Skip to main content

Table 2 Somatic/gonadal mosaicism for non centromeric rearrangement in asymptomatic carriers with affected offspring

From: Somatic/gonadal mosaicism for structural autosomal rearrangements: female predominance among carriers of gonadal mosaicism for unbalanced rearrangements

Reference

Karyotype

Carrier's age at birth of the proband

Proportion of abnormal cell line(s)

Indication for testing

Unbalanced rearrangements

N/del

    

Galan-Gomez et al., 1994 [37]

46,XX/46,XX,del(5)(p14-pter)

ns

ns

children with 5p- syndrome

Johnson et al., 2000 [38]

46,XY/46,XY,del(5)(p14)

ns

100% BL, 99% SF

affected child with the same deletion

McDonald et al., 1988 [39] (family 3)

46,XX/46,XX,del(5)(p14)

ns

ns

a child with del(5)

Niebuhr, 1978 [40]

46,XX/46,XX,del(5)(p14)

ns

5% BL, 3% SF

a child and fetus with the same Rea

Van Tuinen et al., 2001 [41]

46,XX/46,XX,del(5)(p14.2)

ns

4% BL

a child with cri-du-chat syndrome

Brandriff et al., 1988 [42]

46, XX/46,XX,del(13)(q22q32)

ns

0% BL, 0% SF a)

a chid and fetus with the same Rea

Michalova et al., 1982 [43]

46,XX/46,XX,del(13)(q12->q31)

18 yr

3% BL

child with retinoblastoma

Kokkonen, Leisti, 2000 [44]

46,XX/46,XX,del(15)(q11q13)

ns

0% BL b)

two affected children

Rump et al., 2008 [45]

46,XX/46,XX,del(15)(q26.2->qter)

ns

0% BL b)

two children with del(15)

Sanchez et al., 2014 [46]

46,XX/46,XX, del(15)(q11.2q13)

ns

0% BL, 0% normal SF, 35% hypopigmented SF

dyzygotic twins with Angelman syndrome

Hoo et al., 1985 [47]

46,XX/46,XX,del(16)(q11.1q12.1)

22 yr

0% BL, 0% SF c)

two children with del(16)

Garcia-Heras et al., 2005 [48]

46,XX/46,XX,del(20)(p11.1p12)

33 yr

25% BL

child with the same deletion

N/dup

    

Eussen et al., 2007 [49]

46,XX/46,XX,inv dup(2)(q34q33)

28 yr

19% BL

two children with the same Rea

Bernardini et al., 2005 [50]

46,XX/46,XX,dup(4)(p15p15)

young

30% BL, 20-25% different tissues

three abortions with the same Rea

Toska et al., 2010 [51]

46,XX/46,XX,dup(4)(q22.2q23)

24 yr

0% BL b)*

two siblings with dup(4)

Fan et al., 2001 [52] (family 2)

46,XY/46,XY,dup(8)(p21.3p23.1)

ns

20% BL

two children with the same Rea

Tonk et al., 1996 [53]

46,XX/46,XX,dir dup(10)(q24.2->q24.3)

ns

10%

two children with dup(10)

Hocking et al., 1999 [54]

46,XY/46,XY,dup(13)(q32q34)

ns

ns

a child with the same Rea

Babovic-Vuksanovic et al., 1998 [55]

46,XX/46,XX,dup(17)(q24q25.1)

16 yr

29% BL

recurrent abortins, two children with dup(17)

Flowers et al., 2015 [56]

46,XX/46,XX,dup(18)(q12.1q21.1)

38 yr

20% BL

a fetus with the same Rea

N/ring

    

Meza-Espinoza et al., 2008 [57]

46,XY/46,XY, r(17)

ns

4% BL

a child with multiple anomalies with the same Rea

Fryns et al., 1992 [58]

46,XX/46,XX,r(18)(p11.3q23)

26 yr

8% BL

polymalformed child with r(18)

Flejter et al., 1996 [59]

46,XX/46,XX,r(19)

27 yr

4% BL

affected child with the same Rea

Phelan, 2008 [60]

46,XX/46,XX,r(22)

ns

ns

affected child with the same Rea

N/t unbalanced

    

Engel et al., 2001 [61]

46,XX/46,XX,psudic(5;21)(q12.p13)

young

0% BL, 0% SF b)

two children with psudic (5;21)

Kouru et al., 2011 [62]

46,XX/45,XX,psu dic(5;22)(p15.p11.1)

ns

0% BL, 5% SF

a child and a fetus with the same Rea

Gijsbers et al., 2011 [63] (case 2)

46,XX/46,XX,der(22)t(8;22)(q24.2;p10)

ns

52% BL

affected daughter with the same Rea

Papenhausen et al., 1991 [64]

46,XX/46,XX,der(21)t(21;21;)(p11;q22.1)

29 yr

30% BL

a child with the same Rea

N/other rea

    

Al Arrayed, 1998 [65] (case 10)

46,XY/46,XY,multiple rea(2)

ns

ns

three abnormal children

Eckel et al., 2006 [66]

46,XX/46,XX,trp(12)(pter->p11.22->p12.3::p12.3->qter)

ns

12% BL

affected child with the same Rea

Masada et al., 1989 [67]

46,XY/46,XY, del(14)(q32.11->qter)/46,XY,dup(14)(q32.11->qter)

ns (mother 31 yr)

0% BL ,0% SF d)

a child with del(14), a child with dup(14)

Insley et al., 1968 [68]

46,XX/46,XX,Dq+

22 yr

2% BL, 3% SF

two daughters with the same Rea

D'Angelo et al., 2010 [69]

46,XX/46,XX,del(20)(p11.21)dup(20)(p11.21.p13)

23 yr

15% BL

affected daughter with the same Rea

Total

6 males 27 females

   

Balanced rearrangements

N/inv

    

Shapira et al., 1997 [22]

46,XY/46,XY,inv(9)(p24q34.1)

25 yr

25% BL

a child with recombinant 9p aneusomy

Wang et al., 2010 [70]

46,XY/46,XY,inv(20)(p12.2q13.33)

35 yr

50% BL

two children with recombinant chromosome 20

N/t balanced

    

Aurias et al., 1978 [71]

46,XX/46/XX,t(2;4)(q37;q28)

ns

ns

a child with der(4) t(2;4)(q37;q28)

Becker, Albert, 1963 [72]

46,XY/45,XY,nonacrocentric t(2;21)

23

55% BL

neurofibromatosis, a child with Down syndrome

Gardner et al., 1994 [73] (case 7)

46,XX/46,XX,rcp(5;18)(p15;q21)

ns

0,1% BL, 0% SF

a child with der (18)

Simonova et al., 2005 [74]

46,XY/46,XY,t(5;20)(p12;q13)

ns

8% BL

a child with del(5)

Sciorra et al., 1992 [75]

46,XY/46,XY,t(7;14)(q36;q1?)

ns (mother 31 yr)

0.5% BL, 0% SF

a child with 7q+

Opheim et al., 1995 [76] (case 2)

46,XX/46,XX,t(8;13)(p23.2;q21.2)

ns

57% BL

a child with der(8)t(8;13)

Yatsenko et al., 2009 [77]

46,XX/46,XX,ins(12)(q12p11.1p13.1)

ns

50% BL

two children with Noonan syndrome and the same Rea

Total

5 males 4 females

   
  1. a) ovarian germinal mosaicism deduced from absence of the Rea in sperm chromosomes
  2. b) ovarian germinal mosaicism deduced from molecular analysis
  3. c) maternal origin proved by 16qh heteromorphism
  4. d) paternal origin proved by 14p heteromorphism