Open Access

Erratum to: Characterization of a prenatally assessed de novo supernumerary minute ring chromosome 20 in a phenotypically normal male

  • Sofia Kitsiou-Tzeli1,
  • Emmanouil Manolakos2Email author,
  • Magdalini Lagou2,
  • Katerina Anagnostopoulou3,
  • Maria Kontodiou2,
  • Nadezda Kosyakova4,
  • Elisabeth Ewers4,
  • Anja Weise4,
  • Antonios Garas5,
  • Sandro Orru6,
  • Thomas Liehr4 and
  • Aikaterini Metaxotou2
Molecular Cytogenetics20092:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-2-8

Received: 3 February 2009

Accepted: 20 February 2009

Published: 20 February 2009

The original article was published in Molecular Cytogenetics 2009 2:1

Correction

After publication of this work [1], we noted that we inadvertently failed to include the complete list of all coauthors. The full list of all authors has now been added and the Authors' contributions and Competing interests section modified accordingly.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Athens, Aghia Sofia Children's Hospital
(2)
Bioiatriki S.A
(3)
Genomedica S.A
(4)
Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology
(5)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Thessaly
(6)
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cagliari, Binaghi Hospital

References

  1. Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Manolakos E, Lagou M, Kontodiou M, Kosyakova N, Ewers E, Weise A, Garas A, Orru S, Liehr T, Metaxotou A: Characterization of a prenatally assessed de novo supernumerary minute ring chromosome 20 in a phenotypically normal male. Mol Cytogenet 2009, 2: 1. 10.1186/1755-8166-2-1PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kitsiou-Tzeli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement