Assessment of ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification and protein expression in gastric carcinoma by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
© YK et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 November 2010
Accepted: 20 June 2011
Published: 20 June 2011
The goal of this study was to investigate ERBB2(HER2) and EGFR gene amplification and protein expression in gastric cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry were used to analyze ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification and protein expression in 69 cases of gastric cancer.
FISH analysis revealed that 20.3% of the cases exhibited ERBB2 gene amplification. Increases in ERBB2 copy number and gene amplification were present in 52.2% of the samples. Expression of the ERBB2 protein was observed in 42.0% of cases. FISH analysis detected EGFR gene amplification in 29.0% of samples. Increases in EGFR copy number and gene amplification occurred in 57.9% of samples, and EGFR protein expression was present in 52.2% of samples. Both ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification were 3 cases (4.3%), but abnormalities in both ERBB2 and EGFR gene copy number were present 36.2% of samples. ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification were significantly associated with the depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.05) and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05), but not with sex, age, or histological type (P > 0.05).
Our data indicated that ERBB2 and EGFR genetic abnormalities were associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. Clinical assessment of ERBB2 and EGFR amplification may represent an important factor for the development of personalized treatment programs for gastic cancer.
Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2(HER2)), also known as C-erbB-2, can lead to the activation of cellular signal transduction systems, resulting in the cellular transformation and cell proliferation events associated with cancer . ERBB2 is very similar in structure to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with approximately 95% homology between the 260 amino acid intracellular region (aa 727-986), which contains the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, and the corresponding domain in EGFR. Both ERBB2 and EGFR are membrane-associated tyrosine kinases and contain three functional domains: the extracellular ligand binding domain (aa 1-632), a lipophilic transmembrane segment (aa 633-654), and a cytoplasmic domain that exhibits tyrosine kinase activity (aa 655-1234) [2, 3], ERBB2 is frequently unregulated in human cancers such as breast cancer , ovarian cancer , and so on. High expression level of ERBB2 has been significantly correlated with increased tumor invasion, metastasis, resistance to chemotherapy, and poor prognosis of patients . However, a lack of reliable and accurate methods to assess the relationship between EGFR and ERBB2 gene status and protein expression in gastric cancer has limited correlative assessments with clinical parameters, including survival and sensitivity to targeted agents. Therefore, in the present study, we utilized fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess amplification of the ERBB2 and EGFR genes in gastric cancer patient samples. We combined this data with results from histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses to determine the relationship between ERBB2 and EGFR expression status and clinicopathological variables in gastric cancer.
Materials and methods
Patients and tumor samples
A total of 69 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at the Liberation Army No. 150 Central Hospital between July, 2008 and March, 2010 were included in this study. Tumor subtypes included 16 papillary adenocarcinomas, 14 tubular gland cancers, 15 mucinous adenocarcinomas, 13 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, and 11 signet ring cell carcinomas. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 59.2 years (range, 31-76 years). Tumor specimens were collected after obtaining informed consent from the patients in accordance with institutional guidelines. The samples were fixed in 10% neutral formalin in preparation for further studies.
ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification were analyzed by FISH using the Vysis Path Vysion ERBB2/DNA probe kit and the LSI EGFR SpectrumOrange/CEP 7 SpectrumGreen probe, respectively, according to manufacturer's instructions (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL, USA). Briefly, samples fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin were cut into 4 μm sections and incubated overnight at 56 °C. Slides were dewaxed in xylene and dehydrated in 100% alcohol for 5 min, followed by air drying. The slides were then incubated in proteinase K solution (0.2 mg/mL in 2 × SSC) at 37 °C for 15 min, washed with 2 × SSC (pH 7.0), and sequentially dehydrated in 70%, 85%, and 100% ethanol. After the application of 10 μl of probe to the target area of the slide, a coverslip was placed over the sample and sealed. Following denaturation at 73 °C for 5 min, the slides were allowed to hybridize overnight at 37 °C in a humidified chamber. After hybridization, the slides were washed in 0.4 × SSC containing 0.3% Nonidet P40 at 65 °C for 2 min and rinsed twice in 2 × SSC containing 0.1% Nonidet P40 for 2 min. The slides were then immersed in 70% ethanol for 3 min and dried at room temperature. After the slides were counterstained with 4', 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI), they were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany).
ERBB2 levels were reported as ERBB2 gene: CEP 17 ratios in order to normalize values to the total number of chromosomes within each cell. Amplification was defined as an ERBB2 gene/CEP 17 ratios greater than or equal to 2.0 . EGFR gene amplification was defined based on the criteria suggested by M Varella-Garcia, et al . Several FISH patterns were identified for EGFR: (1)EGFR FISH-positive: (a) at least 15 copies of the EGFR signals in ≥ 10% of tumour cells (b) Specimens that have ≥ 40% of cells displaying ≥ 4 copies of the EGFR signal.(c) EGFR/CEP7 ratio ~ 1, but the presence of gene cluster (≥ 4 spots) in ≥ 10% of tumour cells;(d) EGFR/CEP7 ratio ≥ 2 and the presence of gene cluster (≥ 4 spots) in ≥ 10% of tumour cells;(2) EGFR FISH-negative: Specimens that do not display gene amplification according to the criteria defined above and with <40% of cells displaying ≥ 4 copies of the EGFR signal.
ERBB2 and EGFR protein expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using the HercepTest™ and EGFR pharmDx™ kits, respectively, according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Two pathologists independently scored slides as 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+ according to the guidelines provided by DAKO. As defined in the manufacturer's instructions, scores of 0 or 1+ were considered negative, a score of 2+ was weakly positive, and a score of 3+ was strongly positive.
The SPSS 13.0 statistical package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. A χ2 test was used for comparisons with ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
ERBB2 gene amplification and protein expression
Comparison of ERBB2 gene amplification and protein expression in 69 cases of gastric cancer
Total positive cases
EGFR gene amplification and protein expression
Comparison of EGFR gene amplification and protein expression in 69 cases of gastric cancer
Total positive cases
Relationship between ERBB2 and EGFR gene abnormalities in gastric cancer
ERBB2 copy number alterations and gene amplification occurred in a total of 52.2% (36/69) of patient samples. EGFR copy number alterations and gene amplification occurred in a total of 57.9% (40/69) of patient samples. Both ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification were 3 cases (4.3%), but abnormalities in both ERBB2 and EGFR gene copy number were present 36.2% of samples, indicating that abnormalities in the two genes may be correlated.
Correlation between ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification and clinicopatholigical parameters in gastric cancer
Association of ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification with clinicopathological parameters in 69 cases of gastric cancer
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
Signet ring cell carcinoma
Gastric cancer staging
Lymph node metastasis
EGFR belongs to a family of four related receptors that includes the EGFR (HER1), ERBB2, HER3, and HER4 receptors . The EGFR gene is located in the short arm of human chromosome 7 and produces a glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 170 kDa with high affinity for the EGF ligand . EGFR mediates multiple signal transduction pathways and, thereby, connects extracellular signaling to intracellular changes in gene expression that modulate cellular growth and differentiation. Currently, EGFR and ERBB2 are the best characterized of the HER family receptors. However, little is known regarding the expression and function of these receptors in gastric cancer.
In recent years, interest has grown in understanding the relationship between the biological characteristics of gastric cancer and the association of these characteristics with the clinical outcomes of the disease. Current studies have focused on understanding the molecular basis of gastric cancer in order to help achieve accurate diagnoses and to better choose effective treatment options. With the advent of novel targeted therapeutics, these molecular characteristics may be important for obtaining more effective therapeutic outcomes. Presently, much of the available knowledge regarding EGFR and ERBB2 expression as well as their biological function in gastric cancer has come from countries other than China. Research techniques for characterization of EGFR and ERBB2 expression have included immunohistochemistry (IHC), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), and FISH. Using kits approved by the United States Federal Drug Administration for IHC (HercepTest™ and EGFR pharmDx™) and FISH (Path Vysion™), we have analyzed EGFR and ERBB2 protein expression and gene status in Chinese gastric cancer patients in order to provide more accurate reference data for future studies in the Chinese population.
EGFR and ERBB2 expression in gastric cancer has been reported in many past studies. IHC was first used in 1986 to detect ERBB2 expression in gastric cancer , which was followed by a large number of similar reports. Reported rates of ERBB2 gene expression in gastric cancer range were from 9% to 38%. Moreover, the correlation between EGFR/ERBB 2 expression in gastric cancer and prognosis remains controversial. In the present study, the ERBB2 protein was expressed in 42.0% (29/69) of gastric tumors, and ERBB2 gene amplification occurred in 20.3% (14/69) of tumors. Of 41 patients with lymph node metastases, ERBB2 gene amplification was present in 24.4% (10/41) of the cases. The EGFR protein was expressed in 52.2% (36/69) of gastric tumors, and EGFR gene amplification occurred in 29.0% (20/69) of tumors. Of patients with lymph node metastases, EGFR gene amplification was present in 34.1% (14/41) of the cases. These results suggest that ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification are positively associated with ERBB2 and EGFR protein expression. Furthermore, a higher frequency of ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification is present in gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastases. EGFR and ERBB2 expression in gastric epithelial cells are indicators of malignancy and may prove useful as markers for poor prognosis in gastric cancer.
At present, pathological examination is primary method used to assess the ERBB2 and EGFR status of tumor cells. In particular, IHC and FISH are commonly used in clinical settings. IHC is currently the most widely-used method, and kits are commercially-available for semi-quantitative detection of both ERBB2 and EGFR. Importantly, the higher levels of ERBB2 expression are associated with improved benefit of ERBB2-targeted anticancer drugs . Application of IHC to evaluate the expression of ERBB2 in tumor cells has limitations, as the determination of staining is partially subjective, as opposed to strictly quantitative. In contrast, results from the FISH are substantially less subjective than IHC, while maintaining sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, the quantitative nature of FISH results can effectively reduce operator interference and inter-laboratory variations . In the present study, FISH revealed that ERBB2 gene amplification was present in 4 of 4 cases with an IHC score of 3+, in 7 of 9 cases with an IHC score of 2+, and in only 3 of 16 cases with an IHC score of 1+. These results indicated that a statistically significant difference in ERBB2 gene amplification was present between the high (2+ and 3+) and low (1+) IHC score groups (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed with respect to EGFR gene amplification. EGFR gene amplification was observed in 5 of 5 samples with an IHC score of 3+, in 10 of 11 samples with a score of 2+, and in 5 of 20 samples with a score of 1+, which represented a significant difference between the high (2+ and 3+) and low (1+) scores (P < 0.05). Based on these results, the FISH assay could prove to be truly valuable for determination of ERBB2 and EGFR expression in clinical practice.
In recent years, new developments in cancer biology have led to the emergence of novel molecular-targeted therapeutics. These targeted drugs selectively act on cancer cells at the molecular, biochemical, and genetic levels, specifically targeting abnormal cells, with minimal effects on the function of normal cells. For example, EGFR inhibitors have been used to block EGFR activity and, thereby, increase the radiosensitivity of tumor cells . This phenomenon can lead to improvement of the efficacy of radiotherapy, likely because inhibition of EGFR signaling in tumor cells decreases cell proliferation, accelerates apoptosis, interferes with the cell cycle, and extends the time required for DNA repair after radiation . In the present study, FISH analysis revealed that EGFR gene amplification was present in 24.6% of the cases analyzed, and IHC showed that the EGFR protein was expressed in 52.2% of the cases. These results suggest that in some radiation-resistant gastric cancer cases, targeting of EGFR for radiation sensitization therapy may have important clinical value.
Co-expression of ERBB2 and EGFR may have synergistic effects on the progression of gastric cancer . ERBB2 gene amplification was observed in20.3% (14/69) of gastric cancer patients, including 24.4% (10/41) of the 41 patients with lymph node metastases and only 7.1% (2/28) of patients without lymph node metastases, representing a significant difference (P < 0.05). EGFR gene amplification was present in 29.0% (20/69) of gastric cancers, including 34.1% (14/41) of patients with lymph node metastases and 10.7% (3/28) of patients without lymph node metastases, again representing a significant difference (P < 0.05). ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification were also significantly related. Increased ERBB2 copy number and gene amplification were present in a total of 57.9% (40/69) of samples. However, Both ERBB2 and EGFR gene amplification of gastric tumors were 3 cases (4.3%), but abnormalities both ERBB2 and EGFR gene copy number were present in 36.2% of samples. These results suggest that alterations in ERBB2 or EGFR gene status in gastric cancer are common events that frequently occur within the same tumor.
In summary, ERBB2 and EGFR are transmembrane tyrosine kinases that can promote tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Expression of ERBB2 and EGFR appear to be closely related, and one or both proteins are frequently overexpressed in gastric epithelial cancer cells. Furthermore, the degree of expression is correlated with tumor invasion, progression, and patient survival, suggesting that these genes may represent important indicators of poor prognosis. EGFR overexpression in gastric cancer commonly leads to radiation resistance. Therefore, EGFR-targeted radiosensitization treatments may have important clinical value for treatment of gastric cancer.
We would like to thank Professor Yan-qing Ding (Southern Medical University) faithfully about his support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Sebastian S, Settleman J, Reshkin SJ, Azzariti A, Bellizzi A, Paradiso A: The complexity of targeting EGFR signaling in cancer: from expression to turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1766: 120–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen QQ, Chen XY, Jiang YY, Liu J: Identification of novel nuclear localization signal within the ErbB-2 protein. Cell Res 2005, 15: 504–10. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290320PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nyati MK, Morgan MA, Feng FY, Lawrence TS: Integration of EGFR inhibitors with radiochemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2006, 6: 876–85. 10.1038/nrc1953PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duffy MJ: Predictive markers in breast and other cancers: a review. Clin Chem 2005, 51: 494–503. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.046227PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takai N, Jain A, Kawamata N, Popoviciu LM, Said JW, Whittaker S, Miyakawa I, Agus DB, Koeffler HP: 2C4, a monoclonal antibody against HER2, disrupts the HER kinase signaling pathway and inhibits ovarian carcinoma cell growth. Cancer 2005, 104: 2701–8. 10.1002/cncr.21533PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Nayod SA: Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13: 4429–34. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang YK: Fluorescence in situ hybridization: Gao CF. In New technology and clinical laboratory diagnosis. 1st edition. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2010:85–112.Google Scholar
- Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Rüschoff J, Kang YK: ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 376: 687–97. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varella-Garcia M, Diebold J, Eberhard DA, Geenen K, Hirschmann A, Kockx M, Nagelmeier I, Rüschoff J, Schmitt M, Arbogast S, Cappuzzo F: EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay: guidelines for application to non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Pathol 2009, 62: 970–7. 10.1136/jcp.2009.066548PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lenferink AE, Pinkas-Kramarski R, van de Poll ML, van Vugt MJ, Klapper LN, Tzahar E, Waterman H, Sela M, van Zoelen EJ, Yarden Y: Differential endocytic routing of homo and hetero-dimeric ErbB tyrosine kinases confers signalig superiority to receptor heterodimers. EMBO J 1998, 17: 3385–3397. 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3385PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-Soler R: HER1/EGFR targeting: refining the strategy. Oncologist 2004, 9: 58–67. 10.1634/theoncologist.9-1-58PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakai K, Mori S, Kawamoto T, Taniguchi S, Kobori O, Morioka Y, Kuroki T, Kano K: Expression of epidermal growth factor receptors on normal human gastric epithelia and gastric carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986, 77: 1047–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brabender J, Danenberg KD, Metzger R, Schneider PM, Park J, Salonga S, Hölscher AH, Danenberg PV: Epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with survival. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7: 1850–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penault-Llorea F, Cayre A: Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer. Bull Cancer 2004, 91: S211–15.Google Scholar
- Cao WG, Ma T, Li JF, Li H, Ji YB, Chen XH, Liu BY, Jin YN: Effect of gefitinib on radiosensitivity of gastric cancer cell lines. Ai Zheng 2007, 26: 1330–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reuter CW, Morgan MA, Eckardt A: Targeting EGF-receptor-signaling in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 2007, 96: 408–16. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603566PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Onn A, Correa AM, Gilcrease M, Isobe T, Massarelli E, Bucana CD, O'Reilly MS, Hong WK, Fidler IJ, Putnam JB, Herbst RS: Synchronous overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu protein is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10: 136–43. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0373-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.