MYB deregulation from a EWSR1-MYB fusion at leukemic evolution of a JAK2V617F positive primary myelofibrosis

Background Although Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPN) are usually not aggressive, the type and the number of molecular lesions impact greatly on leukemic transformation. Indeed, the molecular background underlying progression is still largely unexplored even though ASXL1, IDH1/2, SRSF2, and TP53 mutations, together with adverse karyotypic changes, place the patient at high risk of leukemic transformation. Case presentation Our patient, a 64-year old man with a diagnosis of JAK2V617F primary myelofibrosis (PMF) had an unusually rapid leukemic transformation. Genomic profiling showed that TET2 and SRSF2 mutations were also present. At leukemic transformation, the patient developed a complex chromosome rearrangement producing a EWSR1-MYB fusion. Remarkably, the expression of MYB and of its target BCL2 was, respectively, ≥4.7 and ≥2.8 fold higher at leukemic transformation than after chemotherapy, when the patient obtained the hematological remission. At this time point, the EWSR1-MYB fusion disappeared while JAK2V617F, TET2, and SRSF2 mutations, as well as PMF morphological features persisted. Conclusions Rapid leukemic transformation of JAK2V617F PMF was closely linked to a previously undescribed putative EWSR1-MYB transcription factor which was detected only at disease evolution. We hypothesize that the EWSR1-MYB contributed to leukemia transformation through at least two mechanisms: 1) it sustained MYB expression, and consequently deregulated its target BCL2, a putative onco-suppressor gene; and 2) ectopic EWSR1-MYB expression probably fulfilled its own oncogenic potential as demonstrated for other MYB-fusions. As our study confirmed that MYB is recurrently involved in chronic as well as leukemic transformation of PMF, it appears to be a valid molecular marker for tailored treatments. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13039-016-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.


Background
Ph-MPN are usually not aggressive malignancies. Evolution into Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) occurs iñ 2 % of Polycythemia Vera (PV), 1 % of Essential Thrombocytopenia (ET), and 10-20 % of PMF, considering the first decade of disease. Although, transformation rates increase with genotoxic therapy, leukemic transformation is part of the natural history of these disorders as AML also occurs in treatment-naive patients [1,2].
Genomic profiling of Ph-MPN is useful for understanding the pathobiology of leukemic transformation and improving prognostic stratification of patients and treatment. During leukemic transformation very few new mutations are acquired and the majority of somatic mutations are already present in the chronic phase. Two or more mutations affecting ASXL1, IDH1/2, SRSF2, and TP53, are considered high-risk events. Besides mutations, unfavourable (chromosome 3, 5 or 7 rearrangements), and very unfavourable (chromosome 17 abnormalities) karyotypic changes impact upon prognosis [3,4]. In any case, the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression from Ph-MPN to AML are not yet completely understood [5][6][7][8][9].
Longitudinal genomic investigation into a unique case of JAK2 V617F positive PMF with rapid leukemic evolution, detected a leukemia-specific complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 6, 9 and 22 which produced an aberrant EWSR1-MYB transcription factor. EWSR1-MYB ectopic expression, as well as high expression of MYB and its target BCL2, likely contributed to the leukemia phenotype. It is worth mentioning that, high level of MYB expression blocks differentiation and confers selfrenewal properties to leukemic cells, whereas the expression of the anti-apoptotic BCL2 protein inhibits leukemic cell death [10][11][12].

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) for MYB and BCL2
MYB expression was investigated in our patient, at all time points, and in 7 PMF cases (four at leukemic transformation and three in paired chronic phase/leukemic transformation) (TaqMan assay probe Hs00920556_m1; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Negative controls were four healthy BM samples. Positive controls were 12 acute leukemias with high MYB expression (4 RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML, 4 AML with MLL translocations, and 4 BCR-ABL1-positive B-cell ALL) [14]. Expression of BCL2, a known MYB target, was also investigated in our case (TaqMan assay probe Hs00608023_m1, Applied Biosystems). Amplifications were normalized to the endogenous reference control ABL1 (Hs00245445_m1, Applied Biosystems) (Additional file 1).

Molecular cytogenetic and mutational analyses
Multi-FISH and whole chromosome paints showed chromosome 22q11-q12 material inserted into chromosome 6q23 and revealed an additional rearrangement between der (22) and an apparently normal chromosome 9 ( Fig. 1b) (Additional file 3: Figure S1). The breakpoint occurred at 6q23 within the MYB oncogene (Additional file 3: Figure S2). Fosmids for EWSR1 and the EWSR1-MYB assay showed that the 5′EWSR1 was inserted into the MYB locus ( Fig.1c) (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The EWSR1-MYB rearrangement was not detected at chronic phase or in 3 consecutive samples analyzed after chemotherapy and during treatment with 5-AZA (Table 1).

RT-PCR and qRT-PCR
At leukemic transformation an in-frame fusion transcript EWSR1-MYB with breakpoint in EWSR1 exon 7 (nt 927) (NM_013986.3) and MYB exon 2 (nt 223) (NM_001130173.1) was detected. The 954 aminoacids predicted fusion protein retained the EWSR1 transcriptionalactivating domain (TAD) at the N-terminal and all MYB functional domains at the C-terminal (Fig. 1e). After chemotherapy, at hematological and cytogenetic remission, the EWSR1-MYB fusion disappeared. At leukemic phase, MYB and BCL2 expression was respectively ≥4.7 and ≥2.8 fold higher than at remission. High MYB expression was detected in 7 PMF and in the 3 groups of acute leukemia used as positive controls (Fig. 1f).

Discussion
This case of JAK2-positive PMF with very rapid evolution to AML had a specific mutational profile at diagnosis bearing mutations of JAK2, SRSF2 and TET2. A complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 6, 9, and 22, which produced a previously undescribed EWSR1-MYB fusion, underlies the leukemic transformation.
EWSR1 is a member of the TET (TLS, EWSR1, TAFII68) protein family which acts as multifunctional protein and  regulates transcription and mRNA splicing to maintain cellular homeostasis. Although well known in soft tissue sarcoma, EWSR1 fusions have only occasionally been detected in leukemia [15][16][17][18][19]. Interestingly, all EWSR1 fusions retained the TAD portion at the N-terminal and the partner DNA Binding Domain (DBD) at the C-terminal. Since EWSR1-FLI1, the most frequent sarcoma-associated fusion, acted as an aberrant transcription factor, deregulating several targets [20], one might speculate that the EWSR1-MYB fusion in our patient also acted as an aberrant transcription factor, altering the MYB transcriptional program. MYB is a leucin zipper transcription factor which plays a key role in cell proliferation and differentiation [21][22][23]. High level of MYB is common in AML associated with BCR-ABL1, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, MYST3-CREBBP, or MLLrearrangements [11,12,24]. Chromosomal aberrations placing MYB under the promoter of a partner gene, such as TCRB-MYB in T-cell ALL [14,25] or in close proximity of super-enhancer regions, such as MYB-NFIB in adenoid cystic carcinoma [26], caused MYB over-expression. It is worth noting, however, that besides promoting tumour growth through MYB over-expression, the MYB fusions might have their own oncogenic potential as demonstrated for the MYB-QKI in pediatric angiocentric glioma, which drives tumor development in vitro and in vivo models [27].
High MYB level confers self-renewal properties on leukemic cells and blocks differentiation, thus it has been regarded as a putative therapeutic target [11,12]. Indeed, in vitro and in vivo studies showed that a slight MYB drop is enough to block leukemic cell proliferation without affecting normal haematopoiesis [28]. The present study confirmed two previous reports of high MYB expression in PMF [29,30] as it was detected in all cases at chronic phase with a rising trend at leukemic transformation (Fig. 1f ).
In determining whether and how the aberrant EWSR1-MYB transcription factor played a role in rapid disease progression, paired longitudinal studies showed that the EWSR1-MYB fusion was closely linked to leukemic transformation, as it was not detected at diagnosis and disappeared after treatment. As a functional consequence of MYB deregulation we investigated BCL2 expression as it is a well-known MYB target which acts as an anti-apoptotic onco-suppressor. Recent findings in leukemia xenograft models showed that sustained MYB expression maintained high BCL2 expression and consequently, inhibited leukemic cell death [10]. In line with these data, we found that MYB as well as BCL2 expression was higher at leukemic transformation than after treatment (Fig. 1g).
Our patient responded to treatment by regressing from AML to PMF maintaining JAK2, TET2 and SRSF2 mutations. Therefore, the JAK2-positive clone, showed a constant allele burden in all disease phases, marking the PMF stem line which persisted throughout disease, while the EWSR1-MYB fusion was the hallmark of the leukemic clone. Whether EWSR1-MYB affected a JAK2 V617F cell or developed as an independent clone, could not be established. Interestingly Engle E.K. et al. [31], identified MYB mutations in a complex PMF subclonal branching.

Conclusion
We report a unique case of JAK2 V617F PMF. Rapid leukemia transformation, due to complex cytogenetic rearrangement, produced a previously undescribed EWSR1-MYB fusion that appeared to act as an aberrant transcription factor deregulating BCL2. Our study provided new insights to point to MYB as a good molecular target in patients presenting with high-risk PMF [11,32].

Additional files
Additional file 1: Detailed materials/methods and results. (DOC 68 kb) Additional file 2: Table S1. FISH clones for chromosome 6 long arm breakpoint characterization. Table S2. FISH clones for chromosome 22 long arm telomeric breakpoint characterization. Table S3. FISH clones for chromosome 9 long arm breakpoint characterization. Table S4. Genes, amplicons and primers for mutational analysis. (DOC 991 kb) Additional file 3: Figure S1. Multi-FISH analysis showed a complex rearrangement between chromosomes 6, 9 and 22 (yellow arrows). Figure S2. A) Chromosome 6q23 breakpoint within MYB. B) Chromosome 22q11.2 breakpoint within EWSR1. Figure S3. A) SNPa findings at PMF diagnosis: no CNV with 100 and 50 Kb filters (left panel) but LOH at 12q (right panel, black arrow). B) SNPa findings at leukemic transformation: a genomic loss, at 22q11.2, was identified with a 50 Kb filter (left panel, red arrow); LOH at 12q (right panel, red arrow). (DOC 3447 kb) Availability of data and materials Not applicable.
Authors' contributions RLS and CM conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; TP and DDG wrote the paper; TP and VP performed and analyzed FISH experiments; GB performed and analyzed SNP array; DDG and PG performed and analyzed RT-PCR and qRT-PCR; AGLF, FP, TI performed targeted mutational analysis and analyzed results; FF determined JAK2 V617F allelic burden. All Authors approved the manuscript.

Competing interests
Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's relatives for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.