Open Access

A non-syndromic intellectual disability associated with a de novo microdeletion at 7q and 18p, microduplication at Xp, and 18q partial trisomy detected using chromosomal microarray analysis approach

  • Irene Plaza Pinto1, 3,
  • Lysa Bernardes Minasi1, 3,
  • Alex Silva da Cruz1, 2,
  • Aldaires Vieira de Melo4,
  • Damiana Míriam da Cruz e Cunha1, 3,
  • Rodrigo Roncato Pereira2,
  • Cristiano Luiz Ribeiro1,
  • Claudio Carlos da Silva1, 3, 6,
  • Daniela de Melo e Silva1, 5 and
  • Aparecido Divino da Cruz1, 2, 3, 4, 6Email author
Molecular Cytogenetics20147:44

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-44

Received: 10 March 2014

Accepted: 20 June 2014

Published: 27 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Chromosome abnormalities that segregate with a disease phenotype can facilitate the identification of disease loci and genes. The relationship between chromosome 18 anomalies with severe intellectual disability has attracted the attention of cytogeneticists worldwide. Duplications of the X chromosome can cause intellectual disability in females with variable phenotypic effects, due in part to variations in X-inactivation patterns. Additionally, deletions of the 7qter region are associated with a range of phenotypes.

Results

We report the first case of de novo microdeletion at 7q and 18p, 18q partial trisomy, microduplication at Xp associated to intellectual disability in a Brazilian child, presenting a normal karyotype. Karyotyping showed any chromosome alteration. Chromosomal microarray analysis detected a de novo microdeletion at 18p11.32 and 18q partial trisomy, an inherited microdeletion at 7q31.1 and a de novo microduplication at Xp22.33p21.3.

Conclusions

Our report illustrates a case that presents complex genomic imbalances which may contribute to a severe clinical phenotypes. The rare and complex phenotypes have to be investigated to define the subsets and allow the phenotypes classification.

Keywords

Intellectual disability CMA 18q partial trisomy Microdeletion Microduplication Mosaicism

Background

Chromosome abnormalities that segregate with a disease phenotype can facilitate the identification of disease loci and genes. The relationship between chromosome 18 anomalies with severe intellectual disability (ID) has attracted the attention of cytogeneticists worldwide [1]. Moreover, the partial trisomy of the chromosome 18 is a rare genetic chromosomal syndrome, corresponding to a variant and less severe form of Edwards’s Syndrome (OMIM 300484). For this condition, the severity of the symptoms and the phenotype is highly variable depending on the extension of chromosome involvement and the level of compromised cells and tissues [2].

Eighty percent of the cases of Edwards’s Syndrome present full trisomy, the other 20% present mosaic or partial 18 trisomy [1]. After birth, mosaic chromosomal abnormalities are essentially identified among individuals with phenotypic manifestation of recognizable aneuploidy (chromosomal) syndromes. Mosaic aneuploidy involving 18 chromosome was classified as a frequent mosaic autosomal aneuploidy [3].

Several genomic disorders have been linked to X chromosome. Duplications of the X chromosome can cause ID in females with variable phenotypic effects, due in part to variations in X-inactivation patterns [4]. It has been estimated that up to 30% of genes on the short arm of the X chromosome could escape inactivation and undergo gene expression in cells and tissues [5]. Deletions of the 7qter region are associated with a range of phenotypes, and clinical findings comprise low birth weight, mental retardation, development delay, facial dysmorphisms and genitourinary malformations [6, 7].

Here in we report the first case of de novo microdeletion at 7q and 18p, 18q partial trisomy, microduplication at Xp associated to a non-syndromic intellectual disability in a Brazilian child, presenting a normal karyotype.

Case presentation

A 4-years old female patient born to non-consanguineous parents, at 39 weeks gestation to a 33-year-old mother and 47-year-old father, and her birth weight was 2325 g. Child delivery was carried out through a caesarean section procedure. Physical examination of the proband reveled delayed psychomotor development, severe intellectual disability, and a height of 94,5 cm (<7rd), a weight of 9500 g (<7rd). Her craniofacial dysmorphisms included an oblong face with a prominent forehead/frontal bossing, a bulbous nasal tip on a small nose and abnormal teeth. She also had hypertelorism, lower ear implantation and limb weakness. The family history was unremarkable on both sides.

Results

Karyotyping at about 550 band resolution showed the proband with a female karyotype (46,XX), without any suggestion of chromosome alteration (Figure 1). Her parents also presented normal karyotype. CMA detected four genomic imbalances in the patient’s genome, corresponding to a de novo 1.23 Mb microdeletion at 18p11.32(136,226-1,369,804)x1 [NCBI 37.3/hg19] with 30% mosaicism, a 18q partial trisomy with 40% mosaicism (Figure 2), an inherited 386.73 kbp microdeletion at 7q31.1(110,923,434-111,310,159)x1 [NCBI 37.3/hg19] and a de novo 25.72 Mb microduplication at Xp22.33p21.3(168,546-25,887,307)x3 [NCBI 37.3/hg19] (Figure 3). The progenitor’s CMA confirmed de novo genomic imbalances in their child (Table 1).
Figure 1

G-banded karyotype. Displaying no numerical or structural karyotype deviations (46,XX).

Figure 2

CMA depicts genomic imbalances in chromosome 18. The microarray profile of the 18p11.32 microdeletion is represented by the bold red line and the 18q partial trisomy is represented by the bold blue line, both in mosaicism.

Figure 3

CMA data of the proband with genomic imbalances in 7 and X chromosomes. Analysis showing (A) a deletion segment at 7q31.1 and (B) duplication segment at Xp22.33p21.3 from patient.

Table 1

Clinical and molecular features of patient

Clinical features*

Age (yo)

Sex

CNV

Mosaic (%)

Cytoband

Size (Mb)

Marker count

Microarray nomenclature

Number of genes

Selected OMIN Morbid Genes**

Origin

Interpretation

GDD, MS, MCA

4

F

Loss

 

7q31.1

0.39

265

7q31.1(110,923,434-111,310,159)x1

1

IMMP2L

Inherited mat

LP

Loss

30

18p11.32

1.23

1400

18p11.32(136,226-1,369,804)x1

11

ADCYAP1

de novo

LP

Gain

40

18q11.1

 

53197

18q11.1q23(18,608,373-78,014,123)x 2-3

 

18q Partial Trissomy

de novo

Pathogenic

   

Gain

 

Xp22.33

25.72

31456

Xp22.33p21.3(168,546-25,887,307)x3

147

NLGN4X, AP1S2, NHS, CDKL5, RPS6KA3, MBTPS2, SMS, ARX

de novo

Pathogenic

*GDD = Global Developmental Delay; MS = Multiple Stigmas, MCA = Multiple Congential Anomalies; **Genes related to ID/Autsm; yo = years old; LP = Likely Pathogenic.

Discussion

In our study, the use of microarray analyses allowed the identification of genomic rearrangements in a girl severely affected with intellectual disability, multiple congenital abnormalities and intense dysmorphology, despite her normal karyotype.

CMA showed 386.73 kbp microdeletion at 7q31.1, inherited from her mother, likely pathogenic because harbor IMMP2L gene that, according to authors, deletions involving this gene have been associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [8], autism [9], and Tourette syndrome [10]. Moreover, the IMMP2L gene was also found in inherited rare CNV-associated gene set in ADHD patients [8].

Furthermore, we observed two genomic imbalances at 18 chromosome. A de novo mosaic microdeletion at 18p11.32, a genomic imbalance comprising 11 genes, and the gene only was ADCYAP1, also known as PACAP, related to intellectual disability [11]. Additionally, the monosomy of 18p chromosome refers to a chromosomal disorder, resulting from the absence of all or part of the short arm, and the clinical features frequently include mild to moderate mental retardation, short stature, and speech delay [12].

On the other hand, the most relevant alteration observed was a de novo 18q partial trisomy with 40% mosaicism. The degree of clinical manifestations in a patient who presents partial trisomy of chromosome 18 is variable, generally include a relatively mild phenotype with a high survival rate [1]. In the partial trisomy form, only a segment of the chromosome 18q is present in triplicate, often resulting from a balanced translocation or an inversion carried by one parent. This type of trisomy accounts for approximately 2% of cases presenting with the Edward’s phenotype. The location and the extent of the triplicated segment and the possible associated deletion of genomic material due to unbalanced translocation can explain the variable phenotype associated with partial trisomies [13].

The clinical findings are highly variable in a phenotypic spectrum that spans from the absence of dysmorphic features with normal intelligence to the complete trisomy 18 syndrome. Thus, clinical and cytogenetic diagnostic of chromosome 18 partial trisomy in mosaic state is a challenge for both medical and laboratory personnel. The etiologic factors for mosaic trisomy 18 are unknown, but advanced maternal age is an important factor that increases the risk of chromosomal nondisjunction in offspring. Nevertheless, the association between paternal age (40 years of age or older) and chromosomal abnormalities may be investigated [14, 15].

We also found a de novo 25.72 Mb microduplication at Xp22.33p21.3, involving 109 genes. However, only 8 OMIM morbid genes have been described in association with intellectual disability, namely: NLGN4X, AP1S2, NHS, CDKL5, RPS6KA3, MBTPS2, SMS, ARX. Interstitial duplications of the short arm of the X chromosome have been rarely described. Female carriers of partial Xp duplication exhibit variable developmental defects, because of random or selective inactivation of X chromosome [16].

The encoded protein NLGN4X belongs to a family of neuronal cell surface proteins and mutations in this gene has been associated with autism and Asperger’s Syndrome (OMIM 300497). Pathogenic mutations in the X-linked NLGN4X in autism spectrum disorders and/or mental retardation are rare [16].

Moreover, the encode protein AP1S2 is a member of the adaptin protein family, disruption of the AP1 complex via mutations in AP1S2 could disrupt normal neurotransmitter processing within the synapse [17].

The encoded protein NHS may function during the development of the eyes, teeth and brain. Mutations in the NHS gene are related to Nance-Horan’s Syndrome (OMIM 302350), which is characterized by bilateral congenital cataracts, dental anomalies, craniofacial abnormalities and, in some cases, mental retardation. It is important in the limbic system, given the range of neuropsychological abnormalities, including mental retardation, autism, aggression, anxiety, stereotypical behavior and mood disturbance [18].

The CDKL5 gene is a member of Ser/Thr kinase family and encodes a phosphorylated protein with a kinase activity. According to some researchers, female with CDKL5 mutations experience no regression and the delay of psychomotor development is present since birth [19]. Alterations involving CDKL5 have also been found in some patients with Hanefeld variants, a congenital form of Rett Syndrome, an X-linked dominant severe neurodevelopmental disorder that affect almost exclusively girls. Moreover, mutation or chromosomal translocations involving CDKL5 have also been identified in patients with infantile spasms associated with mental retardation and in West’s Syndrome (OMIM 308350) patients [20].

The RPS6KA3 gene encodes a member of the RSK (ribosomal S6 kinase) family of Ser/Thr kinases. The activity of this protein has been implicated in controlling cell growth and differentiation. Mutations in the RPS6KA3 gene were first reported in Coffin-Lowry Syndrome (OMIM 303600) [21], and this gene also affects nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability and nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability without bone abnormalities [22]. In addition, one case was reported in which a boy with mild ID and a maternally inherited microduplication at Xp22.12. The duplicated region included RPS6KA3, a key gene related to mental retardation or intellectual disability in humans [21].

The MBTPS2 gene encodes a intramembrane zinc metalloprotease, which is essential in development, and mutation in this gene can cause the Ichthyosis Follicularis, Atrichia, and Photophobia Syndrome, with or without BRESHECK Syndrome (OMIM 308205), which is an X-linked multiple congenital anomaly disorder with variable severity, and some patients have additional features, including mental retardation [23].

Conclusion

This is the first case of a Brazilian child reported with complex genomic alterations involving chromosomes 7, 18 and X that went undetected by banding cytogenetics. However, the complex rearrangements were detected by chromosomal microarray analysis using clinical relevant probes. Synergistic effects from the rare genomic imbalances is likely responsible for the severe observed clinical phenotype in the proband. Further studies are required to define the role of the genes presented in this report to define the physiopathology of phenotypes similar to the one described here.

The rare and complex phenotypes need to be investigated to define the subsets and allow the phenotypes classification. Furthermore, this will allow adequate clinical management and a better follow up of the proband and the family.

Materials and methods

Following the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás ethics approval (CAAE 0051.0.168.000-11) an informed consent was signed and peripheral blood was obtained for cytogenetic studies including karyotyping and CMA. Conventional cell culture, harvesting, and GTG banding followed standardized procedures [24]. Chromosome analyses were done using the software IKAROS® (Metasystems Corporation, Germany).

After karyotyping, the array analysis were performed on both patient and her parents, in order to determine the origin of potential DNA imbalances, either de novo or inherited. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using QIAamp® DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). Total DNA (250 ng) was amplified, labeled, and hybridized using GeneChip CytoScanTM HD array protocols (Affymetrix, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The array was designed specifically for cytogenetic research, including ≈ 2,696,550 CNV markers, 743,304 SNP markers, and > 1,953,246 non-polymorphic markers. CEL files obtained by scanning the arrays were analyzed using the Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) software (Affymetrix, USA). Gains and losses that affected a minimum of 50 and 25 markers, respectively, in a 100 kb length were initially considered.

CNVs were classified according to their nature, based on [25, 26]. In summary, the CNVs found in each patient and their biological parents were compared with genomic variants in public databases, including Database of Genomic Variants (DGV), Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans using Ensemble Resources (DECIPHER), and CytoScan™ HD Array Database. CNVs were classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and of unknown clinical significance, according to [24, 25]. CMA analysis followed the manufacter’s instruction regarding mosaic, which follows the same principle of a complete CNV, a mosaic call was made by the software and included a clear result in SmoothSignal and Allele Peaks.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients for publication of this report and the accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CMA: 

Chromosomal microarray analysis

CNV: 

Copy number variation

ID: 

Intellectual disability

ChAS: 

Chromosome analysis suite

ASD: 

Autism spectrum disorders.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Rinaldo W. Pereira and the Rede ExeGenes for supporting the betterment of genetic diagnosis in Central Brazil. This work was sponsored by a grant from CNPq (Edital 031/564465/2010-10) and FAPEG (2011.6002.19.1847.1134-03).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Biologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Núcleo de Pesquisas Replicon
(2)
Universidade Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia
(3)
Departamento de Biologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Mestrado em Genética, Programa de Pós Graduação Mestrado em Genética
(4)
Universidade Federal de Goiás, Programa de Pós Graduação em Biotecnologia e Biodiversidade, Rede Centro Oeste de Pós Graduação, Pesquisa e Inovação
(5)
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Laboratório de Genética e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Goiás
(6)
Laboratório de Citogenética Humana e Genética Molecular, Secretaria do Estado da Saúde de Goiás (LACEN/SESGO)

References

  1. Cho AR, Kim HR, Lee MK, Yun SW, Lee JJ: Partial trisomy of chromosome 18q11.2-q12: a case report. Korean J Pedatr 2009, 52: 1171–1174.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. d’Orsi G, Pascarella MG, Pansini A, Buonadonna AL, Trivisano M, Pacillo F, Carapelle E, Demaio V, Minervini M, Gentile M, Specchio LM: Partial trisomy 18q and epileptic spasms induced by eating associated with bilateral opecular dysplasia. Am J Med Genet Part A 2013, 161A: 1194–1195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB: Somatic genome variations in health and disease. Curr Genomics 2010,11(6):387–96.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Holden ST, Clarkson A, Thomas NS, Abbott K, James MR, Willatt L: A de novo duplication of Xp11.22–p11.4 in a girl with intellectual disability, structural brain anomalies, and preferential inactivation of the normal X chromosome. Am J Med Gent Part A 2010, 152A: 1735–1740.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sheath KL, Mazzaschi RL, Aftimos S, Gregersen NE, George AM, Love DR: Clinical outcomes and counselling issues regarding partial trisomy of terminal Xp in a child with developmental delay. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med Jl 2013,13(2):311–317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Argiropoulos B, Carter M, Brierley K, Hare H, Bouchard A, Al-Hertani W, Ryan SR, Reid J, Basik M, McGowan-Jordan J, Graham GE: Discordant phenotypes in a mother and daughter with mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 19 explained by a de novo 7q36.2 deletion and 7p22.1 duplication. Am J Med Genet A 2011,155A(4):885–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pelegrino Kde O, Sugayama S, Catelani AL, Lezirovitz K, Kok F, Chauffaille ML: 7q36 deletion and 9p22 duplication: effects of a double imbalance. Mol Cytogenet 2013,6(1):2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Elia J, Gai X, Xie HM, Perin JC, Geiger E, Glessner JT, D’arcy M, DeBerardinis R, Frackelton E, Kim C, Lantieri F, Muganga BM, Wang L, Takeda T, Rappaport EF, Grant SF, Berrettini W, Devoto M, Shaikh TH, Hakonarson H, White PS: Rare structural variants found in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder are preferentially associated with neurodevelopmental genes. Mol Psychiatry 2010,15(6):637–46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maestrini E, Pagnamenta AT, Lamb JA, Bacchelli E, Sykes NH, Sousa I, Toma C, Barnby G, Butler H, Winchester L, Scerri TS, Minopoli F, Reichert J, Cai G, Buxbaum JD, Korvatska O, Schellenberg GD, Dawson G, de Bildt A, Minderaa RB, Mulder EJ, Morris AP, Bailey AJ, Monaco AP, IMGSAC: High-density SNP association study and copy number variation analysis of the AUTS1 and AUTS5 loci implicate the IMMP2L-DOCK4 gene region in autism susceptibility. Mol Psychiatry 2010, 15: 954–968.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Petek E, Windpassinger C, Vincent JB, Cheung J, Boright AP, Scherer SW, Kroisel PM, Wagner K: Disruption of a novel gene (IMMP2L) by a breakpoint in 7q31 associated with Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2001,68(4):848–58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Freson K, Hashimoto H, Thys C, Wittevrongel C, Danloy S, Morita Y, Shintani N, Tomiyama Y, Vermylen J, Hoylaerts MF, Baba A, Van Geet C: The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide is a physiological inhibitor of platelet activation. J Clin Invest 2004, 113: 905–912.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Turleau C: Monosomy 18p. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008, 3: 1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cereda A, Carey JC: The trisomy 18 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012, 7: 81–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitas AL, Paiva M, Cordeiro AI, Nunes L, Cordeiro-Ferreira G: Mosaic trisomy 18 in a five-month-old infant. Case Rep Pediatr 2013,2013(Article ID 929861):1–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tucker ME, Garringer HJ, Weaver DD: Phenotypic spectrum of mosaic trisomy 18: two new patients, a literature review, and counseling issues. Am J Med Genet A 2007,143(5):505–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Daoud H, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Védrine S, Demattéi MV, Vourc’h P, Bayou N, Andres CR, Barthélémy C, Laumonnier F, Briault S: Autism and nonsyndromic mental retardation associated with a de novo mutation in the NLGN4X gene promoter causing an increased expression level. Biol Psychiatry 2009, 66: 906–910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tarpey PS, Stevens C, Teague J, Edkins S, O’Meara S, Avis T, Barthorpe S, Buck G, Butler A, Cole J, Dicks E, Gray K, Halliday K, Harrison R, Hills K, Hinton J, Jones D, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Perry J, Raine K, Richardson D, Shepherd R, Small A, Tofts C, Varian J, West S, Widaa S, Yates A, Catford R, et al.: Mutations in the gene encoding the sigma 2 subunit of the adaptor protein 1 complex, AP1S2, cause X-linked mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 2006, 79: 1119–1124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chograni M, Rejeb I, Jemaa LB, Châabouni M, Bouhamed HC: The first missense mutation of NHS gene in a Tunisian family with clinical features of NHS syndrome including cardiac anomaly. Eur J Hum Genet 2011, 19: 851–856.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagebeuk EE, van den Bossche RA, de Weerd AW: Respiratory and sleep disorders in female children with atypical Rett syndrome caused by mutations in the CDKL5 gene. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013, 55: 480–484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Das DK, Mehta B, Menon SR, Raha S, Udani V: Novel Mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) gene in Indian cases of Rett Syndrome. Neuromol Med 2013, 15: 218–225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tejada MI, Martínez-Bouzas C, García-Ribes A, Larrucea S, Acquadro F, Cigudosa JC, Belet S, Froyen G, López-Aríztegui MA: A child with mild X-linked intellectual disability and a microduplication at Xp22.12 including RPS6KA3. Pediatrics 2011, 128: 1029–1033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsumoto A, Kuwajima M, Miyake K, Kojima K, Nakashima N, Jimbo EF, Kubota T, Momoi MY, Yamagata T: An Xp22.12 microduplication including RPS6KA3 identified in a family with variably affected intellectual and behavioral disabilities. J Hum Genet 2013, 58: 755–757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bornholdt D, Atkinson TP, Bouadjar B, Catteau B, Cox H, De Silva D, Fischer J, Gunasekera CN, Hadj-Rabia S, Happle R, Holder-Espinasse M, Kaminski E, König A, Mégarbané A, Mégarbané H, Neidel U, Oeffner F, Oji V, Theos A, Traupe H, Vahlquist A, van Bon BW, Virtanen M, Grzeschik KH: Genotype–Phenotype correlations emerging from the identification of missense mutations in MBTPS2. Hum Mutat 2013,34(4):587–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Verma RS, Babu A: Human chromosomes: Principles and Techiniques. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1995.Google Scholar
  25. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ, Faucett WA, Feuk L, Friedman JM, Hamosh A, Jackson L, Kaminsky EB, Kok K, Krantz ID, Kuhn RM, Lee C, Ostell JM, Rosenberg C, Scherer SW, Spinner NB, Stavropoulos DJ, Tepperberg JH, Thorland EC, Vermeesch JR, Waggoner DJ, Watson MS, et al.: Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010,86(5):749–764.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Battaglia A, Doccini V, Bernardini L, Novelli A, Loddo S, Capalbo A, Filippi T, Carey JC: Confirmation of chromosomal microarray as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders and dysmorphic features. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2013,17(6):589–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pinto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement