Skip to main content

Table 2 Results from G-banding technique related to imunophenotype of each patient (130)

From: Banding cytogenetic analysis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a Brazilian population

N

Karyotype

Cell type

Classification of cytogenetic alteration

Ploidy

1

42 ~ 45,XX, -3[3], -13[3], -20[4][cp7] /46,XX [13]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

3

45 ~ 56,XY, +4[3], +8[4], +11[3], +18[4], +20[3], +21[4][cp20] / 46, XY [05]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

4

46,XY [20]

ALL pre-B (L3)

Normal

-

5

46, XX [13]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Normal

-

6

46, XX [23]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Normal

-

7

46,XY, del(4)(p14?) [09] / 46,XY [11]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Structural

Pseudodiploidy

8

49 ~ 58,XX, +5[4], +9[3], +11[3], +15[4], +21[4], +22[3] [cp9] / 46,XX [02]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

9

46,XY [23]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Normal

-

11

48, XY, t (1;3) (q32;q27), +16, + mar[09] / 46, XY [14]

ALL pre-B (L2)

Numerical + structural

Hyperdiploidy+add

12

49 ~ 87, XX , +1[5], +3[4], +5[5], +7[5], +10[4], +12[6], +13[04], add(14)(q32?), add(16)(p13.3), +18[6], +19[4], +20[3], +21[6], +22[5][cp30]

ALL Pre-B (L1)

Numerical + structural

Hyperdiploidy+add

13

49~54, XY, +3[3], +5[4], +8[4], +10[3], +17[4], +21[4][cp11] / 46,XY [04]

ALL pre-B (L3)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

14

46,XX,del(11)(q23) [17]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Structural

Pseudodiploidy

15

41~45,XY, -5[3], -7[3], -21[4][cp13] / 46,XY[07]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hypodiploidy

16

50~61,XX, +2[3], +4[4], +10[4], +12[3],+16[4], +19[5], +21[4][cp7] / 46,XX[05]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

17

48~60,XY, +3[4], +5[5], +7[4], +13[4], +17[3], +20[4], +21[4][cp22] / 46,XY[05]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

18

49~58,XY, +1[4], +6[4], +7[5], +22[3][cp9] / 46,XY[11]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

19

46,XY, dup(1)(q31q44) [12] / 46,XY, dup(13)(q13q34) [05] / 46,XY, der(21) t(7;21) (q21q36;q22.3) [04] / 46,XY [04]

ALL – B (L3)

Structural

Pseudodiploidy

20

46, XX, -7, + der 7 t(7;?)(q31;?) [30]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical + structural

Pseudodiploidy

23

53~62,XX, +5[4], +8[4], +12[3], +16[4], +18[3], +20[4], +21[4][cp7]/46,XX[15]

ALL-B (L2)

Numerical

Hyperdiploidy

24

46,XX[19]

ALL pre-B (L3)

Normal

-

25

46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11), add(14)(q32) [20]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Structural

Pseudodiploidy

26

47,XY,i(7)(q10), +21c[22] /48,idem, +mar[4] / 48, XY, i(7)(q10), +8, +21c [03]

ALL pre-B (L1)

Numerical + structural

Hyperdiploidy+add

27

46,XY [20]

ALL – T (L2)

Normal

-

28

38~45,XX, t(9;14), (q22?;q32?), del(20)(q?) [21]

ALL pré-B (L2)

Numerical + strutural

Hypodiploidy+add

29

46,XY [20]

ALL pré-B

Normal

-

30

36~45,XY, -4[3], -7[4], -9[3], -11[3], -22[4] [cp23] / 46,XY [03]

ALL pré-B

Numerical

Hypodiploidy

  1. Legend: Samples 2, 10, 21 and 22 had null Mitotic Index (MI=0). Complex karyotypes are highlighted in bold character in the table (N=7). L1: acute lymphoblastic leukemia type 1; L2: acute lymphoblastic leukemia type 2; L3: acute lymphoblastic leukemia type 3. inv - inversion; mar – marker chromosome; t – translocation; i – isochromosome; add – additional chromosome; dup – duplication; der – derivative chromosome; Ph+ - Philadelphia chromosome; del – deletion; p – short arm of the chromosome; q – long arm of the chromosome, [ ] cells number analyzed.
  2. Complex karyotype are highlighted in the table (N=7).