Open Access

Intragenic deletion of RBFOX1 associated with neurodevelopmental/neuropsychiatric disorders and possibly other clinical presentations

Molecular Cytogenetics20136:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-26

Received: 11 April 2013

Accepted: 30 May 2013

Published: 3 July 2013

Abstract

Background

RBFOX1 is an important splicing factor regulating developmental and tissue-specific alternative splicing in heart, muscle, and neuronal tissues. Constitutional genetic defects in RBFOX1 are implicated in multiple medical conditions.

Results

We identified 14 copy number variants (CNV) involving RBFOX1 from 2,124 consecutive pediatric patients referred for chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), including 13 intragenic deletions and a single intragenic duplication. The clinical significances of the intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 were evaluated.

Conclusions

Our data strongly supports the associations of intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 with a diversity of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, and possibly other clinical features.

Keywords

Microdeletion Chromosome 16p13.3 RBFOX1 Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) Seizures Developmental delay

Background

RBFOX1 [RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans)], located at human chromosome 16p13.3, is one of the three member in Fox gene family encoding splicing factors [1, 2]. It is specifically expressed in heart, muscle and neuronal tissues, regulating developmental and tissue-specific alternative splicing by binding with (U)GCAUG sequence in introns flanking alternative exons of its target genes [1, 36]. RBFOX1 was initially identified as a binding partner of the brain-specific protein ATXN2, causing spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2) when the CAG repeats in this gene are expanded. Since then, constitutional genetic defects in RBFOX1 are implicated in multiple medical conditions including mental retardation and epilepsy [7], bipolar schizoaffective disorder [8], attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [9], autism [1013], hand osteoarthritis [14], congenital heart defects [15], obesity and diabetes [16, 17], Intracranial arachnoid cysts [18], and primary biliary cirrhosis [19].

Results and discussion

In this report, we evaluated the clinical significances of the intragenic deletions/duplication of RBFOX1 in 12 out of 14 patients who carry the genomic imbalances. Fourteen copy number variants (CNV) involving RBFOX1, including 13 intragenic deletions and a single intragenic duplication, were identified in this cohort (Figure 1; Table 1), representing ~0.66% (14/2,124) of the patients analyzed in this study. There are no other clinically relevant CNVs in their genomes except in Patient 6 who carries an additional 178 kb deletion of 1p31.3 involving NF1A besides the intragenic deletion of RBFOX. Of the 13 deletions, 4 of them (in patients 1, 3, 5, and 6) involve exons while the remaining deletions involve only introns. The intragenic duplication in Patient 6 involves exons 4 and 5 of RBFOX1. The deletions/duplications were confirmed by qPCR methods (data not shown). The deletion in Patient 5 was maternally inherited while both deletions in Patient 6 occurred de novo. The inheritance patterns of the deletions/duplication could not be determined in remaining patients due to unavailability of DNA samples from either one parent in Patient 8 or both parents in other patients. By comparing breakpoints of the 14 intragenic deletions/duplication within the group and with the CNVs involving RBFOX1 documented in the DGV (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/), multiple hot spots involving the generation of CNVs within RBFOX1 were observed, such as the proximal breakpoints of the CNVs in Patients 7, 8, and 11, and both proximal and distal breakpoints of the CNVs in Patients 9 and 10 (Figure 1; Table 1). In addition, G-banding analysis showed negative results for all 14 patients while a pathogenic mutation in ZEB2 and a pathogenic mutation in F8 were identified in Patient 1 and Patient 9 respectively.
Figure 1

Genomic overview of the intragenic deletions (patients 1–13) and duplication of RBFOX1 (patient 14) in this study.

Table 1

CNVs involving RBFOX1 gene on chromosome 16

Case

Start* (bp)

Stop*(bp)

Size (bp)

Del/Dup

Affected exon(s)

Inheritance and comments

1

6,296,453

6,317,524

21,071

Del

2

NT, a diagnosis of Mowat-Wilson syndrome

2

6,398,588

6,417,167

18,579

Del

-

NT

3

6,500,668

6,737,047

236,379

Del

3

Inconclusive

4

6,567,938

6,609,613

41,675

Del

-

NT

5

6,597,626

6,759,803

162,177

Del

3

Maternally inherited

6

6,752,063

7,577,445

825,382

Del

4 to 9

An additional 178 kb deletion of 1p31.3 (61,318,736-61,496,706); De novo for both deletions

7

6,781,978

6,948,525

166,547

Del

-

NT

8

6,829,209

6,904,158

74,949

Del

-

NT

9

6,860,713

7,018,893

158,180

Del

-

NT, a diagnosis of mild hemophilia A

10

6,866,819

7,011,349

144,530

Del

-

NT

11

6,883,111

6,912,449

29,338

Del

-

NT

12

7,079,544

7,133,209

53,665

Del

-

NT

13

7,132,809

7,170,657

37,848

Del

-

NT

14

6,689,120

7,062,757

373,637

Dup

4, 5

NT

Notes: *The genomic coordinates of these CNVs were based on the human genome annotation of hg18 build; Del deletion, Dup duplication, NT not tested.

Of the 14 patients containing intragenic deletions/duplication of RBFOX1 (Tables 1 and 2), two of them were excluded for further analysis of the genotype-phenotype correlations, including Patient 1 who was diagnosed with Mowat-Wilson syndrome both phenotypically and genotypically, and Patient 14, the single case with an intragenic duplication of RBFOX1 accompanied with multiple congenital anomalies. Although both Patients 6 and 9 contain additional genomic abnormalities in addition to the intragenic deletions of RBFOX1, these two cases were included for further analysis since the clinical significance of the 178 kb deletion of 1p31.3 (61,318,736-61,496,706) involving NFIA in Patient 6 has not been defined yet and the mild hemophilia A in Patient 9 is assumed not to interfere the phenotypic effects of the RBFOX1 deletion. Recurrent features in the 12 patients (Patients 2 to 13) with intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 include global developmental delay (GDD) (7/12), epilepsy (6/12), macrocephaly or microcephaly (6/12), renal problems (4/12), such as single kidney, renal insufficiency, hypospadias, voiding dysfunction and nocturnal enuresis, bone and muscle problems (4/12), such as hemivertebrae, kyphosis, equinovarus, contractures of knees and hips, hypotonia (2/12), and hearing impairment (2/12). Some isolated findings were also observed, including autism, paralyzed vocal cords, tracheomalacia, gastroesophageal reflux, complex congenital heart defect, short stature, type II diabetes, adenoid hypertrophy, hypothyroidism, lactic acidosis, and hypernatremia (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical findings in patients with intragenic deletions/duplication in this study

Cases

Sex

Dysmorphism

Neurological problems

GDD/Autism/speech delay

Other organ abnormalities/disorders

1

F

None

None

GDD

Hypotonia, feeding problems, eczema, bilateral renal reflux and dilatation, episodes of fussiness and gassiness, chronic constipation, a diagnosis of Mowat-Wilson syndrome

2

M

Macrocephaly

None

GDD, Autism

Hypothyroid at birth, history of lactic acidosis

3

M

None

Epilepsy

None

Gastroesophageal reflux, voiding dysfunction and nocturnal enuresis, and adenoid hypertrophy

4

M

Severe microcephaly

Perinatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy with resultant severe cystic encephalomalacia, focal epilepsy, cerebral palsy, asymmetric spasticity

GDD, especially speech delay

None

5

F

None

None

None

Bicuspid aortic valve with aortic dilation, anomalous superior left pulmonary venous return

6

M

Macrocephaly

None

Severe GDD

Hypotonia, kyphosis

7

M

None

Encephalopathy

Alexia, dyslexia

Short stature

8

M

None

Epilepsy

Mild developmental delay, speech delay

Hypospadias

9

M

Macrocephaly

Poorly developed corpus callosum

Severe GDD

Hearing impairment, hypernatremia and renal insufficiency, a diagnosis of mild hemophilia A

10

F

None

None

None

Hypotonia, tracheal malasia,

11

F

Plagiocephaly and infantile torticolli

Epilepsy, abnormal EEG with a slow background and temporal spikes, and staring spells

GDD, especially speech delay

Hearing impairment

12

F

None

Epilepsy

Intellectual disability, aggressive behavior

None

13

M

Severe microcephaly and micrognathia

Epilepsy, ventriculomegaly

None

Paralyzed vocal cords, bilateral equinovarus, contractures of knees and hips bilaterally

14*

M

None

None

NA

Atrioventricular canal, transposition of the great arteries, pulmonary valve atresia, supraventricular tachycardia, and congenital absence of spleen

Notes: *-newborn; M male, F female, GDD global developmental delay, EEG electroencephalogram, NA not applicable.

We believe the intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 identified in these patients are risk factors for a wide spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders and other clinical features. 1. Comparing with healthy groups, the 0.61% (13/2,124) detection rate of intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 in our study is significantly higher than the rate observed in control populations, such as the 0.1% (2/1854) in Itsara’s report [20] and the 0.2% (4/2026) in Shaikh’s report [21]. 2. Genetic defects including point mutations or intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 were independently reported to be associated with a variety of clinical conditions [7, 911, 1419]. Majority of the clinical findings in the 12 patients in our cohort, such as GDD, seizures, and other neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, are consistent with those reported cases who carried genetic defects in RBFOX1[711, 22]. For example, a recent study identified exonic deletions of the RBFOX1 gene in 5 of the 1,408 European patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), but in none of the 2,256 population controls [22]. Davis LK et al. presented a inherited RBFOX1 exon-2 deletion in a boy with autism and developmental hemiparesis [23]. Bone and muscle problems present in multiple cases in this study were also observed in a report [14]. 3. The intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 in patient 6 occurred de novo, providing additional support about its pathological relevance to severe GDD, macrocephaly, hypotonia, and kyphosis in this patient. 4. More importantly, functional studies on RBFOX1 strongly support the etiological roles of RBFOX1 for neurodevelopmental disorders [10, 24, 25]. For example, almost identical to the knockout mice (Rbfox1-/-) with central nervous system (CNS)-specific deletion of Rbfox1, mice with heterozygous deletion (Rbfox1+/-) showed a dramatically increased susceptibility to induced seizures [24]. The loss of Rbfox1 was found to cause an increase in excitability of the neuronal population of the dentate gyrus resulting from an altered synaptic function. Martin et al. reported a 160 kb cryptic deletion of RBFOX1 within the breakpoint involved in a translocation between the short arms of chromosomes 15 and 16 in a female with autism, epilepsy, and GDD [10]. Accompanied with this heterozygous deletion, reduced mRNA expression in the individual’s lymphocytes was showed, demonstrating the functional consequence of the RBFOX1 deletion in multiple tissues. In a mouse model of Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), Pistoni et al. recently showed that reducing Rbfox1 expression inhibits muscle differentiation [25].

There are several weaknesses in this study. 1. Ascertainment bias exists in our cohort since many of the patients were referred for CMA analysis because of unexplained neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric presentations. 2. Intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 were observed in some individuals with apparently normal phenotypes although incomplete penetrance of RBFOX1 defects exist [20, 21] (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/). 3. Most of the intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 in our patients affected only introns or the noncoding exons although point mutations or intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 were considered pathogenic in majority of the previous studies [7, 911, 1419]. 4. The inheritance pattern(s) of the intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 in this study could not be determined in majority of them due to unavailability of parental samples and Patient 5 who inherited the deletion from her mother, the only determined inheritance of the deletion in this study, showed a different phenotype compared with her mother [15] although variable expressivity might exist.

In conclusion, the current study strongly supports the associations of intragenic deletions of RBFOX1 with a diversity of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, and possibly other clinical features. Our data expend the spectrums of both the genomic abnormalities of RBFOX1 and phenotypic presentations associated with mutated RBFOX.

Material and methods

The DNA samples used for the current study came from 2,124 consecutive pediatric patients referred for chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in our laboratory. Each child had one or more of the following clinical findings at the time of referral: intellectual disability, developmental delay, multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), dysmorphism, seizures, learning disabilities or speech delays. Informed consents of all patients analyzed in this study were obtained from the parents and the institutional review board of KingMed Genome Diagnostic Laboratory approved this study protocol. The CMA platform used in this study is the Agilent Human Genome Microarray Kit 244K which contains about 244,000 probes across human genome including 186 probes encompassing RBFOX1 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). All CMA tests were performed and analyzed following protocols described previously [26]. The genomic coordinates of these CNVs in this study were based on the human genome annotation of hg18 build. For confirmation of the abnormal CMA results, quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) methods were performed using three different sets of primers targeting to the deleted regions of RBFOX1 as described previously [27]. The qPCR method was also applied to test the 5 available parental samples (2 couples and 1 single parent) for determination of the inheritance pattern of the genomic abnormalities in their respective children (Table 1). In addition, all the 14 individuals were previously tested by standard chromosome analysis (G-banding) with negative results and some of them were evaluated by specific genetic tests.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Pathology, KingMed Genome Diagnostic Laboratory

References

  1. Auweter SD, Fasan R, Reymond L, Underwood JG, Black DL, Pitsch S, Allain FH: Molecular basis of RNA recognition by the human alternative splicing factor Fox-1. EMBO J 2006, 25(1):163–173. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600918PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kiehl TR, Shibata H, Pulst SM: The ortholog of human ataxin-2 is essential for early embryonic patterning in C. elegans. J Mol Neurosci 2000, 15(3):231–241. 10.1385/JMN:15:3:231View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jin Y, Suzuki H, Maegawa S, Endo H, Sugano S, Hashimoto K, Yasuda K, Inoue K: A vertebrate RNA-binding protein Fox-1 regulates tissue-specific splicing via the pentanucleotide GCAUG. EMBO J 2003, 22(4):905–912. 10.1093/emboj/cdg089PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Underwood JG, Boutz PL, Dougherty JD, Stoilov P, Black DL: Homologues of the Caenorhabditis elegans Fox-1 protein are neuronal splicing regulators in mammals. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25(22):10005–10016. 10.1128/MCB.25.22.10005-10016.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakahata S, Kawamoto S: Tissue-dependent isoforms of mammalian Fox-1 homologs are associated with tissue-specific splicing activities. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(7):2078–2089. 10.1093/nar/gki338PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiehl TR, Shibata H, Vo T, Huynh DP, Pulst SM: Identification and expression of a mouse ortholog of A2BP1. Mamm Genome 2001, 12(8):595–601. 10.1007/s00335-001-2056-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhalla K, Phillips HA, Crawford J, McKenzie OL, Mulley JC, Eyre H, Gardner AE, Kremmidiotis G, Callen DF: The de novo chromosome 16 translocations of two patients with abnormal phenotypes (mental retardation and epilepsy) disrupt the A2BP1 gene. J Hum Genet 2004, 49(6):308–311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamshere ML, Green EK, Jones IR, Jones L, Moskvina V, Kirov G, Grozeva D, Nikolov I, Vukcevic D, Caesar S, et al.: Genetic utility of broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective disorder as a diagnostic concept. Br J Psychiatry 2009, 195(1):23–29. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061424PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elia J, Gai X, Xie HM, Perin JC, Geiger E, Glessner JT, D'Arcy M, de Berardinis R, Frackelton E, Kim C, et al.: Rare structural variants found in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder are preferentially associated with neurodevelopmental genes. Mol Psychiatry 2009, 15(6):637–646.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin CL, Duvall JA, Ilkin Y, Simon JS, Arreaza MG, Wilkes K, Alvarez-Retuerto A, Whichello A, Powell CM, Rao K, et al.: Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of A2BP1/FOX1 as a candidate gene for autism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2007, 144B(7):869–876. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30530View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Voineagu I, Wang X, Johnston P, Lowe JK, Tian Y, Horvath S, Mill J, Cantor RM, Blencowe BJ, Geschwind DH: Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature 2011, 474(7351):380–384. 10.1038/nature10110PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnby G, Abbott A, Sykes N, Morris A, Weeks DE, Mott R, Lamb J, Bailey AJ, Monaco AP: Candidate-gene screening and association analysis at the autism-susceptibility locus on chromosome 16p: evidence of association at GRIN2A and ABAT. Am J Hum Genet 2005, 76(6):950–966. 10.1086/430454PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Malhotra D, Troge J, Lese-Martin C, Walsh T, Yamrom B, Yoon S, Krasnitz A, Kendall J, et al.: Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 2007, 316(5823):445–449. 10.1126/science.1138659PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhai G, van Meurs JB, Livshits G, Meulenbelt I, Valdes AM, Soranzo N, Hart D, Zhang F, Kato BS, Richards JB, et al.: A genome-wide association study suggests that a locus within the ataxin 2 binding protein 1 gene is associated with hand osteoarthritis: the Treat-OA consortium. J Med Genet 2009, 46(9):614–616. 10.1136/jmg.2009.067314PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lale S, Yu S, Ahmed A: Complex Congenital Heart Defects in Association with Maternal Diabetes and Partial Deletion of the A2BP1 Gene. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2011, 30(3):161–166. 10.3109/15513815.2010.547555View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma L, Hanson RL, Traurig MT, Muller YL, Kaur BP, Perez JM, Meyre D, Fu M, Korner A, Franks PW, et al.: Evaluation of A2BP1 as an obesity gene. Diabetes 2010, 59(11):2837–2845. 10.2337/db09-1604PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehtinen AB, Cox AJ, Ziegler JT, Voruganti VS, Xu J, Freedman BI, Carr JJ, Comuzzie AG, Langefeld CD, Bowden DW: Genetic mapping of vascular calcified plaque loci on chromosome 16p in European Americans from the diabetes heart study. Ann Hum Genet 2011, 75(2):222–235. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00632.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Aarhus M, Helland CA, Lund-Johansen M, Wester K, Knappskog PM: Microarray-based gene expression profiling and DNA copy number variation analysis of temporal fossa arachnoid cysts. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010, 7: 6. 10.1186/1743-8454-7-6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshita S, Umemura T, Yoshizawa K, Katsuyama Y, Tanaka E, Ota M: A2BP1 as a novel susceptible gene for primary biliary cirrhosis in Japanese patients. Hum Immunol 2010, 71(5):520–524. 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.02.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Itsara A, Cooper GM, Baker C, Girirajan S, Li J, Absher D, Krauss RM, Myers RM, Ridker PM, Chasman DI, et al.: Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 2009, 84(2):148–161. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.014PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaikh TH, Gai X, Perin JC, Glessner JT, Xie H, Murphy K, O'Hara R, Casalunovo T, Conlin LK, D'Arcy M, et al.: High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: a data resource for clinical and research applications. Genome Res 2009, 19(9):1682–1690. 10.1101/gr.083501.108PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lal D, Trucks H, Moller RS, Hjalgrim H, Koeleman BP, de Kovel CG, Visscher F, Weber YG, Lerche H, Becker F, et al.: Rare exonic deletions of the RBFOX1 gene increase risk of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013, 54(2):265–271. 10.1111/epi.12084View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis LK, Maltman N, Mosconi MW, Macmillan C, Schmitt L, Moore K, Francis SM, Jacob S, Sweeney JA, Cook EH: Rare inherited A2BP1 deletion in a proband with autism and developmental hemiparesis. Am J Med Genet A 2012, 158A(7):1654–1661. 10.1002/ajmg.a.35396View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gehman LT, Stoilov P, Maguire J, Damianov A, Lin CH, Shiue L, Ares M Jr, Mody I, Black DL: The splicing regulator Rbfox1 (A2BP1) controls neuronal excitation in the mammalian brain. Nat Genet 2011, 43(7):706–711. 10.1038/ng.841PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pistoni M, Shiue L, Cline MS, Bortolanza S, Neguembor MV, Xynos A, Ares M Jr, Gabellini D: Rbfox1 downregulation and altered calpain 3 splicing by FRG1 in a mouse model of Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). PLoS Genet 2013, 9(1):e1003186. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003186PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu S, Bittel DC, Kibiryeva N, Zwick DL, Cooley LD: Validation of the Agilent 244K oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization platform for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2009, 132(3):349–360. 10.1309/AJCP1BOUTWF6ERYSView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu S, Kielt M, Stegner AL, Kibiryeva N, Bittel DC, Cooley LD: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for the verification of genomic imbalances detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2009, 13(6):751–760. 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0056View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhao; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.