent. One case in this study had 22q11 duplication inherited from his father (Table 2). Though 22q11 CNVs were present in the three parents, they did not display any mental disorder based on physical examination. Furthermore, their internal organs especially heart revealed no abnormalities by sonographic examination. Several reasons may explain the difference in phenotypes with the same genetic changes, such as allelic variation at the haploid locus, self-repair and environmental effects [22, 23]. Since healthy carriers of chromosomal deletions or duplications have 50 % chance to pass on to the next generation in each pregnancy, two couples who had the fetus with pathogenic CNVs in our study may have a high risk in their next pregnancy. Among the three families, the mother of case seven had a normal child with no CNVs, the mother of case nine had a miscarriage and the mother of case eight had not been pregnant again.

The proximal portion of chromosome 22q was a hot region for chromosomal rearrangement. Cat eye syndrome (CES) is a rare chromosome disorder in human caused by the duplication of chromosome 22q11. The CES critical region covered approximately 2 Mb from the centromere to the locus D22S57 [24], but the deletion of this region is rarely reported. According to DECIPHER database (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk), only eight cases were detected to carry genomic deletion encompassing the region, and none of them displayed CHD. Kriek et al. [25] firstly reported that a fetus, carrying different rearrangements on chromosome 22q, including the deletion of CES critical region, had the manifestation of developmental delay but no history of cardiac problems. Kriek et al. also suggested that the deletion of CES critical region had little clinical relevance because the normal familial members were carrying this deletion. In our study, we firstly report a fetus with CHD showing a deletion of 980 K spanning the CES region from genomic position 17,067,005 to18,047,231 (Fig. 2). This deletion region contained 14 genes, including six OMIM genes (CECR7, CECR2, CECR1, IL17RA, XKR3, and SLC25A18). Xie et al. [26] identified that IL17RA was related to myocardial disease while there were no other genes having been reported to be related to cardiac disease. Besides the duplication of CES region can cause the manifestation of CHD, our finding firstly indicated a possible relationship between CHD and the deletion of CES region. Further collecting of more cases is still needed to confirm if the deletion of CES region may cause CHD.

Conclusion

In summary, this study confirmed that MLPA could rapidly and efficiently detect pathogenic CNVs associated with CHD in our cohort. Thus, it is an economical, fast and accurate method for the prenatal genetic diagnosis of CHD for clinical application.

Methods

Case recruitment

The study was performed at the Department of Prenatal Diagnosis in Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Jiangsu, China) between 2011 and 2014. In our hospital, the second trimester ultrasound screening was carried out in all pregnancies. After structural heart defects were found, prenatal echocardiography was offered for detail diagnosis. In total, 225 fetuses presenting with CHD were enrolled in the study. The distribution of different clinical manifestations was shown in Table 1. The CHD cases included in the study were: conotruncal defects (85/225), septal defects (104/225), left-heart defects (7/225), right-heart defect (1/225), and other heart defects (28/225). In all 225 fetuses, 211 cases were with isolated CHD, and the other 14 cases were with extra cardiac anomalies. G-banding analysis was first carried out in all 225 fetuses. Once chromosome abnormalities had been excluded in a fetus with a CHD, the CNV of chromosome 22q11 were investigated by MLPA. The mean age of these pregnancies was 29 ± 4.33 years old and the average gestation age at invasive prenatal diagnosis was 24 ± 2.56 weeks. All the pregnant women signed the informed consent form. This study was approved by the medicine ethics committee of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital.

Cytogenetic analysis

All samples of amniotic fluid and fetal cord blood were detected using G-banding according to the standard procedure described previously [27].

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Fetal DNA was extracted from uncultured amniotic fluid or fetal blood cells according to the illustrations of the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The SALSA MLPA P250 kit was performed to detect deletion or duplication of the 22q11 chromosomal region. This kit includes 24 probes targeting DiGeorge syndrome region, five probes targeting cat eye syndrome region, and 19 probes for DiGeorge anomaly related chromosomal regions such as 22q13, 10p14, 8p23, 9q34, 17p13.3, and 4q34.

About 100 ~ 150 ng DNA of each sample was involved in the experiment. MLPA analysis was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. The MLPA products were examined by ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher, USA) and quantitative data were analyzed using the software of Coffalyser V8.0 (http://www.mlpa.com/coffalyser). The 30 % increase or decrease of the relative peak area of the probe showed the duplication or deletion of the targeted region, respectively.

SNP-array analysis

Fetus DNA was examined by Human cyto12 SNP-array scanning (Illumina, USA), which comprised about 300,000 SNPs across the whole genome. SNP-array experiments were carried out as previously described [28] and molecular karyotype analysis was performed by KaryoStudio Software V 1.3.11 (Illumina, USA).

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the pregnant women for publication of this paper. This research was approved by the ethics committee of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital.

Notes

Abbreviations

CHD: 

congenital heart defects

CNV: 

copy number variation

MLPA: 

multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

CES: 

cat eye syndrome

SNP: 

single nucleotide polymorphism

FISH: 

fluorescence in situ hybridization

VSD: 

ventricular septal defect

IAA: 

interrupted aortic arch

TGA: 

transposition of conducting arteries

TA: 

truncus arteriosus

TOF: 

trilogy of fallot

PA: 

pulmonary atresia

AH: 

aortic hypoplasia

ASD: 

atrial septum defect

DORV: 

double outlet right ventricle

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the members of the family for their participation. The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81300495), the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK20141076), the Medical Leading Talent and Innovation Team Project of Jiangsu Province (No. LJ201109), the Key Technology R&D Program of Jiangsu Province (No. BL2012039), and the Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Health (H201343, F201216).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Prenatal Diagnosis, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
(2)
Department of Ultrasound, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University

References

  1. Bruneau BG. The developmental genetics of congenital heart disease. Nature. 2008;451:943–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hu Z, Yuan X, Rao K, Zheng Z, Hu S. National trend in congenital heart disease mortality in China during 2003 to 2010: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:596–602. e591.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellucco FT, Belangero SI, Farah LM, Machado MV, Cruz AP, Lopes LM, et al. Investigating 22q11.2 deletion and other chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with heart defects detected by prenatal echocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31:1146–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Scambler PJ. The 22q11 deletion syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2421–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. McDermid HE, Morrow BE. Genomic disorders on 22q11. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:1077–88.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang YW, Chang CM, Sung PL, Yang MJ, Li WH, Li HY, et al. An overview of a 30-year experience with amniocentesis in a single tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;51:206–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE, Ozeren M, Avci ME, Uyar I, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 6,142 amniocentesis cases: A 6-year single centre experience. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34:571–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mademont-Soler I, Morales C, Soler A, Clusellas N, Margarit E, Martinez-Barrios E, et al. MLPA: a prenatal diagnostic tool for the study of congenital heart defects? Gene. 2012;500:151–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber J, Peres VC, de Castro AL, dos Santos TJ, da Fontoura BL, de Baumont AC, et al. Molecular screening for 22Q11.2 deletion syndrome in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35:1356–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, Vossebeld-Hoff I, Jansen R, van der Luijt RB, et al. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:1032–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jalali GR, Vorstman JA, Errami A, Vijzelaar R, Biegel J, Shaikh T, et al. Detailed analysis of 22q11.2 with a high density MLPA probe set. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:433–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Agergaard P, Olesen C, Ostergaard JR, Christiansen M, Sorensen KM. The prevalence of chromosome 22q11.2 deletions in 2,478 children with cardiovascular malformations. A population-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:498–508.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore JW, Binder GA, Berry R. Prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy and deletion 22q11.2 in fetuses with ultrasound detection of cardiac defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:2068–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Galindo A, Mendoza A, Arbues J, Graneras A, Escribano D, Nieto O. Conotruncal anomalies in fetal life: accuracy of diagnosis, associated defects and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:55–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bretelle F, Beyer L, Pellissier MC, Missirian C, Sigaudy S, Gamerre M, et al. Prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2010;53:367–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Phelan MC. Deletion 22q13.3 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Beri S, De Agostini C, Novara F, Fichera M, et al. Molecular mechanisms generating and stabilizing terminal 22q13 deletions in 44 subjects with Phelan/McDermid syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002173.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Maitz S, Gentilin B, Colli AM, Rizzuti T, Brandolisio E, Vetro A, et al. Expanding the phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion: report of a case detected prenatally. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:978–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen CP, Chang TY, Guo WY, Wu PC, Wang LK, Chern SR, et al. Chromosome 17p13.3 deletion syndrome: aCGH characterization, prenatal findings and diagnosis, and literature review. Gene. 2013;532:152–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Digilio MC, Angioni A, De Santis M, Lombardo A, Giannotti A, Dallapiccola B, et al. Spectrum of clinical variability in familial deletion 22q11.2: from full manifestation to extremely mild clinical anomalies. Clin Genet. 2003;63:308–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Vogt P. Potential genetic functions of tandem repeated DNA sequence blocks in the human genome are based on a highly conserved “chromatin folding code”. Hum Genet. 1990;84:301–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindsay EA, Baldini A. Recovery from arterial growth delay reduces penetrance of cardiovascular defects in mice deleted for the DiGeorge syndrome region. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:997–1002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. McTaggart KE, Budarf ML, Driscoll DA, Emanuel BS, Ferreira P, McDermid HE. Cat eye syndrome chromosome breakpoint clustering: identification of two intervals also associated with 22q11 deletion syndrome breakpoints. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;81:222–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kriek M, Szuhai K, Kant SG, White SJ, Dauwerse H, Fiegler H, et al. A complex rearrangement on chromosome 22 affecting both homologues; haplo-insufficiency of the Cat eye syndrome region may have no clinical relevance. Hum Genet. 2006;120:77–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Xie Y, Li M, Wang X, Zhang X, Peng T, Yang Y, et al. In vivo delivery of adenoviral vector containing interleukin-17 receptor a reduces cardiac remodeling and improves myocardial function in viral myocarditis leading to dilated cardiomyopathy. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72158.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Steele MW, Breg Jr WR. Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet. 1966;1:383–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Halder A, Jain M, Chaudhary I, Varma B. Chromosome 22q11.2 microdeletion in monozygotic twins with discordant phenotype and deletion size. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5:13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al. 2015

Advertisement